16 ms·
App Store Rejection of the Week: Dark Hours
- AlexandrB 1mo agoI look forward to this app now being approved because getting a viral post on reddit/HN/Twitter is what passes for customer service in 2026.
- edwinjm 1mo agoThis article is retracted. Read https://daringfireball.net/2026/08/retraction_app_store_rejection_of_the_week https://daringfireball.net/2026/08/retraction_app_store_reje...
- chris_fa__ 1mo ago[dead]
- rensike 1mo ago[flagged]
- martinlucas1994 1mo ago[dead]
- Studui81Labs 1mo ago[flagged]
- szidev 1mo agoWhat an insane ruling considering Co-Star is entirely an astrology app and was picked as an app store "Editor's Choice" at some point.
- Jonovono 1mo agoThey arn't against Astrology apps. It's that there are a few categories where apple has just stopped allowing new ones since there are so many.
- w10-1 1mo agoAre those documented anywhere?
- Jonovono 1mo agoSomewhat, but still very subjective. https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#spam https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#spa... You can still always get around them (at least my experience), but it just takes a lot of time
- dgellow 1mo agoThe guideline: (b) Don’t submit apps that are indistinguishable from what's already widely available. Opportunistically creating variants of existing app categories or popular apps degrades App Store discovery, reduces overall app quality, and harms both users and developers. Certain kinds of apps, such as dating, flashlight, sound effects, wallpaper, simple timers, and fortune telling, are well established on the App Store and we will not accept new submissions unless they offer a meaningfully different or improved experience. We may remove these apps from the App Store going forward if they are not updated, improved, or do not attract customers. Other kinds of apps, such as drinking games, Kama Sutra, fart, and burp apps, are mediocre, low-quality, or low-effort and do not add value to the App Store. Repeated submissions of this kind may lead to removal from the Apple Developer Program.
- Grombobulous 1mo agoThis is such a dumb policy, and it's absolutely not even being followed. I submitted a timer app this year and it got approved. It's literally just a slightly more feature-rich timer. I made this as a "my first app" type of experience. Never at any point was the quality of my app questioned, and I'm the first person who will tell you that it's not very good.
- Jonovono 1mo ago
- edwinjm 1mo agoI am quite an Apple fan, but this dampens my enthusiasm considerably. How many great apps are rejected, but build by people without reach?
- rpdillon 1mo agoTheir business model depends on you not looking too closely here. Apple has a lot of legitimate advantages, but they oversell the safety of the App Store quite a bit, and they also have an infamous review process for apps that deliberately hides both the reasoning and any sort of estimation of false positive / false negative rate. Google should have these sort of stats as well, but obviously neither company would publish them. False negatives should be observable by the public. I'm a fan of letting users add repos from vendors they trust, so there isn't one centralized gatekeeper.
- dinkblam 1mo agooverselling the safety is very euphemistic many years ago we made a list of malware apps on the Mac App Store: https://www.corecode.io/_malware_on_the_macappstore.html https://www.corecode.io/_malware_on_the_macappstore.html (yes, the list was made after being disgruntled because totally legitimate apps were refused for nonsense reasons just like in this story)
- Grombobulous 1mo agoJust don't be a fan of corporations. Period. Even the good ones, looking at you Valve. Am I happy and satisfied customer of some companies? Yes. Not a fan, though.
- tantalor 1mo agoIs astrology not allowed in app store? That's kind of a weird thing to ban.
- gcampos 1mo agoProbably not directly, but indirect by the anti spam criteria: If there are too many similar apps, from whatever category, they will just reject new apps.
- ButlerianJihad 1mo agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychic_Friends_Network https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychic_Friends_Network https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Cleo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Cleo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edward#Crossing_Over_with_John_Edward https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edward#Crossing_Over_with... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Randi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Randi
- kbelder 1mo agoOne of those things is not like the others...
