CBLT

7 ms·

1.
by CBLT 6d ago
Can you recommend any model that doesn't do this?
2.
by CBLT 11d ago
I also read that comment as an adversarial situation at work. It used to be that when someone else at your company was asking for something that wasn't a priority, you would erect bureaucratic roadblocks to protect your time. Now, the
3.
by CBLT 13d ago
I was bothered by the writing and fought through it, and carefully went through everything in the article... and you didn't miss anything. It's a tweet expanded to article length.
4.
by CBLT 20d ago
If you can actually time the market, sure. I cannot, so I don't pull money out of my stock indexes; I just send a larger fraction of my new investments into bonds.
5.
by CBLT 22d ago
I've been telling people the same thing. The tech industry has been cargo-culting "scaling the organization" where people are rewarded for org size. That zeitgeist has ended, and we've not even overcorrected much the o
6.
by CBLT 26d ago
> the CPUID example in the article [...] forgot to bind ECX as an input. I'm not really familiar with this stuff, but the example uses what it calls a "pin" (which in their docs is a type of "binding") on ECX bef
7.
by CBLT 27d ago
The Google Drive link is to a simple tarball, not a git artifact.
8.
by CBLT 28d ago
Non-sequitor? They're not providing a (sha-1) hash, they're providing source code to integration partners using their business channels, not public git providers. Those business channels include contracts etc to "secure the
9.
by CBLT 28d ago
It doesn't break supply chain security for anybody with power to change the situation.
10.
by CBLT 1mo ago
Interestingly, this was tackled in this blog post[0] a month ago. They claim that plan files aren't token-efficient, because after reading the plan the workhorse model then reads all the relevant files anyways. [0] https://
11.
by CBLT 1mo ago
That's a measure of the costs GitHub incurs to operate, not of its value as a platform.
12.
by CBLT 1mo ago
I heat it bare, then seconds before I put the steak in I pour some peanut oil, which immediately begins smoking.
13.
by CBLT 1mo ago
I've tried a blowtorch and a barbecue, but they're not as good as cast iron. Best results from just spending $15 on a second cast iron.
14.
by CBLT 1mo ago
Article aside, I generally always use the "we" pronoun at work when writing prose. Saying "I" feels too adversarial when talking about negative effects, or too self-aggrandizing when talking about positive effects. For
15.
by CBLT 1mo ago
Generating new conjectures is easy. It's generating novel conjectures that's hard.
16.
by CBLT 1mo ago
I said "never called them on their plausible deniability" to mean I never pulled off the veil of the conversation, so there's nothing to talk about in front of a judge. FWIW both the company I was leaving and the company I wa
17.
by CBLT 1mo ago
The only time I did that, the company I was leaving begged me to take one of their corp laptops with me so I could offer "consulting" to them on the side. I never called them on their plausible deniability, I just said I felt tha
18.
by CBLT 2mo ago
I'm trying to understand what you mean, because it's not obvious to me at all. If you read LKML you'll see stacked PRs has been the norm for years. I'm assuming you want the `gh stack` porcelain into the git cli? We&#
19.
by CBLT 2mo ago
The interim policy you're proposing seems to have far different priors. The clearest indication of their stance is that they don't even want bug reports that have AI generate part of the text. You don't take a stand like th
20.
by CBLT 2mo ago
SQL/PGQ (Property Graph Queries) is part of the SQL standard as of 2023. I found this project months ago _because_ they included PGQ in their name, I was searching for PGQ implementations.
21.
by CBLT 2mo ago
Not by name, sure, but it does mention that you're going to be reading the same context into the second model. It specifically refutes your point that you're only reading the smaller plan: > Opus reads base.py, signing.py, the
22.
by CBLT 2mo ago
Memory is a harness feature, not a model feature. The author is probably only evaluating their own harness with different models, so Claude-Code-specifics like memory aren't part of their evaluation.
24.
by CBLT 3mo ago
I'm not really sure memcached optimizes for operational simplicity. The only time I've run it at scale, it would have low cpu utilization then unexpectedly hit lock contention and fall over without warning.
25.
by CBLT 3mo ago
I also like having long, pointed conversations with LLMs as I review code. Then when I'm done, it's different code, and it has all of my blind spots and knowledge gaps, so I cannot effectively review it anymore. It's like tu
26.
by CBLT 4mo ago
> Imagine a big codebase with this somewhere in it: fn processThing(thing: Thing) void { // this function must always be invoked on // a thing that has already been started assert(thing.is_s
27.
by CBLT 4mo ago
Eh, it's worse than that. The GP comment is repeating a joke derived from an Onion headline about gun control. Where the very poignant message is about political will to make change. However, the npm ecosystem is very much willing a
28.
by CBLT 4mo ago
I've been oncall for a different G service that nearly paged on every error. It used the standard error budget tooling, but on hundreds of user buckets because the engineering around locality-specific configuration was... suspect. Ma
29.
by CBLT 6mo ago
People are quick to point out that induced demand exists - especially people that aren't fond of change. Very broadly speaking, people mis-estimate effect sizes in economics by orders of magnitude. Induced demand is just their foothol
30.
by CBLT 6mo ago
I use a PR notifier chrome extension, so I have a badge on the toolbar whenever a PR is waiting on me. I get to them in typically <2 minutes during work hours because I tab over to chrome whenever AI is thinking. Sometimes I even get t

More ›