20 ms·

Is Apple Losing Its Shine After Steve Jobs?

40 points by garbowza 14y ago

myprasanna 14y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridges_Law_of_Headlines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridges_Law_of_Headlines
- jerf 14y ago
  http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/hardware/Will-Apple-keep-its-shine/articleshow/10261509.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/hardware/Will-A...
- _sh 14y ago
  Before this ignorant meme gets too much of a footing here, why don't you Betteridge your flapjacks off with this one: Why is Apple losing its shine after Steve Jobs?
- lazugod 14y ago
  The law would be better worded as "Headlines that ask extraordinary questions have boring answers."
jonhendry 14y ago
Two words: iPod Socks.
- taligent 14y ago
  Actually this and that giant iPod Speaker was probably two of the most subtle yet genius decisions Apple ever made. They demonstrated to accessory manufacturers that there was a lucrative market for them to get participate in. Not to mention putting "facts on the ground" about expected sales, profit margins etc for them to build their product strategy around.
  - jonhendry 14y ago
    I'm pretty sure there were already accessories on the market at that point. I don't think the iPod Hi-Fi was the first high-end iPod-oriented speaker system.
greenranger 14y ago
Whatever. Apple makes 35 billion instead of the expected 37 billion in a non-holiday quarter - sooo disappointing! They must really be losing their way. All things of course come to an end, but does 35 billion worth of revenue in a quarter signal Cupertino's imminent demise? I mean come on, how many consumer companies can say they've sold 35 billion dollars worth of anything? IMHO, Apple's downfall will come from growing and expanding too much, not too little.
Zenst 14y ago
Ask this question in two years time once the projects Jobs was apart of have run there course. But personaly I see no shine lost, sure they lost a great man but there again he had more than enough time to leave his legacy inplace and that is exactly what he did. If jobs was still about I'd expect the share price to be exactly the same and with that the public have already answeared this question that need not be asked.
nirvana 14y ago
People have been saying that Apple was going down, in my experience, since 1981 with the introduction of the IBM PC. Seriously, in the 1980s it was IBM, Commodore, Tandy, et al. In the 1990s it was Windows. In the past decade every two-bit media player was called an iPod killer. Every phone ripping off the iPhone is called an iPhone killer. Every tablet is called an iPad killer. And of course the myth has been spread that anything Apple does well is just the result of Steve Jobs. Just as everyone who buys Apple products does so because they come under Steve Jobs "reality distortion field". And how everything Apple has been doing in the past 5 years was poor because Steve Jobs health was bad. How about that the iPod sucked becuase it didn't have an FM tuner? Or the iPhone is never going to fly without a physical keyboard. Or the iPad sounds like a woman's product and nobody will buy it, and of course nobody will carry it around. Etc. Etc. Etc. Apple is failing, always has been, and always will be. Every time the stock goes down $30 (equivalent to a $60 stock going down $3) the stock is crashing. When Apple misses wall street expectations by a few cents (but beats their projections) its a sign that the stock is in decline - before Steve Jobs died it was just proof that Apple sucked. When he was sick, it was because he lost control. Now that he's dead, Apple will never be able to accomplish anything good. It has been 30 years of this crap.
- powerslave12r 14y ago
  Your argument would be more useful if you listed what people are currently cribbing about and then debunked it.
  - signalsignal 14y ago
    Why don't you enumerate the complaints do he can refute each? It will be like HN teamwork. :)
- esolyt 14y ago
  Either you're not serious or you need to calm down.
- KevinEldon 14y ago
  Steve Jobs suggests that Apple didn't innovate while he wasn't there (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/09/19/steve-jobs-apple-almost-went-bankrupt-because-it-failed-to-innovate/ http://www.macrumors.com/2011/09/19/steve-jobs-apple-almost-...). The question is then does Apple, without Jobs, have the visionaries and the management team supporting those visionaries to pioneer very specific markets to continue earning billions in the future. I'd guess that over the next few years a Google Glass-style device is ready for the market and some sort of car-friendly voice-controlled heads-up-display computing device is capable of commanding billions, but outside of that it's going to be about apps and information... and although Apple has a huge presence today and lots of cash they've got a very hard positition to hold as Google, Microsoft, Amazon, etc. are fighting for the same consumers who are paying a premium for Apple products. My dad got a 1st gen iPad and really liked it. He just got a Nexus 7 and ditched his iPad. He doesn't think it's amazing or anything, but he can fit it in his pocket, buy books from Amazon directly, it was only $200 and it's lighter and easier to read on. At some point Apple's differentiation shifts from being innovative devices to being "sexy" design and a great interface... sure that sells, but it doesn't sell at nearly the same level as truly innovative devices like the iPod, iPhone, or iPad can. Apple's doing well today, but maintaining this level of success if going to be extremely difficult.
LaSombra 14y ago
Apple adding HDMI and reverting the Apple TV UI, to me, are already signs of that. What's next? Blu-ray?