- kdot 1mo ago[flagged]
- john_strinlai 1mo agoas much as i loathe astrology, im not sure why astrology would be blanket banned in the first place. and i am surprised that apps like "Night Sky" (great app, no affiliation) made it past review if the app store reviewers are incapable of telling the difference. https://darkhours.io/ https://darkhours.io/ does look really cool, i hope they get this sorted out.
- ilikeitdark13 1mo agoWow, that is beautiful.
- quentindanjou 1mo agoThe "Astrology" reason emphasized in the article isn't the main reason, they actually quickly talk about it: > the App Review Board and the Review Board responded that they determined the original rejection was valid because, I shit you not, “We understand that the app includes a live tarot reading feature.” So that's it, they need to remove the live tarot reading. Which to me while not being astrology, isn't much better.
- postalcoder 1mo agoThere is no live tarot feature. Thats the point.
- robertjpayne 1mo agoDid you read the article the app contains no such thing anywhere it’s an astronomy app not astrology and is deeply rooted in real science
- john_strinlai 1mo agoi put tarot + astrology in the same bucket (and, it appears after some quick searches, so do astrologers and tarot-readers or however you call them) >So that's it, they need to remove the live tarot reading. dark hours doesnt have live tarot reading.
- rcstank 1mo ago
- arjie 1mo agoI wonder what the internals of the App Store process are. For most app approval processes you can tell because you'll get connections from the Philippines etc. so I assume what's going on here is that these reviewers have a range of English proficiency with a median below what an American developer is used to. Then the rest is just hallucination from the human, guessing at what they're looking at.
- ceejayoz 1mo agoAll of my app review submissions come back at like 2-3am, so yeah. We had a client whose website geoblocked non-US IPs and failed several rounds of review until we gave up and put a copy of their privacy policy on S3.
- arjie 1mo agoI had my privacy policy on a Lovable site. The embedded browser UI for the reviewer didn’t render JS and they would say I didn’t have a privacy policy. Took forever to figure out but tbh it’s my fault: the privacy policy should be visible on no JS.
- drcongo 1mo agoReject this, but allow a billion spammy gambling scam apps pride of place in App Store searches. Gross.
- aliasxneo 1mo agoIn my last SRE role I was the unfortunate victim of having to maintain a mobile app submitted to both the Android and iOS app stores. I would never wish it on my worst enemy. It was the one thing that I could absolutely _not_ guarantee any sort of reliability with. It was all up to the random person who happened to review the current release and the release process could be as quick as a day in the best circumstances or up to two weeks if we got a particularly difficult reviewer. They seem to have absolutely no context sharing between reviews.
- port11 1mo agoThey’re bureaucrats interpreting the law as they see fit. We’ve had updates blocked because the word Android was mentioned in our in-app change-log.
- wookmaster 1mo agoThis was my biggest shock when I decided to publish an app...there's no SLA they just do it whenever they feel apparently. Excitedly publish a very simple app to have it sit in queue for like 6 days was surprising.
- lapcat 1mo agoFrom https://www.seattletimes.com/business/technology/apples-tightly-controlled-app-store-is-teeming-with-scams/ https://www.seattletimes.com/business/technology/apples-tigh... > In a sworn deposition in the Epic lawsuit, Phillip Shoemaker, the former head of the App Review team, said employees in his department generally did not have a technical background in computer coding. They needed to know how to use a Mac and an iPhone, he said. > “Qualifications were that they could breathe, they could think,” he said. And they typically worked at the Apple “Genius Bar” at the company’s retail stores. It typically took about 13 minutes to review a new app, Shoemaker said in the deposition.
- ceejayoz 1mo agoThey're likely just ticking boxes on a checklist - does the app crash, does the app have a privacy policy, does the app permit chat? Nothing about level one app review should need coding skills. Appeals, maybe, but even there, it's almost never about the code.
- Grombobulous 1mo agoThis isn't really a bad thing. That's exactly what you want from an app reviewer. You want someone who has critical thinking skills but is looking at the app from the perspective of a typical customer. Anything involving technical code review of apps on Apple's scale should be automated anyway.
