6 ms·
The trend on the status page[1] does not inspire confidence. Beginning to wonder if this might be a daily thing. [1] https://status.claude.com/ https://status.
by ajb92 6mo ago
The trend on the status page[1] does not inspire confidence. Beginning to wonder if this might be a daily thing.
[1] https://status.claude.com/ https://status.claude.com/
- sh1mmer 6mo agoThey might need to do some vibe refactoring.
- aurareturn 6mo agoThey went from $9b ARR at the end of 2025 to $30b ARR today. That's more than 3x the size in 3 months. I expect growing pains. For some context, they added 2x Palantir or .75x Shopify or .68x Adobe annual revenue in March alone.
- samlinnfer 6mo agoAnd they are early adopters of the vibe coding paradigm, having a 100% Claude generated codebase.
- aurareturn 6mo agoI assume most of their outages is related to this insane scaling and lack of available compute. Vibe coding doesn't automatically mean lower quality. My codebase quality and overall app experience has improved since I started using agents to code. You can leverage AI to test as well as write new code.
- samlinnfer 6mo agoWell if we use Claude Code's code quality as a benchmark ...
- _fat_santa 6mo agoAfter the CC leak last week I took a look at their codebase and my biggest criticism is they seem to never do refactoring passes. Personally I write something like 80-90% of my code with agents now but after they finish up, it's critical that you spin up another agent to clean up the code that the first one wrote. Looking at their code it's clear they do not do this (or do this enough). Like the main file being something like 4000 LOC with 10 different functions all jammed in the same file. And this sort of pattern is all over the place in the code.
- PopePompus 6mo agoHow do you do the cleanup? Just /simplify or something you rolled yourself?
- _fat_santa 5mo agoIt's not an automated process (at least in my case). I primarily use Codex so I will do the initial pass with 5.3 or 5.4 xhigh and then cleanup with spark on medium or low. Spark is great for this kind of cleanup work because the feedback loop is so tight compared to just about anything else. It's quite hampered by a very small context window but in the context of cleanup/refactoring that's more of a feature than a bug IMHO. My suggestion for folks that want to do this is make sure you keep reasoning low. The cleanup should be very much human directed and derived from your "taste", at that point you don't want the model to think at all and just blindly do what you tell it to. You want reasoning to be just high enough so it doesn't eff up the code in the process.
- twelvechairs 6mo agoYeah its huge demand upswing from the growth of openclaw and similar pushing resources. Very clear from recent changes and announcement around this [0] Fwiw there are worse delays from second tier providers like moonshot's kimik2.5 that are also popular for agentic use. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633396 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633396
- nonameiguess 6mo agoTo be clear, this number will probably end up being reasonably accurate, but it is a pet peeve nonetheless in the startup world how shitty these financial metrics have become. We're three months from the end of 2025. You'd think we'd want to see at least two years of $30 billion dollar revenue earned in each year before we say with any meaningful level of statistical validity that they have $30 billion in "annual recurring" revenue.
- rpozarickij 6mo agoIt's also worth keeping in mind that Anthropic's compute needs are nothing like those of a company like Shopify or Adobe, so revenue might not paint accurately enough the picture of what they're dealing with right now.
- skippyboxedhero 6mo agoIt has been a daily thing for 2-3 months.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- cube00 5mo agoThey've also stopped reporting on the causes too, just "it's resolved" and they move on.