- r00fus 14y ago
  The Apple TV has had HDMI for years. If you're talking about the new HDMI interface on the retina screen - I think it's a good move - DisplayPort will take years to appear on TVs and this was a serious feature that didn't compete with Apple's other products (unlike Blu-Ray - the entire Apple ecosystem relies on the fact that people are moving away from spinning media)... HDMI is not unlike the addition of the SD card slot in the MBP a couple years ago... a welcome addition.
  - LaSombra 14y ago
    I agree with you, but Jobs always said he wouldn't add HDMI to Apple's laptops because of license fees and rigidity of the standard, IIRC. Jobs never said anything against SD or EC. Though I agree it is useful, I doubt HDMI would make it under Jobs.
hjkl 14y ago
Can Apple do anything other than lose its shine? Is it possible for it to get shinier? I mean, it already has the world's highest market cap and is revered in a way the subsequent next highest market cap companies aren't (Exxon, MS, Wal-mart). It's like a basketball player who makes 100 free throws in a row, misses a couple, and people wonder what the hell happened to him/her.
- WillyF 14y ago
  Or more like a basketball player who swishes 100 free throws in a row, makes the next one but catches a little rim...
jasonkolb 14y ago
They haven't had a product that people lust after in a long time. In fact, with other tablets now viable competitors, I'd say their laptops are their most lust-inducing product out there. I just don't know how they can regain that level of desirability without disrupting another vertical. Or if they make some truly radical hardware innovations, such that it is visible and will make it obvious that you are using an Apple product and not a Samsung. The touchscreen iPhone with gestures and a full browser was a device like that, but that gap has long since been closed by other manufacturers. Siri was, I think, an attempt to do that again, but it wasn't quite ready--something that almost makes me think that Jobs knew he had to pull something out of his hat immediately, even at the cost of shelving his famous perfectionism.
- jmduke 14y ago
  The iPad was released less than three years ago. What's your definition of 'a long time'?
  - dfc 14y ago
    Why do you assume that the problem is the definition of "long time" and not the definition of "lust after." It seems that you think everyone is lusting after the iPad? I know I am not lusting after the iPad, but I'm not a mac lover. The iPad has certainly not matched the lust inducing levels of the iphone or ipod or osx.
    - jmduke 14y ago
      The iPad held 73% of the tablet market last year, most of which came from market entrants who entered solely for the iPad. I don't know what by metric you're judging 'lust' (hopefully it's not just your desire), but its hard to imagine a more impressive performance.
      - dfc 14y ago
        Stats without footnotes are as useful as my anecdotal evidence. Moreover how big is that market?
brisance 14y ago
Apple is propping up the NASDAQ and S&P500. Apple's iPhone revenue alone generates more than all of Microsoft's various business units combined. I'd say that's a pretty good way of losing its shine.
- herval 14y ago
  Remember when people used that exact same phrase refering to Nokia? I do...
wickedchicken 14y ago
"After all, during his too-brief, once-in-a-century career, he radically disrupted at least seven industries: personal computing, desktop software, music, mobile phones, publishing, tablet computers, and Hollywood animation" Completely OT, but I thought it was interesting to note that the time difference between the first mobile phone and the first commercially successful smartphone (1973-2007) and the time difference between the invention of the telegraph and telephone (1832-1876) were approximately the same. Apparently awesomeness takes 40 years to bloom.
- Steko 14y ago
  Maybe it's just the 20 year patents?
- jmduke 14y ago
  I love my iPhone, but calling it the first commercially successful smartphone is willfully ignorant of the Blackberry.
  - ricardobeat 14y ago
    The time gap stands (1973-2002/2003).
    - jmduke 14y ago
      Quite true!
- herval 14y ago
  Are you sure e iPhone was the first "commercially successful smartphone"? It's definitely a top-seller, but I remember quite a few commercially successful devices before it... (mostly Treos and Nokias)
kevinh 14y ago
Apple has done some things that I don't think are wise since the death of Steve Jobs - the "new iPad" branding, the new Apple ads, the potential new form factors developer have to design for. However, they also made some decisions that I thought were stupid when Steve Jobs was there, such as releasing the iPad (which I thought would fail for sure). I'm just waiting to see how everything shakes out before I pass judgment. I've been dead wrong about Apple before, and I don't really see any reason I'll be correct with my opinions now.
- shadesandcolour 14y ago
  What is wrong with their branding. Sure the genius ads didn't go off that well, but I didn't find the message to be that bad. And as for the "new iPad", I'd love to hear your thoughts.
  - kevinh 14y ago