- lapcat 1mo ago> has critical thinking skills That's not what the court testimony said. Could think does not imply could think critically, especially not when preceded by "could breathe", which is an absurdly low bar. Might as well say, "not literally dead".
- Grombobulous 1mo agoYou just chopped off the other part of the sentence to change the meaning. > “Qualifications were that they could breathe, they could think,” he said. “They could think” implies critical thinking skills. Then the next sentence says they usually work at the Genius Bar, which is not at all an entry level role.
- TooSmugToFail 1mo agoDamn. What a shocking level of incompetence. Has Apple really sunk that low?
- rpdillon 1mo agoThis kind of thing reminds me of why I've always felt there shouldn't be a gatekeeper. Add your repos, install your apps. Folks should be allowed to have more than one repo to install apps from.
- iamnothere 1mo agoBut if you allow users to have freedom, grandma will get hacked! We should all be told what to do and where to go and rely on gatekeepers for permission, for safety. (And no, of course there’s not any solution that would allow competent individuals to go outside the safe zone.)
- ceejayoz 1mo agoThere's a saying about how hard it can be to design bear-resistant containers: > There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists. The same is true for computers. Solutions that "allow competent individuals" to do something are also typically solutions scammers can convince Grandma to perform without understanding what they do. (Case in point: I saw a fake captcha that told you to open Terminal and paste a command to "prove" you're human; https://www.reddit.com/r/mac/comments/1rq4bh6/warning_suspicious_captcha/ https://www.reddit.com/r/mac/comments/1rq4bh6/warning_suspic...)
- iamnothere 1mo agoExactly, computers should only be allowed to do what expert gatekeepers deem safe. There is no possible way to allow competent users to bypass this. Even if they had to go submit a blood sample and sign a document in front of a judge, grandma would just do it anyway! Lock it all down and make sure that compilers require a government license.
- ceejayoz 1mo agoThe flip side of this is: Pro: I can use a convoluted process to install an astronomy app Apple didn't like. Con: Billions of dollars of life savings siphoned off with devastating consequences. I'm by no means a maximalist on either side of this, but technologists aren't the only ones who get a say here.
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]
- swe_dima 1mo agoIt's why I love React Native and over the air updates. So I don't have to deal with this roulette.
- Kim_Bruning 1mo agoI wonder how many people are turned off by iOS and have never bothered to learn to write an app for it in the first place?
- fylo 1mo agoI guest it wasn't "in the cards" for me
- DrJokepu 1mo ago> But that’s not what happened at all. Godier proceeded through a series of escalations up to the App Review Board and the Review Board responded that they determined the original rejection was valid because, I shit you not, “We understand that the app includes a live tarot reading feature.” > It has no tarot function, no horoscopes, and nothing that I, or anyone else I’ve asked, would associate with astrology. I have dealt with the Byzantine App Store bureaucracy before. What you do here, is you submit a new version, pretty much identical to the previous one, with the comment “tarot function removed”.
- midtake 1mo agoBut then you're lying. Why not add the comment "no tarot function" without reference to whether it existed in the past? A bit confusing because it's a trivial and seemingly unrelated statement but at least then you wouldn't be lying.
- modzu 1mo agobecause it would be rejected again
- ASalazarMX 1mo ago"Tarot function is not present in this version, and won't be present in any releases future ever".
- recursive 1mo agoThat makes it sound like they made a mistake.
- twostorytower 1mo agoThey did.
- 1mo ago
- par 1mo agoMany years ago, like in 2017, my wife and I designed a dating app that was based on astrological matching. We knew it was tongue in cheek and advertised at as such. At that time we got a clear rejection from the App Store that they were no longer going to allow astrology apps. Fair enough, we pivoted the dating app to something else and it has been in the store doing fine for years now. But what we noticed was sometime around 2020, all of a sudden apple allowed a huge influx of new astrology apps into the store. It made no sense to us and seemed like bullshit, but what can you do?
