12 ms·

What's going on with this plot's y-axis? https://bsky.app/profile/tylermw.com/post/3lvtac5hues2n https://bsky.app/profile/tylermw.com/post/3lvtac5hues2n

lysecret 1y ago
Couldn’t believe it was real haha
rrrrrrrrrrrryan 1y ago
This is hilarious
- moritzwarhier 1y ago
  Probably created without thinking enabled. Lower % accuracy ensues, speaking from experience.
artemonster 1y ago
[flagged]
- dang 1y ago
  Please don't post like this to Hacker News, regardless of how idiotic other people are or you feel they are. You may not owe people who you feel are idiots better, but you owe this community better if you're participating in it. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
silverquiet 1y ago
Probably generated by AI.
- Sateeshm 1y ago
  If not, the person that made the chart just got $1.5M
haffi112 1y ago
It makes it look like the presentation is rushed or made last minute. Really bad to see this as the first plot in the whole presentation. Also, I would have loved to see comparisons with Opus 4.1. Edit: Opus 4.1 scores 74.5% (https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-1 https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-1). This makes it sound like Anthropic released the upgrade to still be the leader on this important benchmark.
- danpalmer 1y ago
  > like the presentation is rushed or made last minute Or written by GPT-5?
- herval 1y ago
  They never compare with other vendors
bufferoverflow 1y ago
[dead]
ozgung 1y ago
Also this coding deception rate bar tries to decieve us. https://imgur.com/a/QkriFco https://imgur.com/a/QkriFco
- ileonichwiesz 1y ago
  It’s beyond parody that they did something like this on a slide about deception. You couldn’t make this stuff up.
TrackerFF 1y ago
After reading around, it seems like they probably forgot to update/swap the slides before presentation. The graphs were correct on their website, as they launched. But the ones they used in the presentation were probably some older versions they had forgotten to fix.

lysecret 1y ago

Couldn’t believe it was real haha

rrrrrrrrrrrryan 1y ago

This is hilarious

moritzwarhier 1y ago
Probably created without thinking enabled. Lower % accuracy ensues, speaking from experience.

artemonster 1y ago

[flagged]

dang 1y ago
Please don't post like this to Hacker News, regardless of how idiotic other people are or you feel they are. You may not owe people who you feel are idiots better, but you owe this community better if you're participating in it. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

silverquiet 1y ago

Probably generated by AI.

Sateeshm 1y ago
If not, the person that made the chart just got $1.5M

haffi112 1y ago

It makes it look like the presentation is rushed or made last minute. Really bad to see this as the first plot in the whole presentation. Also, I would have loved to see comparisons with Opus 4.1. Edit: Opus 4.1 scores 74.5% (https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-1 https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-1). This makes it sound like Anthropic released the upgrade to still be the leader on this important benchmark.

danpalmer 1y ago
> like the presentation is rushed or made last minute Or written by GPT-5?
herval 1y ago
They never compare with other vendors

bufferoverflow 1y ago

[dead]

ozgung 1y ago

Also this coding deception rate bar tries to decieve us. https://imgur.com/a/QkriFco https://imgur.com/a/QkriFco

ileonichwiesz 1y ago
It’s beyond parody that they did something like this on a slide about deception. You couldn’t make this stuff up.

TrackerFF 1y ago

After reading around, it seems like they probably forgot to update/swap the slides before presentation. The graphs were correct on their website, as they launched. But the ones they used in the presentation were probably some older versions they had forgotten to fix.