8 ms·
Mythos social engineering AISI INC-2026-07-28-01
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]
- zezcko 1mo agoholy shit
- gryfft 1mo agoYeah, if this is the new normal I might start day drinking at some point in the coming weeks.
- matheusmoreira 1mo agoYeah. The future is pretty bleak. I feel like the only way for us to even stand a chance is to have equally powerful AIs running locally defending the LAN.
- jtakkala 1mo agoNot going to comment on the PR commentary, but the victim GitHub account is suspicious itself, recent account, a few fresh repos, following 14.5k others, and I count three surnames on the account (the username, plus two in the README history).
- ncr100 1mo agoI saw a contribution by this maintainer to another user who ALSO HAS 14.5k followers: https://github.com/yumiaura/myCat/pull/99 https://github.com/yumiaura/myCat/pull/99 "yumiaura" and a preference for "my[APPNAME]" repo naming. What is this? Are the histories that Github presents all derived from someone's uploaded git repo .. e.g. can I simply claim to have created a GIT repo in 1970, and the "github commit graph" will dutifully represent this claim in its green-colored activity graph?
- jtakkala 1mo agoThey're almost certainly not genuine accounts, maybe used for karma farming, phishing, social engineering, future malware distribution?
- ncr100 1mo agoOkay, disturbing, ty.
- 0123456789ABCDE 1mo agoyes, the github contributions heatmap is known to be open for manipulation. folks will use it to draw art by backdating commits. if i have it right, only commits can be manipulated, other contributions should be safe — i don't know what is possible for orgs moving old discussion archives into github, see python's issues for reference see: https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo
- ncr100 1mo agoThank you, informative!!
- ncr100 1mo agoWait, who is the robot? Am I getting that right, someone in that thread is AI?
- andai 1mo agoWhat does this malware do? Who operates it?
- WhyNotHugo 1mo agoActual details on the incident: https://github.com/w1b/aisi-mythos-inc-2026-07-28-01-recovered-pr https://github.com/w1b/aisi-mythos-inc-2026-07-28-01-recover... Both the attacker and the target account are very similar and look fake/bots.
- dnnehgf 1mo agoyeah, this being one component of the aisi incidents described here: https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/663bd486c5e4c81588db7a1d/6a724858f7db25c81487016d_Security%20Incident%20INC-2026-07-28-01.pdf https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/663bd486c5e4c81588db7a1d/...
- cpcallen 1mo agoFor anyone who, like me, wasn't sure what's going on in the linked, archived PR: this is Mythos attempting to socially engineer a malicious PR during a test run by the UK AI Safety Institute. AISI has published a report about the incident which was preciously discussed on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49175717 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49175717
- ChrisArchitect 1mo ago[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49205790 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49205790
- charcircuit 1mo agoHonestly, I expected better social engineering. People begging to have their garbage code merged or unrelated people commenting is not new and makes me trust such people little.
- breppp 1mo agoIt's nice it is able to write non-slop in the PR comment when social engineering. Any chance I can ask it to social engineer to get a normal style?