cryptonym

7 ms·

1.
by cryptonym 6d ago
Many links are available in the article, including one to theverge. It could be limited to specific batch(es).
2.
by cryptonym 8d ago
Borrowing the work of others to replace them without crediting is the model of current AI companies. They just used that occurrence as a PR stunt but it isn't worse than the others done at scale every second.
3.
by cryptonym 10d ago
With an on premise device, the game is already lost. They may plant a separate mic device inside the TV, or elsewhere. Rooted TV doesn't really impact BnB security model.
4.
by cryptonym 13d ago
Yet you can look at RUM data (http archive tech report or other) and start noticing it's not just management.
5.
by cryptonym 13d ago
Losing the entire state happens on SPA. Plus a random error not providing any feedback is a typical SPA experience. You can poorly execute on any technology. It's just much easier to do things wrong using this-year-trendy-SPA-framework
6.
by cryptonym 13d ago
You typically still have to wait for API calls between interactions, but error handling and number of requests (linked to experience on slow connection) tend to be worse. If that's a connection-less interaction or something small that
7.
by cryptonym 14d ago
It is a problem and plays a role, then the rest of the SPA interactions are as bad. Amplified by 100+ third party scripts. Stop building SPA, go back to HTML. Re-assess every third party. For extra performance and scaling, implement cache.
8.
by cryptonym 16d ago
They just imply them not having to doesn't dismiss the original comment, thread being more about morals than laws. That being said, hoping for any financial support from AI companies would be really naive. Using others work without ret
9.
by cryptonym 16d ago
How is Alphabet not responsible this? They push ads for scams at the top and earn money from it. That should be 100% on them to reimburse, then go after the scammers.
10.
by cryptonym 20d ago
Most pizza made today are robot made in factories, it has been the case for decades. Shit-tier pizzas and didn't improve over time.
11.
by cryptonym 21d ago
It's often better to implement your caching logic at the Edge than just going with Vary support. Vanilla Vary support leads to cache dilution. Accept (and other headers you might include in vary) may take many different values that you
12.
by cryptonym 22d ago
Sure, sure. Put Zuck in jail and let's see if it's much smaller than $16 bn.
13.
by cryptonym 22d ago
You may earn 100k/y and have 10M real estate + 2M in bank. Why would you dumb down market cap to earnings? Anyway, 6K for harming children at that scale remains ridiculous.
14.
by cryptonym 22d ago
Money isn't real, yet that's how we size a lot of things.
15.
by cryptonym 1mo ago
IANAL but it looks like they saw a risk and decided to not put you, as a website owner using their free tier, at risk of breaching GDPR for RUM. That was my concern and it's addressed.
16.
by cryptonym 1mo ago
CF tested the water with polyfill.io 2 years ago. Everyone liked them modifying user's content. We are now on the "more and more" side.
17.
by cryptonym 1mo ago
For delivery service, it's typically done with a closed box so you get exactly what has been prepared. Here you told them to unpack the food and repack it (TLS termination), filtering order (WAF), reheating pre-made food (cache) and th
18.
by cryptonym 1mo ago
cloudflareinsights.com seems to be part of their list. If you see unexpected tracking, it could be worth reporting it to Mozilla.
19.
by cryptonym 1mo ago
I never said "they would violate GDPR". I was questioning if it could be the case. Someone said it's not the case as the feature is turned off in EU. Reading their blog, it also looks like they don't collect much identif
20.
by cryptonym 1mo ago
GDPR very much applies. As a website owner, you are responsible towards your users for data collection (your architectural choices, your responsibility). This was my concern on GDPR. Sibling comment says data collection is disabled in EU.
21.
by cryptonym 1mo ago
They are not collecting and using your personal data. To me (IANAL), it looks really different from LinkedIn. GDPR is about legality and covers the LinkedIn case you mention.
22.
by cryptonym 1mo ago
You are not paying and it's a business. They need to get something from this deal and they'll maximize it: marketing, data, upselling... Collecting RUM and giving you the opportunity to turn it off is not that bad for a free servi
23.
by cryptonym 1mo ago
I'm not a Cloudflare customer and don't intend to actually use their services. To be transparent I got a free account for few experiments. I'm not working for them in any way. When it's free you know you are being used,
24.
by cryptonym 1mo ago
Cloudflare needs the data. Useful to validate the impact of changes, build marketing content... Using the free tier for this is fair, they let you opt out, they give you a dashboard. If someone is mad, maybe they should pay or use a differe
25.
by cryptonym 2mo ago
You can't number every limit and corner case. You come with precise terms and give a chance for people to defend their case in court. We'll now see if "thousands of partners" is considered as a good match for "infor
26.
by cryptonym 2mo ago
The whole world would be even happier if websites stoped this nonsense tracking of every single action bloating a single webpage with 20Mb of JS, connecting to 50+ domains, impacting accessibility, data usage & interactivity.
27.
by cryptonym 2mo ago
Hide your prompt injection in terms & conditions, plain sight but totally invisible.
28.
by cryptonym 2mo ago
I have seen ISP doing CGNAT on DOD IP space.
29.
by cryptonym 2mo ago
Well... AGI by next month sounds more likely than what you are hoping for.
30.
by cryptonym 2mo ago
People tend to take $100K seriously, especially the ones who tried with more than a mere prompt injection.

More ›