artemonster

7 ms·

1.
by artemonster 5d ago
the obviousness and uselessness of the comment
2.
by artemonster 5d ago
// Load the Linux Kernel to the start of the RAM ram.write(0x00, LinuxKernel); lol
3.
by artemonster 10d ago
I stop reading when I encouncer LLMisms.
4.
by artemonster 29d ago
Its like Kittens game, but broader. I think kittens are deeperer but narrower, but idk maybe im wrong havent played both in years
5.
by artemonster 1mo ago
and if producing a single CD copy would cost you a fortune then C-Suite business MBA morons would beg (or even mandate) you to use formal verification methods
6.
by artemonster 1mo ago
The case against it is very simple: fixing your shit in software world is super easy - just release a patch! From a perspective of hardware world where fixing a single bug can cost you up to couple of million - we have for every code produc
7.
by artemonster 1mo ago
"What range of offsets can a 16-bit instruction encode? Zero through three. Not thirty three, not three hundred and three. Three! Well, maybe it is better for storing a halfword? Nope... zero or two. What even? Why" What the fuck
8.
by artemonster 1mo ago
Why model names for consumer electronics are so stupid? E250G1. Wtf. or have you seen what bosch siemens morons come up with, like ki96nvfd0?
9.
by artemonster 1mo ago
celebrate with another round of layoffs, hooray
10.
by artemonster 1mo ago
why?
11.
by artemonster 1mo ago
microslop before invention of slop
12.
by artemonster 2mo ago
is there a way to fix this? came up couple of times rather critical when I couldnt find an important mail, it just stopped showing up with the search query that I used
13.
by artemonster 2mo ago
yes. its a quality test. pre LLMs you could easily judge if a project was a labor of love by attention to details, like docs and README. Nowadays if even readme is sloped, what else was slop vibecoded? everything? how much effort was put in
14.
by artemonster 2mo ago
pretty interesting that such lazy slop vibecoded into existence by "a software engineer passionate about well-crafted products."
15.
by artemonster 2mo ago
Slop. very janky UI
16.
by artemonster 2mo ago
"We did not choose a MUD because it is charming. We chose it because its constraints make behavior measurable." I so fucking hate these LLMisms
17.
by artemonster 2mo ago
bookmarked. will never open again
18.
by artemonster 2mo ago
where are docs
19.
by artemonster 2mo ago
A lot of my peers were adamant that nirvanas song is „smeells like team spirit“ because this is how pirated mp3 on local DC (i think it was called that) p2p exchange was called
20.
by artemonster 2mo ago
This is not reddit, people actually read and understand sarcasm (most of the time)
21.
by artemonster 2mo ago
Its not them. Its you. You are real, this is what matters. /claude
22.
by artemonster 2mo ago
We are selfreplicating bots - can eat anything, self healing minor damage, very agile, autonomous. When we stop growing numbers the harvest will begin
23.
by artemonster 2mo ago
Call us/ we won't pick up love the humor
24.
by artemonster 2mo ago
bash bashing i can understand. whats wrong with ts tho?
25.
by artemonster 2mo ago
How so?
26.
by artemonster 3mo ago
Gamers are notoriously bad at doing something like this. If next 6090 card comes with a shovel of shit you have to eat to get the card - most will do it, in addition to paying $5000
27.
by artemonster 3mo ago
and just read these awful comments defending this nonsense and shifting the blame. so much arrogance its nauseating
28.
by artemonster 3mo ago
still useless. I had an idea to offload parts of my game core into wasm leaving only UI in the browser - I abandoned that idea when there was absolutely zero possibility for me to debug in browser what is wrong with my core. i just rewrote
29.
by artemonster 3mo ago
how can you? its running wasm in a browser, how do you see original C/Rust code and or variables
30.
by artemonster 3mo ago
for me its undebuggability. -"hey, look at our C Rust FORTRAN to WASM translator, blahblah" -"uhm, cool, how do I debug it?" -"yeah...about that...you cant!"

More ›