5 ms·
What about the several people worldwide who don't want to use LLMs to program?
by voidUpdate 3mo ago
What about the several people worldwide who don't want to use LLMs to program?
- cryptonym 3mo agoThey also "reap huge benefits from the tight feedback loop that the compiler provides". When something is easier/requires less context, it tends to work well for both human and LLM.
- vips7L 3mo agoI've noticed this a lot in LLM generated Java. Since it doesn't know what can or can't be null it tends to wrap everything in Optional<T>. Super strong type systems are becoming even more important.
- hedora 3mo agoYou probably need to tell it to rip as many of those out as possible (and replace them with null annotations). I've noticed LLMs sometimes pick a documented anti-pattern (passing Optional around in Java is not recommended), then amplify it (like a human might).
- vips7L 3mo agoThat's because LLMs suck.