    I, and many of my coworkers, found the ad series - especially the "Basically" ad painful to watch because it was so embarrassing to watch. Apple generally tries to make their products seem "cool", but this ad did just the opposite. Add that to the fact that no one that I'm aware of makes something that is "basically a Mac" and you get a really odd ad. The new iPad branding would be fine - if they weren't planning to make any new models of the iPad. It would forever remain the "new iPad". However, assuming they do release a new iPad, anyone who still uses the new iPad terminology will have to refer to the new iPad as the old new iPad, or, do what pretty much everyone else has done, and refer to it as the iPad 3. I noticed something similar to this the other day when I was comparing the 1998 VW Beetle (which was released under the name the Volkswagen New Beetle) with the 2012 VW Beetle (released under the name Volkswagen Beetle). In order to get which car I was talking about across I had to refer to the 1998 beetle as the old new beetle and the 2012 beetle as the new new beetle, which was awkward and felt counter-intuitive to everyone involved. However, like I said, we'll see how this all shakes out. I've certainly been wrong about Apple's future success before, and I'm sure I'll be wrong about it again.
    - 14y ago
philip1209 14y ago
I decided not to read the article when I saw that Time was accusing the 22nd largest company in the world [1] of being in decline. Time lost its shine with the decline of print media. http://www.forbes.com/global2000/#p_3_s_a0_All%20industries_All%20countries_All%20states_ http://www.forbes.com/global2000/#p_3_s_a0_All%20industries_...
- DigitalSea 14y ago
  Along with every single other print publication, not just Time. Misguided statement there, buddy.
  - MordinSolus 14y ago
    How does that make his statement misguided? Even if I accept your premise that every single other print publication has declined as well, that doesn't make his statement any less true. The statement was only about Time. And I certainly don't accept your premise.
watmough 14y ago
I haven't bought any non-Apple computers or phones in ages, but I just succumbed to the lure of the Nexus 7. It's fantastic, and a great all-around device. It surfs the web, does Gmail, and hooks up to bluetooth, with a great battery life. As far as I'm concerned, that's near enough iPad functionality for half the cost.
- mhenr18 14y ago
  I absolutely despise Gmail and am so happy to have left for iCloud email. My personal life shouldn't be shouldered by advertisements for the highest bidder. It's the same reason I hardly touch Facebook anymore - I don't give a damn about what you're trying to sell, I'm trying to communicate with the people I care about. (edit: it's also the reason why I prefer the Facebook mobile app over the web interface when I do need to use it, because it's not tainted by entities I don't care about) The tablet looks okay but there's no appealing reason for me to want it when it won't do anything that I want of it - I can't Cmd-S in Pages and then lie in front of the TV while making edits on a document. I can't have all of my music with me at all times and I can't pull up my Photo Stream after a day out with friends. For me to even consider an Android device, there would need to be some way for it to integrate into an iCloud lifestyle and I really don't see that ever happening.
brunoqc 14y ago
Maybe. We should also consider that maybe the smart phone trend thing is starting to slow down. Since most of the possibles innovations are already done it's harder to think of new features except maybe more power.
- ricardobeat 14y ago
  Not nearly. There is so much to be explored, even with current technologies like NFC, Bluetooth LE, OLED, pico-projectors, sensors, mesh networking, that current phones will look ancient in 5 years.
jpxxx 14y ago
So tedious. Apple is extremely well positioned in front of almost every mass trend happening in consumer electronics. They are sitting on a tenth of a trillion dollars in cash. They have content deals with more companies in more places than almost anyone else on Earth. They are ending investment in unfruitful markets. They have a rapidly converging consumer platform that has essentially no identifiable competitive weaknesses. Investor confidence is thunderingly high. They're headquartered in an extremely pro-business nation and feted as the last great American wonder business with all that implies politically. They have a global retail arm that defies everything known about retail. Their manufacturing pipeline shames former industry leaders. Their litigation is top-notch. Their customer goodwill is limitless and serves to smooth over many failures in execution and experience. They are, even if all goes dark tomorrow, one of the greatest successes in our industry that we will see in our lives. So as someone put above: if Apple can survive iPod Socks and the G4 Cube, they can probably survive whatever some stringer for Time is reading in the tea leaves. Does anyone have any actual concerns about actual Apple as it pertains to the actual real world? I'll start: - Their push for a tax holiday is going to go over extremely poorly in an election year - Their extremely slow iPhone hardware update cycle leaves them vulnerable to fast-evolving competitors and a single bad product will poison the well for years - The colossal amount of value stored nowadays in a single Apple ID means the damage from a security breach or intrusion is astronomical - Apple has nothing interesting or heartening to say about their law enforcement policies vis a vis the data they collect - Stitched leatherette Contacts
- dfc 14y ago
  Stitched leatherette Contacts?
  - ricardobeat 14y ago
    That's the most worrisome of the list.
  - jpxxx 14y ago
    An evolving trend in OS X and iOS is to rework various applications into little faux leatherette items - Contacts and Calendars have both received this treatment. Reaction is almost universally negative, even among tech uninvolved customers. It appears unprofessional and unbusinesslike to them and tarnishes the image of Apple software as being elegant and industry-best. Apple's made small retreats lately but the idiom is still riding high.

