6 ms·
He fired a shitload of people, of course we can criticise him
by krageon 8mo ago
He fired a shitload of people, of course we can criticise him
- stavros 8mo agoI'm also criticizing you for not hiring the laid-off people at their former salary.
- Griffinsauce 8mo agoThree. He fired three people. Just posting the "75%" without context is a bit of an odd choice. He explains why in the podcast, but it still feels like he should have specified immediately to avoid assumptions about scale.
- lionkor 8mo agoHe himself said "75%", nowhere in that thread does he say 3 people. That's why the headline is like that.
- 306bobby 8mo ago[flagged]
- lionkor 8mo agoWhat? He could have said 3 if he wanted, but he wanted it to sound worse so he said 75. I know its inferrable how many people it is, but if the guy laying them off doesn't care to say the number, why should someone else when posting this?
- javier123454321 8mo agoBoth of those numbers in isolation dont tell the whole story. Saying firing 3 people sounds like a wednesday at a big company. Saying firing 75% of the staff indicates the impact that those changes will have on everything about the company. The latter is more useful.