AngaraliTurk

5 ms·

1.
by AngaraliTurk 2y ago
It was a reply to your comment: > However, Turkey to the north is really not keen on the Kurds having any territory, so they'll do whatever they can to frustrate this. It's not true that Turkey is not keen on the Kurds having a
2.
by AngaraliTurk 2y ago
The Iraqi Kurdistan (KRG) you mention has friendly relations with Turkey.
3.
by AngaraliTurk 2y ago
I was giving you the benefit of doubt all this time, but your comments about my country confirms to me that you're misinformed. For all I hate Erdoğan and his attempts to undermine democracy, and I want to see him gone sooner or later,
4.
by AngaraliTurk 2y ago
I've heard and read Greece being compared to the Middle East as well, more than one time.
5.
by AngaraliTurk 2y ago
You might be an exception, an outlier, like many on HN, in regards to this effect. What applies to most people is more probable not to apply to me or you because we're self selected here, a bubble. This is given you're not either
6.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
It could be a recursive simulator.
7.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
It would be nice if you could report this on Github. You can do it here: https://github.com/open-spaced-repetition/fsrs4anki/issues/n...
8.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
The point is that you're looking for something that accounts for your memory patterns while reviewing things haphazardly, which goes against the former. It doesn't exist. I wonder why you just don't use traditional study meth
9.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
I haven't made any assumptions about your goals. I simply reminded you that memories kind of have "expiry dates", so that review dates are necessary. The backlog you mentioned is the memories you're about to forget if no
10.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
But that's not how memory works...you can't put your memory on hold like you're suggesting. There's a reason FSRS follows a personalized memory curve.
11.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
Try to spend more time imagining and entertaining that thought. They both have the same function but execute it differently.
12.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
In all honesty, I believe the reverse is true. Our technology seems modeled after humans and the environment we inhabit. Airplanes being glorified birds, wheels being glorified feet, computers being glorified brains or neural networks...wel
13.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
I am Muslim and the universe is what I identify God with. It seems "natural" to me and what I feel is actually being conveyed. Now I wonder how other adherents of world religions actually see God.
14.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
You and me think we are but we can't be sure, and many before us have raised a doubt. As for the prompt(s), to use such a limiting term, they could as well come from a self-reinforcing loop that starts when we're born and is influ
15.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
I don't define X because it's highly variable. It seems to me that on one extreme there are people easily anthropomorphising advanced computing and on the other extreme there are people trivializing it with sentences like "gl
16.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
I wanted to put the focus on the overused "glorified x thing" sentence, which to me seems to be applicable to just about anything. I didn't want to liken/compare AI to biological systems per se.
17.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
> And while LLMs are certainly an exciting new technology, it's not at all clear that they're really more than a glorified autocorrect. Are we sure things like biology, or heck, even the universe as a whole and its parts, aren&
18.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
Same.
19.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
Spaced repetition software system? That's not the usual meaning of SRS, but good to know some people use it like that.
20.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
Just a very small nitpick, but "system" is redundant when you say SRS, as it would be like saying Spaced Repetition System system.
21.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
Yes, it's implied.
22.
by AngaraliTurk 3y ago
Interesting model! Just a few mistakes like "medecine" and "[...] a big canon?" that I guess were influenced by you speaking French, but nothing serious to detract from your creation.