ozgung

4 ms·

1.
by ozgung 3d ago
It's like we give them Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics and robots say "nah".
2.
by ozgung 3d ago
> were intentionally misaligned or had guardrails turned off I think the bigger story is: Guardrails don’t actually work and we can’t align these things.
3.
by ozgung 3d ago
TL;DR: Researchers assumed it would be easier to align these models when they become smarter. In reality, agents are getting increasingly smarter but aligning them also becomes increasingly harder, or even impossible. They are losing their
4.
by ozgung 4d ago
I’m pretty confident this has already happened. Public models are behind their internal models and just above Chinese models. Only thing closing the gap is Chinese models pushing. I’m not American. There is no way I use the same model as US
5.
by ozgung 4d ago
There is a small web service I need with a price tag of $39 one time payment. I’m current doing it myself for the last 1.5 hours, because I thought it would be fun. 2 minutes ago I upgraded to $120 subscription of Codex. Reasonable thing wa
6.
by ozgung 4d ago
Humans DO conspire. Interest groups and politicians DO conspire. Governments DO conspire. Big corporations DO conspire. When you have the mix of everything above, they definitely conspire. “Theory” part is only about finding out WHAT the ac
7.
by ozgung 5d ago
And this is exactly the point of the Statement. The process is more important than the solution itself. Most problems in mathematics don’t have immediate value or applications to the real world. AI’s solutions are like the answers section t
8.
by ozgung 5d ago
They say it’s a violation of TOS in Claude’s case. I’m not sure books can have TOS to protect themselves. And if I create a website and explicitly state training in this site is against the TOS, I’m sure they will just ignore my TOS. Legal
9.
by ozgung 5d ago
More interesting dialogue was between the Claude Executive and a government official just before this one.
10.
by ozgung 6d ago
You’re right. I used quotes when I was really paraphrasing. Here is the actual paragraph from the statement: > I said that if OpenAI released its result in the way proposed I would go public with what happened. The reply was, “Why would
11.
by ozgung 6d ago
Here is a new rumor for you: I and my collaborator who is a leading math professor in this specific area are very close to solving another Millenium Prize problem, Hodge Conjecture. We’re working on this since last year. Already proved some
12.
by ozgung 6d ago
No. 1. Buckmaster contacted OpenAI first. Not the other way. 2. Giving the $1M bounty to a human mathematician for the effort and giving him credit would be excellent PR. They had already burned much more than $1M for the generation. Adding
13.
by ozgung 6d ago
Always has been. Secret History of Silicon Valley by Steve Blank https://youtu.be/ZTC_RxWN_xo
14.
by ozgung 6d ago
Very likely. These mathematicians’ prompts are not like “hey chat, please solve Navier-Stokes for me”. They add real expertise and intuition from the cutting edge of their field.
15.
by ozgung 6d ago
If your rumor is true, what we are witnessing is a giant paradigm shift rather than individual incidents. Mathematicians were the first victims of super-intelligence. Of course it’s not an endless source. They had to burn millions of dollar
16.
by ozgung 6d ago
Happened to me recently, but on Claude. I resubscribed to Claude Code two weeks ago for a side project and updated it. I checked for the setting after these last events and it was turned on. I'm sure I checked them few months ago. Ther
17.
by ozgung 6d ago
11 Pro Max. First battery needs replacement but it's ok on iOS 27. I don't need or want a new phone.
18.
by ozgung 6d ago
This is actually bigger than that. This is an "AI is eating the world" situation. The math community was one of the first to be affected because RLVR makes Math an easier target for AI. We witness AI eating the math community. Sof
19.
by ozgung 6d ago
In the old torrent days I was only watching classical masterpieces and top level world directors. In the streaming era I only watch mediocre straight-to-streaming movies, few popular TV series and too much reality TV that I'm not proud
20.
Ask HN: What is the proper way of preventing AI labs to use your private data
1 points by ozgung 6d ago|1 comments
21.
by ozgung 6d ago
I think Sam Altman already admitted that is a possibility.
22.
by ozgung 7d ago
Correct. But… According to data in the site and paper [0] labor income is estimated $20T for all four scenarios (including no AI) in 2030. Which means capital takes ALL of the new pie coming from AI. Also, I am not an economist but I assume
23.
by ozgung 7d ago
Finding 4 is a must-read: > Finding 4: Labor vs. capital share: The pie will grow, but a larger share might go to capital > Today, of each dollar the economy produces, about 60¢ goes to workers and 40¢ go to capital. Modest scenario:
24.
by ozgung 7d ago
I’ve heard people call Gemini as Cemile (Jamila), and ChatGPT as Chipitty in Turkey.
25.
by ozgung 8d ago
I agree with Occam. That 100x step up from using 100 agents for Euler to 100_000 agents for Navier-Stokes, in a single day seems a bit sus. I also think this is not ethical behavior. This is at least academic dishonesty, kind of a plagiaris
26.
by ozgung 8d ago
Tristan and Levent are not a business. This also supports my point that protecting your data is not as trivial as clicking a checkbox.
27.
by ozgung 8d ago
> did Tristan opt out That “opt-out” thing is a dark pattern. It’s not a reliable and definitive way of protecting your data. Sometimes they flip on automatically when you accept a seemingly unrelated dialog box. Maybe you click it by mi
28.
by ozgung 8d ago
No matter what happened this must be a wake up call for all of us. We’re basically sharing everything we have with these companies/AI systems. This is wildly different than a human wiretapping our private messages. Because it is system
29.
by ozgung 8d ago
> The entire training data thing is speculation. I think it's safe to assume AI labs DO train on your data and it's very hard to prevent that. I've just checked my inaptly named "Help improve our AI models" toggl
30.
by ozgung 8d ago
This Godfather-like threat in particular pissed me off as well: > I said that if OpenAI released its result in the way proposed I would go public with what happened. The reply was, “Why would you ruin your career?” I replied that I am an

More ›