- kyle-rb 1mo agoThe arbitrariness of app store review hasn't been the greatest on the Google side, for me lately anyway. I got dinged for having an E-rating for my TV show info app that displays an official promo image for an episode of Landman, where a character has a wound with some blood on his face. I pointed out that there were a couple other E-rated apps that show the exact same image, and many more T-rated ones that only warn of "In-App Purchases" — no "Violence" label. One of the latter is the official Google TV app [0], so I sent some screenshots of that, and asked if maybe they were "crushing the competition" by avoiding their own review process, to see if that would escalate my case (no such luck). [0] The image is still the same in the Google TV app, and Google Search surfaces the image in question S1 E10: https://www.google.com/search?q=landman+season+1 https://www.google.com/search?q=landman+season+1
- cdrnsf 1mo agoBuilding web apps is far more enjoyable if only because you don't have to deal with the capricious nature of Apple's App Store review. It's non-deterministic CI at best.
- cageface 1mo agoThis is true but if you want to monetize it then there are similar review hurdles you're going to have to clear.
- RagnarD 1mo agoThe most evil (yes) thing about the rejection is that the same stupid wrong misinformation about the app continued to be rubber-stamped as it propagated forward in what should be increasing levels of actual scrutiny and attention. They are lying to call it a review - it's mindless rubber-stamping either by design or because Apple employs people who just can't be bothered to do their jobs.
- nullishdomain 1mo agoI've published both iOS and visionOS apps, and my favorite rejection came from visionOS. When you click a link to open it in Safari, the system uses an existing Safari window if available. The app was rejected because the link didn’t work... the reviewer had Safari open somewhere outside their field of view. Approved on appeal :)
- whywhywhywhy 1mo agoThe concept of computers that for programs to run on them need to be submitted to a committee who decides if the users computer can run it or not felt like where the tides were going for a long time. Post AI this starts to feel absurd and look if OpenAI release a hardware device with an App Store will the process be days to weeks of review or will it be vibe code it in 40 minutes hit publish and it’s available to every device in 2 minutes? Yeah think software is thankfully going towards a world where bureaucracy isn’t respected. The apple decides what the box or square in your hand can do era is over.
- underlipton 1mo ago[flagged]
- guessbest 1mo agoThis is funny because they aren't approving anything right now Developers are wondering if they are the only ones on their forums: https://developer.apple.com/forums/topics/app-store-distribution-and-marketing https://developer.apple.com/forums/topics/app-store-distribu...
- sandoze 1mo agoIt's been selective for sure. I have a macOS app that has been approved within a day. There are two apps I submit for a client both have cleared review twice in the past two weeks within 24 hours. On the other hand I have a personal iOS app that normally doesn't take long to approve that's been waiting two weeks.
- moonlighter 1mo agoThey are, but times vary between the iOS vs. the Mac App Store. I recently submitted a new app to the Mac App Store and it took about one week to get initially approved (with one rejection because I had the word "Mac" in the app description (they said it's redundant since they're all Mac apps anyway...). Could've been a quick regex check in the form submission, but anyway, after the initial approval any subsequent feature submission afterwards usually got approved within 2-3 hours, same day, which is pretty good IMHO.
- KingMob 1mo agoHuh. Do they share review staff with Apple Pay certification? We've been waiting for 6 weeks, with complete silence from Apple.
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]
- MerrimanInd 1mo agoIt's a massive problem that mobile apps are most users favorite way to consume programs yet are one of the few forms of distribution being gatekept by two massive and opinionated companies. It feels like the slow creeping rot at the foundation of the premise (and promise) of technology and the internet. Which makes this a good time to remind everyone about the Keep Android Open movement: https://keepandroidopen.org/ https://keepandroidopen.org/ > "Starting in 2027*, a silent update, nonconsensually pushed by Google, will block every Android app whose developer hasn't registered with Google, signed their contract, paid up, and handed over government ID."
- dd8601fn 1mo agoThat might be backwards. Like maybe people are so much more willing to even look at your mobile app because they got it from one of those two opinionated companies. Whatever friction that causes for app publishers, it seems to generally work for users.
