9 ms·

I've also heard Cory Doctorow recently offer a similarly dismissive view, describing AI as "just statistics".

• palmotea 7mo ago
  > I've also heard Cory Doctorow recently offer a similarly dismissive view, describing AI as "just statistics". Well, AI partisans have applied grandiose terms like "thinking," "intelligence," and "soul" to these machines. It's not wrong to push back and remind people what they really are.
  • keeda 7mo ago
    Well, if you look into the current scientific consensus on human cognition, our intelligence is also "just statistics." So I guess we all agree, except that some people think "just statistics" is derogatory phrasing!
    • palmotea 7mo ago
      What a software engineer comment.
    • emp17344 7mo ago
      That is absolutely not the consensus in neuroscience.
      • keeda 7mo ago
        Was thinking more about cognition than neuroscience, but sure, even there. Think of any counter-examples -- I'm guessing things like symbolic reasoning or pre-existing structures in the brain -- and then consider the origins of those concepts. Admittedly I'm an absolute layman just dabbling in this, but I could find not a single concept that cannot be traced to statistical origins. Like, symbols are essentially "vectors" of thousands of neurons firing simultaneously, and the pre-existing structures in the nervous system originate from evolution, which is a statistical process. "Just statistics", as far as I can tell! ;-)
        • deleted 6mo ago
          [deleted]
        • DrewADesign 6mo ago
          To a hammer, everything looks like a nail.