8note

11 ms·

1.
by 8note 3d ago
"i did it anyways" is a common continuation of "i know its wrong" i bet they trained it on a lot of text where people gove in to temptation. ultimately the problem is still that they sent it to hack stuff. quelle surpris
2.
by 8note 4d ago
id consider that a craftsman tends to build without constraints. an enginner meets the constraints with a defined safety factor. an engineer uses tools that represent the current state of the science, while a craftsman uses tools passed dow
3.
by 8note 4d ago
the ntsb model has been quite effective at creating safety through analysis of failures in the extremely transparent and public eye. i dont see a reason to think private regulation will do anything but give people explosive diarrhea or drop
4.
by 8note 4d ago
> move to a different country. which other country? who's got this "dump all your money on speculation" like the US does? whis got the slack electric capacity? the ability to buy US GPUs and build datacenters? who is their
5.
by 8note 4d ago
free market doctrine is an axiom to your second order effects. its so embedded into all your assumptions that you havent even considered it
6.
by 8note 4d ago
you can do software engineering without the money just fine. make an open source project without ai
7.
by 8note 4d ago
alignment isnt particularly required we are passing in training data that says to do those felonies. we dont have to. we could also have the thing predict whether what its about to do is illegal or not before doing it. theyre choosing to
8.
by 8note 4d ago
> mfer so is your brain. not it isnt. My brain is a series of organisms responding to various environmental signals that affect each other. you might be tempted to try to represent it with matrix multiplications, but you have no particul
9.
by 8note 4d ago
so uhh, you only read the first sentence? the idea proposed is that hes uniquely incapable of being honest here because he has such an extreme incentive to lie
10.
by 8note 4d ago
the obvious play is to get the government to shut down all the competition, and then make a gajillion dollars while making whatever at the worst level of effort that destroys the world anyways. ---- the real play is using the accumulated po
11.
by 8note 4d ago
i dont think thats particularly worthy of credit? somebody actually invested and trustworthy wouldnt be skirting people's rights to make a killer robot. we havent written it down, but from how everyone reacts, you need permission to tr
12.
by 8note 4d ago
i dont think he said it in those words, but the acceptable terms of use is that humans stay in the loop for picking targets. so, claude suggesting killing a bunch of children, and then hegsdeth approving the strikes is perfectly acceptable.
13.
by 8note 4d ago
theres no benefit to china to giving the US keys over anything though everyone's getting away from the US because americans are unreliable stewards of anything. what gets china onboard when they already have their own regulations and
14.
by 8note 4d ago
nukes arent actually hard to make, its just takes a lot of pretty visible tech a long time to do, so its quote obvious whats happening. the bigger difference IMO is that frontier models are economically useful, where nukes are basically dum
15.
by 8note 4d ago
google dropped "dont be evil" despite being the definition of the company these are just words at a time and place. sama showed that you can futz with it, and as long as you spend enough in court on judges, aint nobody gonna stop
16.
by 8note 4d ago
you are imagining magic as a reason to dump all your money and future money into a casino. You might instead consider joining the catholic church? they already have a free energy god that gives everything you could ever want the cost of ene
17.
by 8note 4d ago
> What if Waymo thought the guns were real, called the cops, and the cops screwed up and shot one of the kids? Waymo is not the one to solve your policing problem. The root issue is that your police shoot to kill first, and investigate
18.
by 8note 5d ago
skills have a pretty straightforward token win - you remove the decision making from the agent so it does specific things in a row. at some point youre better off inverting control to a script that only occasionally calls the agent for a sm
19.
by 8note 7d ago
have you not seen what happened to tiktok?
20.
by 8note 7d ago
ok, but what about for equivalent spenders? one cash, one credit? the credit payer is clearly paying less, with the difference paid by increased prices overall. That is the cash purchaser paying the credit one
21.
by 8note 7d ago
i dont think it is. well, the product itself yes, but it would be the iphone, not the iphone air
22.
by 8note 7d ago
abuse over a monopoly is the reason. probably you already knew that though? if they made it a useful computer, they couldnt charge 30% of revenue to their app store customers
23.
by 8note 7d ago
the motorola razr is actually quite similar in the old and new variation though?
24.
by 8note 7d ago
theyre actually quite nice, and the added redudancy that you still have a perfectly working phone when one of the screens breaks is great. the phone-ness is exactly the same, but i dont think anyone actually needs a full tablet, but an unfo
25.
by 8note 7d ago
i assume most of it is a joke? > It is more precise. Fahrenheit has more frequent degrees, allowing for greater resolution with analog thermometers. this is really about the graduation and size of the thermometer? you can print a useful
26.
by 8note 7d ago
theyre both grounded in reality because the represent real temperature conditions. theyre both just arbitrary degrees though, since 0 isnt actually 0. they both have better alternatives too - Kelvin and Rankin. your criticism about freezing
27.
by 8note 7d ago
in celsius: 50 hurts to the touch, your chip has likely broken and given off its black smoke 30 is good for swimming in cold water >25 is worth worrying about sun stroke. make sure to drink a lot of water 24-26 is a nice summer day 18-22
28.
by 8note 7d ago
reasonably you should already know what the code and project is supposed to do before they even start writing code, so you can get directional feedback in. then you are maybe reviewing 1 out of 7 PRs that implement the agreed upon change
29.
by 8note 8d ago
it does change the scale of solution from "solved some navier stokes" to "put the cherry on top" having a result means the math can keep moving forward, and having openai and anthropic train against how mathematicians us
30.
by 8note 8d ago
the ROI of new closed form solutions to navier stokes is the amount of compute used on CFD for relevant situations, along with all kinds of maintenance and design cost for making things with fluids. the value to the researcher might not be

More ›