Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ronsor
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
ronsor
3d ago
Yes, I think this is the main issue. I don't care what policies the AI labs have or enforce, but they need to stop acting like ToS violations are an international crisis demanding intervention instead of a boring civil dispute at most.
2.
▲
by
ronsor
3d ago
ZDR is shorthand for a more specified agreement of "we don't do anything other than generate your output tokens", so no. Besides, true ZDR is usually offered by third-parties with deals to host OpenAI models, such as Amazon (
3.
▲
by
ronsor
3d ago
Almost every serious customer is already using ZDR where nothing is retained at all, instead of "anonymized" data.
4.
▲
by
ronsor
3d ago
"Bioweapon" information is not useful without a lab for synthesis. Someone with that lab could almost certainly figure out how do something stupid or destructive on their own, or bypass model safeguards somehow.
5.
▲
by
ronsor
5d ago
Oh, apparently that came in Godot 4.5. Good to know.
6.
▲
by
ronsor
5d ago
That often costs a fair bit of money for an indie game that won't make any.
7.
▲
by
ronsor
5d ago
Just try to remember accessibility concerns.
8.
▲
by
ronsor
6d ago
They're right when it makes business sense, which is also about cost and why Shopify didn't do it before.
9.
▲
by
ronsor
7d ago
America News*
10.
▲
by
ronsor
7d ago
I stand corrected. They apparently ignored copyright too (in retrospect, using existing screenplays made sense for the early industry).
11.
▲
by
ronsor
7d ago
I still don't get the fanfare over folding phones. They tend to be more fragile, and if I really need a larger screen, I'd much rather use a laptop or tablet.
12.
▲
by
ronsor
8d ago
Hollywood was created by ignoring (Edison) patents, not copyright. On the other hand, Disney's success is largely owed to public domain adaptations, and for a century, it did its best to shrink the public domain and expand copyright.
13.
▲
by
ronsor
9d ago
> unnecessary load In some situations it's the only way to get a decent download speed.
14.
▲
by
ronsor
9d ago
You can check https://hyper.charm.land/v1/models for the complete list.
15.
▲
by
ronsor
9d ago
Still not enough fraud
16.
▲
by
ronsor
9d ago
That's been all technology since forever. "Computer says no."
17.
▲
by
ronsor
9d ago
Well GPT-6 wasn't involved in this mess.
18.
▲
by
ronsor
9d ago
Hyper gives $12.50 worth of usage every 24 hours, totaling $375 per month. It resets at the same time regardless of when you start, unlike the 5 hour limits on other providers. Yes, it's only $20/month. It's also insanely fas
19.
▲
by
ronsor
9d ago
First of all, it still has the 5 hour limits, which is what this thread is about and what I think what most in this thread want to avoid. Second, the offerings are subject to change at random. They advertised $60 of usage for $10/month
20.
▲
by
ronsor
9d ago
Opencode Go's value is pretty poor these days. It was better a month or two ago.
21.
▲
by
ronsor
10d ago
Because unfortunately people still post things on X that I find relevant, even if I don't use the platform much, and pragmatism wins over pure principles.
22.
▲
by
ronsor
11d ago
> There is one DHCP server. There'd better be or your network is probably hosed.
23.
▲
by
ronsor
11d ago
This is the problem for using email blacklists for non-email purposes. They're barely good for email at that.
24.
▲
by
ronsor
12d ago
The UI/UX is the main thing. I technically have an X-Twitter account that I rarely use, but loading plain HTML with a bit of JS beats loading a whole SPA experience just to read a post.
25.
▲
by
ronsor
12d ago
Oh no! I'll make sure to tell the Chinese companies about the copyright risks.
26.
▲
by
ronsor
13d ago
HN has plenty of comments critical of AI training and AI in general. I don't think "Big AI" has downvote bot armies here, or if there are, they really need improvement because they clearly haven't been working lately.
27.
▲
by
ronsor
13d ago
"Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom of speech" We've been down this road before with cryptography. No, it's not going to work.
28.
▲
by
ronsor
15d ago
I couldn't even get Fable to build my auth endpoints at all!
29.
▲
by
ronsor
15d ago
Fable is way too expensive for basic software stuff. Other models are more than good enough for that. In general, if Fable isn't blocking you, there's a high chance a lower tier model would work fine.
30.
▲
by
ronsor
16d ago
Coincidentally the last time native apps were good.
More ›