4 ms·
Copy-pasting my comment to the other poster making the same point: "Antifa" is not being presented as an ideology, it is being portrayed as a global terror cel
by compass_copium 21d ago
Copy-pasting my comment to the other poster making the same point:
"Antifa" is not being presented as an ideology, it is being portrayed as a global terror cell. The specific purpose for this is to be able criminalize leftist politics, since the state has many more tools to prevent association with foreign groups.
"Nazi" does not have a leader, but the Nazi party had a leader. Atomwaffen had a leader. Various III% groups have leaders. Strangely, these groups are not being linked to foreign right-wing groups in an attempt to make them illegal.
- Saline9515 21d ago[flagged]
- compass_copium 21d agoWith respect, this is false. JDL members were certainly charged with crimes. They were not charged with belongimg to the JDL, since that would be a first amendment violation. There are interesting reports on state.gov describing the difficulties the JDL caused with the Soviet Union, eg.: https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v13/d102 https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v13... Note that at no point do they discuss banning the JDL or charging members with belonging to the JDL.
- Saline9515 21d agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Defense_League https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Defense_League Ok maybe I'm wrong or there is some subtle legalese but the wikipedia page states that "it was described as a "right-wing terrorist group" by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 2001".
- compass_copium 21d agoBeing part of a domestic terrorist group is protected by the first amendment in the United States. Being part of a foreign terrorist group is not. You can pay dues to the KKK, you cannot donate to Hezbollah.