skippyboxedhero

8 ms·

1.
by skippyboxedhero 18d ago
it isn't undemocratic, the purpose of the system is to produce governments that are able to govern look at the last few governments, now imagine that we had a system that meant it was impossible to form a government if the government w
2.
by skippyboxedhero 18d ago
No, they don't. Turnout in the UK has dropped significantly because it doesn't matter who you vote for, the outcome is the same.
3.
by skippyboxedhero 22d ago
There is a massive price war going on. All of these Chinese companies are publicly listed and exist outside the hype bubble required to ship Dario's dogshit paper onto the pauper's pension fund.
4.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
Since the late 60s there has been explicit federal legislation. I assume you meant this as a rhetorical question but there is a definite answer because the US is a transparent system. Law is passed, the courts enforce. The fact that you are
5.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
The inability to conceive of a country where these things would happen and you would have no idea that it had ever happened...and, perhaps more importantly, wouldn't care that you didn't know.
6.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
Tibet, Manchuria, it should be somewhat obvious that a nation that is as ethnically diverse as China was not a nation borne out of lots of different people deciding simultaneously that they would like to create a country together. What is m
7.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
Compel? I am confused, all data in China is held in datacentres which the state has full access to, that is the terms of their operation and why some big tech US companies didn't want to operate in China. They don't need to "
8.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
Because the revenue of Chinese AI companies is small. Anthropic's annual run rate is $50bn, z.ai's is $500m.
9.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
Yes, it does. If you read it properly you will see that policy is to treat accusations of racism as accurate whenever they are made. The reason why the police didn't act was because he was accused of being a racist. Again, I am not sur
10.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
The policy document is linked.
11.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
No, you don't. That is the issue. You are trying to link this to people who believe in a completely unrelated issue. The only place this connection exists in your own mind. Do you understand how odd this looks to someone who doesn&#x27
12.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
As I explained, you should search for it. I said this because the process of searching for views that disprove your feelings would be beneficial for you. You seem to suggest that I intended to provide you with evidence...I specifically said
13.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
https://www.hampshire.police.uk/police-forces/hampshire-cons... - police forces across the UK have similar policies based upon this document from the NPCC - https://www.npcc.police.uk/SysSiteAssets&#x2F
14.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
Yes, there is evidence of this. Are you actually from the UK? I actually struggle to believe that anyone who is from the UK and is aware of events in the UK over the past few decades would actually be unaware this is the case. The Lawrence
15.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
The FT is a paper read by people who don't work in finance assuming that people in finance read it. It hasn't been relevant in finance or even business for many years now. You can also tell this from the comments section which has
16.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
No-one cares about your opinion (or mine). You have misunderstood my point entirely. Being non-white does not mean they are able to do their job better. That is a racist belief. The police in this case were white. But they were acting on po
17.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
"don't gather children's personal data"...wut? i love commenting on this stuff to get an insight into the mindset of people who support this...strident ignorance.
18.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
You haven't even begun to understand people who disagree with you. If you believe that what happened to George Floyd was bad, you would also believe that what happened to Nowak was bad. Saying that being appalled by police brutality to
19.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
You will need to explain this in more detail so people without racial prejudice can understand why someone's race impacts their ability to do a certain job. If they were not white, you would still have to claim there is discrimination?
20.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1270374388488167428?lang=e...
21.
by skippyboxedhero 3mo ago
This isn't how the UK works. There is a vast ecosystem of pre-crime authorities and the police are able to investigate things which aren't crimes and add "non-crime" incidents to your criminal record. It may not surprise
22.
by skippyboxedhero 4mo ago
jibecoding is the latest thing: you insult the LLM's bloodline providing it with greater motivation to complete the code you won't review without bugs.
23.
by skippyboxedhero 4mo ago
I have no idea how you can be aware of the history of Europe or the people involved with the EU and think this. It is incomprehensible. One of the most bizarre aspects of the EU is that has become a religion for people who have no idea that
24.
by skippyboxedhero 4mo ago
GDPR is innovation... I assume you don't live in the EU either...yes, there is an absolutely huge industry behind it, that is why it passed. Companies have to employ data protection officers, effectively a no-show job, and there is a w
25.
by skippyboxedhero 4mo ago
What you said comprises the exact error in logic that people make. Because we did this, this other thing is possible. The EU was a certainty in a region that is hostile to change, wants big government, wants centralization, is suspicious of
26.
by skippyboxedhero 4mo ago
That is politically impossible. Everyone knows it is impossible because if you open up some countries to free services trade then the political basis for the EU and the traditional governing countries would collapse. The limitations on trad
27.
by skippyboxedhero 4mo ago
Services trade within Europe is often less free than services trade outside of Europe. The reason why is because there is a strong political constituency within Europe to ensure that certain kinds of sinecure jobs are not impacted by compet
28.
by skippyboxedhero 4mo ago
As the other answer says, surely this would always be the case. People do not deal with government regularly and there is a strong disincentive to report upon this. I think you see the same thing in every Western democracy where people beli
29.
by skippyboxedhero 4mo ago
I would read the links in the article. The problem is that social media companies worked with civil servants in European countries to remove posts being made people outside Europe. This also happened in the UK where there were parts of the
30.
by skippyboxedhero 4mo ago
The reason Germany didn't prepare for it was because multiple leading politicians were bought and paid for by Russia. Be totally clear about that. Former German president was working for Gazprom on the project whose stated aim was to f

More ›