Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
DrammBA
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
DrammBA
5mo ago
I have a feeling the real reason is them trying to avoid someone using AI to copyright-wash their product, they're just using security as the excuse.
32.
▲
by
DrammBA
5mo ago
> Isn't this a SaaS-pocaplyse testament? What's stopping anyone from doing the same to BrightBean? It being open source doesn't help it either, so easy to malus/chardet it.
33.
▲
by
DrammBA
5mo ago
Given how many developers here use LLMs daily, how do you think about defensibility? Tools like this seem relatively easy to reverse-engineer and replicate with enough time and LLM assistance. Did that influence your decision to charge a su
34.
▲
by
DrammBA
5mo ago
the notation is just an array of move tuples, each tuple contains 1 move for white and 1 move for black, where each move is written as <1st letter of piece name><destination square>
35.
▲
by
DrammBA
5mo ago
TFA intro (emphasis mine): > In this Friday’s magic demonstration, I’m going to show how what you see in Privacy & Security settings can be misleading, when it tells you that an app doesn’t have access to a protected folder, but it
36.
▲
by
DrammBA
6mo ago
What do stars mean in the context of random github accounts mirroring leaked source code?
37.
▲
by
DrammBA
6mo ago
I wouldn't expect it from any goverment either, but I would expect it from someone who allegedly read the story and is trying to share relevant information.
38.
▲
by
DrammBA
6mo ago
I could swear immich already has at least sharing and search.
39.
▲
by
DrammBA
6mo ago
> Relevant to this story Is it? The Author mentions he has degenerated optical nerves from birth, I don't think laser fixes that.
40.
▲
by
DrammBA
6mo ago
What are you adding on top of immich?
41.
▲
by
DrammBA
6mo ago
It feels so disrespectful sometimes too, having to read a long paragraph that conveys so little meaning knowing full well the original prompt was probably very short and I'm now wasting extra time parsing the hollow LLM text expansion.
42.
▲
by
DrammBA
6mo ago
> I view this as an unmitigated good. Open source every damn thing. Agree, I said this in another comment, AI-generated anything should be public domain. Public data in, public domain out. This train wreck in slow motion of AI slowly ero
43.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
> Lawyer here. Its not. This article is highly confused. Did you reply to the wrong comment? I was just saying I like the idea of AI-generated anything being public domain, not that it currently is/isn't.
44.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
Also the maintainer's ground-up rewrite argument is very flimsy when they used chardet's test-data and freely admit to: > I've been the primary maintainer and contributor to this project for >12 years > I have had ex
45.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
Sometimes I wish they just posted the prompt, not everything has to go through an LLM blender before posting.
46.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
Yes, anything AI-generated should be public domain including the AI-generated picture that used your photo as input.
47.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
> Were comments excluded from that analysis? According to the analysis that you referenced: > JPlag parses Python source into syntactic tokens (function definitions, assignments, control flow, etc.), discarding all variable names, com
48.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
I like the idea of AI-generated ~code~ anything being public domain. Public data in, public domain out.
49.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
> Also exhibits the curious quality of being faster than over a decade of engineering at Facebook in some cases Vertex is faster in 2 tests (12% and 32%), and slower in 2 other tests (149% and 200%). Very curious wording on the OP when r
50.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
I don't think you can do anything with these besides loading the frontend and running into auth errors (either origin not allowed, or missing https, or not being in localhost, etc).
51.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
I've seen multiple comments saying that openclaw stars itself during onboarding or that it asks its user to star, but noone has posted any proof, is there any concrete evidence for those claims?
52.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
> I could just as well use a saved prompt in Claude On that note, do you mind sharing the prompt? I want to see how good something like GLM or Kimi does just by pure prompting on OpenCode.
53.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
Please note that Motion Canvas is also abandoned, the main site is down, and the last commit was Dec 2024.
54.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
It's incredible that google translate had this moat for a decade (maybe more) including live translation but people prefer to use chatgpt now
55.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
Again, subscription gives you a fixed allotment of tokens, doesn't matter if you consume them with claude code or with a 3rd-party tool, both get the same amount of tokens and thus cost Anthropic the same. In fact it might even be bett
56.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
The reddit link mentions that they only reported what is now issue #9 and bitwarden has said it's working as intended, so that's why they were "ignored" 4 years ago.
57.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
You forgot: > A personal list for uBlock Origin
58.
▲
Anthropic legal request: OpenCode removes Claude subscription support
(github.com)
6 points
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
|
1 comments
59.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
opencode-anthropic-auth archived: https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode-anthropic-auth anthropic legal demanded this pull request be closed: https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode-anthropic-auth
60.
▲
by
DrammBA
7mo ago
> are you likely to place the blame on OpenCode? am I ? Probably, but I get your point that your average user would blame Anthropic instead. > even if total token limits are the same, less caching means higher costs Not really, flat-
More ›