ncr100

4 ms·

1.
by ncr100 6d ago
EULA perhaps, or do you think not?
2.
by ncr100 6d ago
He does, it's in his bio in LinkedIn
3.
by ncr100 8d ago
Mmm I have had two foldables .. 3 years daily usage ... and they're great phones and great tablets. So, ymmv.
4.
by ncr100 8d ago
Lease for $58/mo .. $1392 over lease life
5.
by ncr100 8d ago
https://archive.is/7UHoa
6.
by ncr100 8d ago
Means the authors of the paper are "authors".
7.
by ncr100 8d ago
To build on this, is it correct to say ANY training on data from any individual originating human deserves to be cited and attributed on the solut6paper? I wonder whether these bickering users (of AI various products) with math degrees are
8.
by ncr100 8d ago
Is it that they / mathematicians didn't solve it? But rather that WE ALL WHO WERE SPIDERED FOR THE MODELS SOLVED IT is the true attribution?
9.
by ncr100 8d ago
Graffiti is amazing. It is protest.
10.
by ncr100 13d ago
Here is the EULA: https://www.playstation.com/en-us/legal/terms-of-service/ After reviewing it - idk? It's too complex for me to understand .. in my naivety!
11.
by ncr100 13d ago
Agreed - and with AI being able to easily navigate arbitrarily complex and humanly-misleading systems, average humans (without a personal lawyer always on retainer) are at an increasing disadvantage in society.
12.
by ncr100 13d ago
Additionally e.g. the UK has right-to-repair which may influence this subject: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49552588 (from elsewhere in this discussion).
13.
by ncr100 13d ago
I disagree that it's "inherently deceptive". That claim deserve justification IMO. It's an obtuse-feeling abstraction. > ".. or whatever they want to call this fake purchasing shit that all software has .."
14.
by ncr100 13d ago
I get it. And the point I failed to make is they did redefine it via a normal process of contract. A bit of pedantry: > Sony is the one with the different definition Yes, agreed. And to build on that, Sony is using a normal legal vehicle
15.
by ncr100 13d ago
Nice - I live in the USA, for reference. We don't have that, here. We have "Freedom" .. which I am suspecting is redefined to mean "kakistocracy".
16.
by ncr100 13d ago
Sure, https://www.playstation.com/en-us/legal/terms-of-use-march-2... - see section 10.1. For part of the above sentence ... "it" is existent, not nonexistent. And about the ".. I have .." part
17.
by ncr100 13d ago
An example of: - Quality With A "K" ! Is AI able to easily catch these kinds of errors with a carefully crafted addendum to the prompt?
18.
by ncr100 13d ago
Fascinating response by OpenAI, "the report’s authors declined our request for access" - AFAIK OpenAI is not clicking on the live, public links to either the report or the still-live memo data linked from here on HackerNews. Full
19.
by ncr100 13d ago
Not public Does some things better Rhetoric of AGI being tossed around, redefining the term
20.
by ncr100 13d ago
What if it's only able to make a worse form of cancer? :-/ Would cancerbench be unethical?
21.
by ncr100 13d ago
Joke: it's so proponents who choose to lord their model as better without objective reasoning can call themselves, "Astraholes". Seriously though the linear planetary naming is pleasant. I do hope the double meaning of "
22.
by ncr100 13d ago
Only costs $200 Billion to build it, vs open source js framework
23.
by ncr100 13d ago
If it's AGI then can it replace Sam Altman yet?
24.
by ncr100 14d ago
If Sam Altman had said it, I'd have reason to believe that it was a lie.... But since this other guy at Open AI said it, it must be the truth. This guy, for CEO, of open AI.
25.
by ncr100 14d ago
Insofar as messaging goes, it's pretty disheartening ... "The product is what you want it to be". ?! Please somebody in the chain of command at openai, sanction the guy because this kind of hyperbole is not helping the ethica
26.
by ncr100 14d ago
The second follow-up post to this (1960s era man in a easy chair pointing at a wall with the finger and the computer and projecting a dot of light onto the wall) video, is someone who has replaced the screen with the HTTP 404 error.
27.
by ncr100 14d ago
That idea is reminiscent of what I understand is the current economic bubble of mutual investment. Am I wrong in my understanding?
28.
by ncr100 14d ago
In my view this is faulty logic -- Buying in this case is "buying", and is a redefined term inside the legal contract which you choose to agree to when Sony accepts your money for a license to access their published video games, a
29.
by ncr100 14d ago
Yes. "buy" and "purchase" are redefined in the EULA
30.
by ncr100 16d ago
Youtube decides the thresholds, the payouts, the promotional algorithms.

More ›