Arodex

5 ms·

1.
by Arodex 3d ago
He is literally doing the "Yes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders" bit but without any irony.
2.
by Arodex 3d ago
Because they reflect their creators' values.
3.
by Arodex 3d ago
>One conference speaker, Grindr CEO George Arison, told the BBC he believed this week's comments from Coxon and others were indicative of an "anti-civilisational worldview at Anthropic". >He called them "dangerous&
4.
by Arodex 5d ago
>Judge the current US policy by the current US. Then it is obvious we need to preemptively nuke the USA right now.
5.
by Arodex 5d ago
It gave demoralized soldiers an excuse to flee rather than fight. Nobody was going to question the reprieve offered by an order to retreat, even fake.
6.
by Arodex 5d ago
What good has done his pardon? Was it done out of policy, or just because Ulbricht paid for it with his hidden stash of crypto? Is trying to buy hitmen to assassinate someone something that Ulbricht regrets and will never try again? (It is
7.
Ross Ulbricht (Silk Road founder) talks at RNC convention(youtube.com)
5 points by Arodex 5d ago|3 comments
8.
by Arodex 5d ago
I found it weird that nobody had yet made a mention of this, given how Silk Road was often a big topic on HN...
9.
by Arodex 6d ago
We don't have any idea what's inside Americans'head when they voted again for Trump. We should preemptively nuke America now.
10.
by Arodex 6d ago
Uh, what? Communists and especially Soviets were big on Feminism. American women were supposed to be perfect housewives.
11.
by Arodex 6d ago
This article says exactly the opposite: everything was completely coherent and known within the CIA. The information gathered on student leaders and members by the supposedly "liberal, nonviolent and honorable" side was never kept
12.
by Arodex 6d ago
Then you don't say stuff like “In my experience The Agency was completely different from its image; it was liberal, nonviolent and honorable”. It is not "guilt by association" anymore, it is pure complicity.
13.
by Arodex 6d ago
Funny that you wake up and rise only now. Where was you righteous indignation when Republicans promises tax cuts? Can you point me to your contemporary reaction to "no tax on tips"? What made you react only now?
14.
by Arodex 7d ago
Yes it is different: he conditioned it on voting for him. And he is not claiming to improve any governmental system to finance this, like other politicians do when they promise welfare or tax cuts: he is saying the money is there, he is the
15.
by Arodex 7d ago
What is being "overeducated"? What is exactly your belief that knowing as much stuff as possible is a "bad" thing? And what are you doing on Hacker News then? And could you point where I do "punch what I consider be
16.
by Arodex 7d ago
If you want to live in a world where brown people are banned from living in France that's your opinion but I will disagree with you.
17.
by Arodex 7d ago
Then OpenAI should acknowledge that they can't prove they solved the problem independently, and credit the external researchers. It cuts both ways: if OpenAI really needs to access user data, even anonymised, to improve its models, the
18.
by Arodex 7d ago
Then OpenAI should acknowledge that they can't prove they solved the problem independently, and credit the external researchers. It cuts both ways: if OpenAI really needs to access user data, even anonymised, to improve its models, the
19.
by Arodex 7d ago
The accused party fails to answer half the questions and makes direct threats. I would say the accuser has already collected enough proof to trigger an investigation.
20.
by Arodex 8d ago
But I can subpoena my neighbours bank account when I see him driving a brand new 500'000$ car and I have a 490'000$ hole in my bank account and he works in the bank where my money is. And when questioned he evades some questions a
21.
by Arodex 8d ago
But the evidence is in the hand of the potential culprit. That's why allegations can be enough to force confiscation and intrusion to get evidence in safe hands before it is destroyed by the accused party.
22.
by Arodex 8d ago
So the AI companies are not only stealing existing knowledge. They are also stealing research to "snipe" actual researchers out and steal their social credit. Who still wants to use AI to solve cancer and other major problems?
23.
by Arodex 8d ago
Evidence or argument that the Nazi were "far-right" during the interwar period, and that it isn't a modern categorization: basic knowledge of History. Where did the Nazi sit in the Reichsrat? And the Italian fascists in the I
24.
by Arodex 8d ago
Washing your hands is not only about your own health, it is also about other people's health. Maybe you could get the same quality of life improvement without decreasing other's.
25.
by Arodex 8d ago
It's unclear. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/sep/23/medicalscience.wo... My point was more that articles like the one on the BBC (or the Guardian for that matter) just contradict themselves eve
26.
Pâro: The feeling that everything you do is somehow wrong(youtube.com)
1 points by Arodex 8d ago|0 comments
27.
by Arodex 8d ago
... Wasn't there papers and articles showing getting in contact with soil was causing Parkinson's? Feeling some pâro, again: https://youtu.be/w7l2hUp0CkQ
28.
by Arodex 9d ago
>Undemocratically outlawing the opposition to secure the vote... You are cute in thinking your argument holds, but they were not that far (33, 37%) without outlawing the opposition - which were communists directed by Stalin . You profes
29.
by Arodex 9d ago
In 1933 the main problem for people was the Jews. Should the mainstream parties have "solved" the "Jewish problem" in place of the Nazis? I am not inventing the term BTW, it was a major topic of the interwar period: htt
30.
by Arodex 9d ago
>At the time they were not far right/left though. We are applying that label in hindsight compared to present day politics. Oh my god, man, how much of a know-nothing are you? And how do you expect your lies to get a pass when I kn

More ›