- namanaggarwal 1mo agoHonestly, reading this, I kinda feel they have an AI integration in the review tool, which hallucinate and tell them it’s Astrology and employees at that level don’t want to go against that judgement
- stuart78 1mo agoI've been waiting for several days on my MacOS app review. After many successful releases, somebody has decided to nitpick the App description. Fixed and resubmitted. Then, another rejection for some other related aspect of the description. Fixed and resubmitted, now waiting on next review. I'm good to make the description complaint, of course, but it seems the reviewer immediately halts as soon as they encounter any issue. Would have been nice to get both feedback points on the first response, especially given how long it can take to get back to the top of the queue. At the end of the day, I regret my choice to use the App Store at all.
- eek2121 1mo agoMy immediate thought upon clicking the link referenced in the article, is that the first thing I see is at first glance looks like astrological signs taking up the entire height of the page. I'm not defending Apple at all (I'm a developer, I've not specifically worked on apps for iDevices, however I've worked closely with those that take our platforms and tie them into those apps at many companies and startups) I've also not finished reading the article, however right away, based on what I've read, I see the problem. Apple reviews a thousands upon thousands of apps a day, and the folks reviewing those apps (and now, AI) aren't going to continue to review an app when they see a potential violation. It is up to the app developer to be clear and concise. Apple is a pain to deal with, I get that. However, I see why it was rejected. Continuing to read the article now. EDIT: read the rest of it. My take is that they are probably employing AI based upon the odd response (which is dumb, also note, Apple has been using forms of machine learning for years to assist with this stuff. When I say AI, I specifically refer to LLMs). Something that I think folks really need to pay attention to, however, is the first impression. The app reviewer doesn't just hit a reject button and call it a day. They take notes. Notes that aren't shared with you, just among folks that may review it again in the future. When it is re-reviewed, those notes are taken into consideration and given a ton of weight. That is why it is important to give a perfect presentation the first time around. If you have 30 seconds to re-review an app that was rejected and you have notes (and possibly a screenshot or two? I don't know if Apple does that part) of what was presented during the previous review, you aren't going to do a whole bunch of investigating if it looks like nothing has changed. You have deadlines that impact your performance review, you will move on and rubber stamp the re-review. The next level up will take slightly longer, etc.
- Handy-Man 1mo agoWell then you clearly should have read it first. As it kept getting escalated and went to review board and was still rejected stating first review was correct.
- burnte 1mo ago> My immediate thought upon clicking the link referenced in the article, is that the first thing I see is at first glance looks like astrological signs taking up the entire height of the page. Sadly this is unavoidable as constellations are used in astronomy and astrology. They both also use letters and numbers. That doesn't mean they're the same thing. > Something that I think folks really need to pay attention to, however, is the first impression. The app reviewer doesn't just hit a reject button and call it a day. With respect I think you need to reread the actual blog post about the app rejection. It's pretty clear the app reviewer took a quick look and rejected it without any understanding at all. I don't know why you think these reviewers are so conscientious, they're line workers and sometimes they just get sick of the grind and it's easy to reject. They're human.
- sneak 1mo agoThe worst part is that for all of this, the App Store is still absolutely chock full of fraud apps, scam apps, and malware. They deny great apps, fail to fix their mistakes, and leave heaps and heaps of actively malicious apps in place, in the top 40 in every category. And we pay them 10x cc processing fees (30% instead of 3%) for this. It’s pure rentseeking bullshit, and it goes against everything that made Apple Apple. It’s an actual tragedy.
- atorodius 1mo ago> We understand that the app includes a live tarot reading feature I don’t understand why tarot reading apps are banned, can someone enlighten me?
- ceejayoz 1mo agoApple has extremely/problematically vague guidelines about what constitutes spammy apps. https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#design https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#des... > Don’t submit apps that are indistinguishable from what's already widely available. Opportunistically creating variants of existing app categories or popular apps degrades App Store discovery, reduces overall app quality, and harms both users and developers. Certain kinds of apps, such as dating, flashlight, sound effects, wallpaper, simple timers, and fortune telling, are well established on the App Store and we will not accept new submissions unless they offer a meaningfully different or improved experience.
