6 ms·
It's probably a good model for folks doing basic software stuff, or humanities related tasks, but I work in cybersecurity on the defense/detections side and I h
by prettyblocks 16d ago
It's probably a good model for folks doing basic software stuff, or humanities related tasks, but I work in cybersecurity on the defense/detections side and I haven't been able to use it for anything even with being in the CVP. It downgrades to Opus every time.
- ronsor 16d agoFable is way too expensive for basic software stuff. Other models are more than good enough for that. In general, if Fable isn't blocking you, there's a high chance a lower tier model would work fine.
- elevation 16d agoThe only problems Opus struggles with, Fable won't take on. I was porting some software from Win32 to linux. Opus was running in circles. Fable was going great until it saw some authentication code and bailed.
- vablings 16d agoI have been running Fable with Binary Ninja MCP. It will reverse engineer a binary in a lot of detail if you give it mild direction and I haven't had it flag. I think it assumes since I have a valid binja license I must be responsible lol. I do think probably ralph looping a binary locally first is going to be best to get 100% recovery of types and function behaviors then letting a smarter model churn the final steps.