CLPadvocate

6 ms·

1.
by CLPadvocate 6mo ago
crossed swastika would still be considered distribution of Nazi symbols. there was already a criminal case many years ago where (if I'm remembering it correctly) a student putting "no nazis"-stickers with a crossed swastika h
2.
by CLPadvocate 6mo ago
there is an old story that exists in numerous variants and goes roughly like this: A town’s electricity generator failed and various engineers were unable to fix it, so an elderly electrician was summoned. He examined the generator carefull
3.
by CLPadvocate 6mo ago
This is basically bullshit. First of all - most people also in the US obviously don't know that there are exceptions from the First Amendment, excluding certain categories of speech from protection. Second, the First Amendment at the t
4.
by CLPadvocate 7mo ago
where did you get this bullshit from? by every definition of democracy, Iran is very close to the worst end of the scale - just as an example https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/democracy...
5.
by CLPadvocate 7mo ago
> Yet many people persist in calling aluminum foil "tinfoil." > We chemists get annoyed at things like that. > Now, about aluminum foil. Actually, most chemists are profoundly annoyed at the Americans' inability to s
6.
by CLPadvocate 8mo ago
from Indoeuropean "gwen" over scandinavian "kvinna" = Woman
7.
by CLPadvocate 8mo ago
and this is called systematic discrimination against Israel. maybe someone should teach the UN high commissioner basics of law.
8.
by CLPadvocate 10mo ago
sure - GBU-57 are roughly half a million per piece, with express home delivery.
9.
by CLPadvocate 10mo ago
it would be scary, if Apollo wouldn't be a famous right-wing "alternative news" outlet known for absolutely fabricated stories and campaigns.
10.
by CLPadvocate 10mo ago
i really don't know how comments like this one can be tolerated here. it's not about flagging or banning - it's really should be about legal actions.
11.
by CLPadvocate 10mo ago
this is exactly what other countries do since ages - US, UK, France - just to name a few - they all have territories under their control, but not integrated into the state itself, with population having different, but usually lesser rights
12.
by CLPadvocate 10mo ago
they don't even want it - because otherwise you can't play the victim card and blame jews for everything. their entire "economy" is based on that.
13.
by CLPadvocate 10mo ago
jews are the indigenous population. at least from all existing people, jews have the oldest and most substantial historical rights to the modern-day Israel.
14.
by CLPadvocate 10mo ago
here is the entire story: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/04/bbc-arabic-bias-...
15.
by CLPadvocate 11mo ago
Didn't you forget to mention the genocide of the so-called "palestinians" on jews, lasting for nearly 80 years? Or would you rather prefer to discuss it in the context of 1300-year-long Arab occupation of the lands they absol
16.
by CLPadvocate 11mo ago
It's not a legal site according to German law (crucial parts are missing). And its terms of use are insane. And the creator needs a German language course - there are many mistakes on the site.
17.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
some time ago, IBM was not only AN AI company, it was THE AI company of their time (with Deep Blue, then with Watson).
18.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
> Regardless of intention, it is a test where intelligence helps you perform. PISA is just testing if you learned some set of information at specific point in time. It has basically nothing to do with intelligence - it's a test of s
19.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
Just FYI: PISA was never meant to test intelligence. And IQ in general is unscientific bullshit.
20.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
it's not France - it's a poor little man, who has basically no support in his own country, and who pathetically tries to appear important to the world.
21.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
It's actually pretty consistent - they knew back then that the entire Red Scare was a complete bullshit, used only for oppression of dissidents - and now they are just using new methods for the same goal.
22.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
You wish. Basically 90% of German nazis stayed in Germany and were completely unharmed by any form of persecution. Most of them had even kept everything they stole from all the murdered people, including companies, homes, and items of value
23.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
most obvious things are often enough the mostly wrong ones - this is why everyone was sure for centuries that the Earth is flat or that the Sun and stars are orbiting the Earth. and this is why people invented specific protocols to ensure (
24.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
there are a couple of problems with these "international organisations": first and foremost - they are created by the few former colonial powers who were never hold accountable for their own war crimes - but instead gave them the
25.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
Are you kidding me - of course it's not a proof. It's already in the description - they are not claiming that they have proven something - they just say it looks like something. It's not even an opinion.
26.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
Not a single one of these is even close to be a proof. All of them are just opinions of specific groups of people - most of them have their own agenda, so they can't even be considered to be unbiased opinions. If we're talking abo
27.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
Not really - it may be sufficient for you to develop an opinion, but it definitely not a legal proof.
28.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
It's actually the case since decades. All the Palestinian organisations, Huthis, Hezbollah, and Iran OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCED genocide on Israel as their main reason d'etre and did their best to accomplish it - and UN didn't care
29.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
> The UK has people in prison for tweets and saying mean words. We do not have that; the first amendment is not a myth. US seems not to understand yet, how fast words become deeds. Every oppression starts with words. > You called me a
30.
by CLPadvocate 1y ago
Robert Habeck would not get in trouble, because it's extremely improbable that he would ever use inappropriate language. But in general, every politician insulting any other person could face legal action. It happened before and it wou

More ›