- wildredkraut 1mo agoWhat's so bad about tarot cards? I put it into the same pot as all the other religious stuff, all just believes.
- martinclayton 1mo agoThe words astro-nomy and astro-logy are similar, but this is no "fluke". There's a Wikipedia article with some history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrology_and_astronomy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrology_and_astronomy I imagine astronomers have been sighing resignedly at dinner parties for a couple of millenia: In the Hellenistic world, the Greek words 'astrologia' and 'astronomia' were often used interchangeably, but they were conceptually not the same. In his compilatory work Etymologiae [c. 625], Isidore of Seville noted explicitly the difference between the terms astronomy and astrology (Etymologiae, III, xxvii) and the same distinction appeared later in the texts of Arabian writers.
- dingaling 1mo agoYes, when I introduce my interests to new people these days I say "night-sky watching", instead of astronomy, just to avoid this problem. "Astronomy? You don't really believe in all that nonsense do you? Jane, this guy believes those horoscopes in the paper!" Sigh
- NetMageSCW 1mo agoWhy did you change to enable the ignorant?
- ButlerianJihad 1mo agoPerhaps try and not collide your app's exact name with a horror survival video game [2024: Steam, Xbox, Playstation] that involves a trickster demonic clown who tosses mysterious game-changing cards at you? I mean, I'm just guessing here. [Spoiler alert: I asked Gemini LLM to cut to the chase] https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3362343134 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=33623... TRICKSTER This entity is a demon-like clown that plays tricks on its victims. It is accompanied by Jack n Boxes that are triggered by cards he leaves around that offer good and bad results - the good result being the box that has a symbol that relates to the card you pick up. Instead of just killing you when he catches up, you have to go through what I call a "Just Dance" challenge. Hit the WASD, or whatever your keybinds are, when the indication reaches the box. We ran into an interesting situation. After long hours we could not get the escape key in the egyptan level. We have a clown, where we have to follow the cards. We can obtain every fuse, we finsih with the objectives, but there are not any card left to find, and the exit key was not it the middle of the lasers ( a mystery card was there). And one additional info, we also could not found the key for administrator 1... any suggestion ? https://www.darkhours-thegame.com/ https://www.darkhours-thegame.com/ This is just one property named "Dark Hours"; there are horror films and mystery novels, and while it's a cromulent name for astronomy, just looking at the name gave me feelings of spiritualism or prophecy, on top of those cool nights watching Perseids with Dad and sister, in the flat field. https://nic.io/whois-search.htm?domain_name=darkhours.io https://nic.io/whois-search.htm?domain_name=darkhours.io Your website, darkhours dot io, is six days old. That is, it was created on August 1st, and it was not spotted by web.archive.org, until August 2, 2026. So your "Dark Hours" naming is really, really late to the game, so to speak. You should change your name before the game-makers of "Piece of Cake Studio" find you and send a cease and desist to change your domain name, before .io registrar revokes it, which appears to be in Colorado and/or the British Indian Ocean, for all intents and purposes.
- darkhours 1mo agoThank you for this. The studio's name isn't the only coincidece: https://github.com/mbeher2200/DarkHours https://github.com/mbeher2200/DarkHours, his app is very similar to my open source project.
- vondur 1mo agoThe whole thing is stupid. If people want to get an Astrology app, who is Apple to say they won't carry it?
- theturtletalks 1mo agoIt’s a shame that all these people that are using AI to code are using it to make iOS apps. Even the open-source ones are nice but you can’t install yourself unless you pay $99/year to Apple. Why not just make a great web app that does that job? I have a terminal in the web app that I use to code on my laptop. I wanted to make a native app for my phone, but using Tailscale and just accessing the website on my phone is way better and I’m not dependent on app stores at all.
- catuscubitus 1mo ago> It’s actually exquisitely well-designed and painstaking crafted. It’s exactly the sort of app that the App Store ought to celebrate and highlight. Exactly what I thought at some point. Apple, or whoever they outsource their app store reviews to, certainly try hard to beat that kind of idealism out of people. I let my developer subscription run out and moved on to make web apps only. Never looked back.
