albedoa

6 ms·

1.
by albedoa 7d ago
Never stop posting, you are doing great.
2.
by albedoa 7d ago
Oh ya? Is that why the parent prefaced that obvious and indisputable fact with "IMO"?
3.
by albedoa 8d ago
We are giving you an opportunity to correct yourself. You are instead trying to make your nonsensical statement make sense. Not only does the first part of your sentence literally contradict the second part: > We don't have enough a
4.
by albedoa 15d ago
It's wild to watch you lecture someone who just made you aware of the topic that you are lecturing him about.
5.
by albedoa 16d ago
> These are boomer-tier talking points Add to your excellent takedown the implication that any of us can walk into a school with our résumé and ask for a teaching interview. It's the most meme-ified of the boomer memes presented uni
6.
by albedoa 18d ago
It is unfathomably weird of you to post like a raving lunatic and then get pissy when we downvote you.
7.
by albedoa 21d ago
> You're not paying to use HN. Oh for sure man, this absolutely looks like you were only concerned and talking about paid services: > Broad and perpetual license over inputs and outputs, and even your name and profile picture.
8.
by albedoa 26d ago
That quote supports the claim being made by the person who you are calling wrong.
9.
by albedoa 29d ago
Even the staunchest libertarians disagree with your understanding. Embarrassed that anyone holds or ever held this view, they have left you behind.
10.
by albedoa 1mo ago
Yes, that commenter is lost.
11.
by albedoa 1mo ago
Also: "What do you mean everybody at this party is a Nazi? They seem uninterested in politics, and they have been so welcoming to me!"
12.
by albedoa 1mo ago
Ignoring the other side of the equation is a pretty wild thing for you to do here: > I'm running it in Oh My Pi with a second instance running as "advisor" and even with 5-6 active sessions (effectively 12 streams)
13.
by albedoa 1mo ago
The article claims multiple times that the cops used the interstate travel as a pretext for the search that turned up the marijuana, but in most jurisdictions, the arrest would have allowed them to inventory the car anyway as part of the im
14.
by albedoa 1mo ago
How were any of us meant to know that you were using your own personal and undisclosed definition of a well-established phrase?
15.
by albedoa 2mo ago
> Why? >> Slavery > Yes it's bad. Are you just learning about the slavery or did you know about it when you asked why.
16.
by albedoa 2mo ago
> or want to cook before the IPO What IPO is that?
17.
by albedoa 2mo ago
> He could not see the note we were talking about because he is colorblind. A similar thing happened to a friend who was over for game night. We were playing the Monopoly Deal card game when he put a brown and a red card next to each oth
18.
by albedoa 2mo ago
Literally the point is that sites are showing the banner by default practice even when they are not tracking. You understand this! Your kind comes into every one of these threads and says some version of "well if they weren't trac
19.
by albedoa 2mo ago
Wow that's so deep man.
20.
by albedoa 2mo ago
That is the point being made.
21.
by albedoa 2mo ago
> I suppose I agree with you that any nuanced discussion is impossible. I didn't say that. My politics probably align with yours, and I agree that a nuanced discussion on this topic is likely impossible on HN. But asking the model t
22.
by albedoa 2mo ago
You really detracted from your point and killed any hope for a nuanced discussion by begging the question. You could have simply asked the model which system is more efficient.
23.
by albedoa 2mo ago
OP referenced the roof rule by name in the OP, which was quoted in the comment that you are replying to. What do you mean "an entirely different topic"?
24.
by albedoa 2mo ago
Pause and consider the joint probability that anything was autocorrected to "roof rule" and that it just so happens to be the name of one of their rules.
25.
by albedoa 2mo ago
I'm almost on board with what you're saying, except Photoshop had a two-decade advantage both in its technological advancement and in becoming the industry standard, including by infiltrating schools and being pirated by students
26.
by albedoa 2mo ago
It's unfathomably weird of you to frame an article as a source for your claim and then wait for someone to point out that the article does not support your claim before admitting that the source is actually a book that you haven't
27.
by albedoa 2mo ago
> it's the same infinite music library No it's not. That is absurdly wrong. You can ignore whoever led you to believe it. > I get that artists aren't paid enough, but it's better than the $0 they get from piracy. I
28.
by albedoa 2mo ago
> I wasn't sure if this post was lamenting the loss of discovery or the loss of stable revenue streams for artists. I haven't read the article yet, but the most devastating loss was the catalog itself. It was the largest archiv
29.
by albedoa 2mo ago
The point is very clear to the rest of us. You inserted the word "full" where the author was not talking about full agency. It's hard to believe that you don't follow.
30.
by albedoa 2mo ago
What do you mean "i don't think so"? What is it about the comment you are replying to that you don't think?

More ›