7 ms·

It doesn't break supply chain security for anybody with power to change the situation.

• asdfsa32 28d ago
  It is an easy to overlook this, but even for someone in position of power to change, creating different code with the same hash is borderline impossible.
  • CBLT 28d ago
    Non-sequitor? They're not providing a (sha-1) hash, they're providing source code to integration partners using their business channels, not public git providers. Those business channels include contracts etc to "secure their supply chain". You and I aren't in those business channels, and we're not being given anything with a hash. There's simply no hash to collide with?
    • asdfsa32 28d ago
      A git hash is cryptographically secure. It doesn't matter how you distribute it. That is the entire point you're missing.
      • CBLT 28d ago
        The Google Drive link is to a simple tarball, not a git artifact.
        • asdfsa32 27d ago
          Yes, that is the problem, as the titles says "Google has stopped pushing Git tags". No git tags, no cryptographic content hash.