- another-account 1mo agoDaaaaaaaaamn
- ungreased0675 1mo agoAt first I wondered if this was caused by a language barrier caused by outsourcing app review somewhere where labor is as cheap as possible. Then I read more and realized it was just stupidity.
- erichocean 1mo agoIt took 90 days earlier this year for our venture-backed business to get approved by Apple merely for a corporate developer account, with all documentation available at the beginning of the process. They are insanely, glacially slow.
- micromacrofoot 1mo agoIt's a fine app, but I'm not sure why gruber is glazing it so hard... is he not able to spot something so clearly built by AI? it's one of the better ones but it's got all the hallmarks. I'd be surprised if it's maintained a year from now.
- scared_together 1mo agoIs Gruber actually against AI-built apps? He was against the unofficial Mac port of Notepad++ but that had many problems other than being AI-assisted.
- micromacrofoot 1mo agoit feels odd to me to praise it as beautifully crafted without mentioning that it's essentially stock AI aesthetics to me craft is a human quality, I don't look at Ikea cabinets and praise their craft for example, and I'll admit that some of them are quite nice... it's just not the same process
- duxup 1mo agoI’ve developed iOS and Android apps, store approvals are always a crap shoot, and it’s not just approvals, it’s paperwork… sudden rejections over something that was fine months earlier and getting pointed to a document that could mean ANYTHING. I got rejected with a screenshot from an app that doesn’t have anything like the screenshot, it took me several rejections to realize someone reviewer watched some old YouTube video I submitted ages ago and didn’t like something that was fine before…. They have a login where they can see the first page , I gave it to them , but they chose to reject because of an old video. I recently signed up for a personal dev account for the play store and I have to get 12 friends with android devices to “test” it before they’ll consider my app at all… That is to say I have to go online and horse trade with 12 people (hell if I know who these people are or what their unapproved apps do…) and get them to test mine if I test theirs. That alone is suspicious kinda behavior but google all but requires it now. Meanwhile on my work account I’m publishing just fine.
- nickndegwa 1mo agoDreading releasing my app to the stores, phew!
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]
- justinhj 1mo agoThe author is right, the website is nice, but I am having trouble finding my star sign.
- dtagames 1mo agoWhat's wrong here is that Apple decided devs need their permission to install standard web tech apps on Apple devices. Apple is anti-dev, pro control of the income stream, and only interested in supporting devs that are all in on the cult. The fact that the dev made a web version with all the same functionality just proves we don't need an app store nor Apple to gatekeep it.
- darkhours 1mo agoHere's my open source project with the same name and feature set. Super coincidental. Mine's free - and has some clever hacks I put in for location routing that this one doesn't. It was hard to figure out and required engineering that's not a part of the public code base. The source code and commit history can be seen here. https://github.com/mbeher2200/DarkHours https://github.com/mbeher2200/DarkHours
- classified 1mo ago> The App Store is not a functioning system. Sad to say this, but this has been known since forever.
- VCFundedGenYer 1mo agoStuff like this is always why I ruthlessly and aggressively push back against any Apple fanboyism claiming that the App Store protects users or makes them safer somehow. This kind of behavior from Apple is unacceptable. Sideloading needs to be forced upon them.
- NetMageSCW 1mo agoBoth can be true.
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 1mo ago"The App Store is not a functioning system."
- NetMageSCW 1mo agoTIL Apple doesn’t know the difference between Astronomy and Astrology.
- ghusbands 1mo agoThe article now says "[UPDATE, SATURDAY 8 AUGUST: Consider this entire story retracted for now. Details forthcoming.]"
- decimalenough 1mo agoThe blog post has been retracted in full, for the very good reason that it apparently was in fact an astrology app complete with tarot readings and other (I quote) "occultist horseshit". https://daringfireball.net/2026/08/retraction_app_store_rejection_of_the_week https://daringfireball.net/2026/08/retraction_app_store_reje...
- martinlucas1994 28d ago[flagged]