40 points by garbowza 14y ago

myprasanna 14y ago

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridges_Law_of_Headlines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridges_Law_of_Headlines

jerf 14y ago
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/hardware/Will-Apple-keep-its-shine/articleshow/10261509.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/hardware/Will-A...
_sh 14y ago
Before this ignorant meme gets too much of a footing here, why don't you Betteridge your flapjacks off with this one: Why is Apple losing its shine after Steve Jobs?
lazugod 14y ago
The law would be better worded as "Headlines that ask extraordinary questions have boring answers."

jonhendry 14y ago

Two words: iPod Socks.

taligent 14y ago
Actually this and that giant iPod Speaker was probably two of the most subtle yet genius decisions Apple ever made. They demonstrated to accessory manufacturers that there was a lucrative market for them to get participate in. Not to mention putting "facts on the ground" about expected sales, profit margins etc for them to build their product strategy around.
- jonhendry 14y ago
  I'm pretty sure there were already accessories on the market at that point. I don't think the iPod Hi-Fi was the first high-end iPod-oriented speaker system.

greenranger 14y ago

Whatever. Apple makes 35 billion instead of the expected 37 billion in a non-holiday quarter - sooo disappointing! They must really be losing their way. All things of course come to an end, but does 35 billion worth of revenue in a quarter signal Cupertino's imminent demise? I mean come on, how many consumer companies can say they've sold 35 billion dollars worth of anything? IMHO, Apple's downfall will come from growing and expanding too much, not too little.

Zenst 14y ago

Ask this question in two years time once the projects Jobs was apart of have run there course. But personaly I see no shine lost, sure they lost a great man but there again he had more than enough time to leave his legacy inplace and that is exactly what he did. If jobs was still about I'd expect the share price to be exactly the same and with that the public have already answeared this question that need not be asked.

nirvana 14y ago

People have been saying that Apple was going down, in my experience, since 1981 with the introduction of the IBM PC. Seriously, in the 1980s it was IBM, Commodore, Tandy, et al. In the 1990s it was Windows. In the past decade every two-bit media player was called an iPod killer. Every phone ripping off the iPhone is called an iPhone killer. Every tablet is called an iPad killer. And of course the myth has been spread that anything Apple does well is just the result of Steve Jobs. Just as everyone who buys Apple products does so because they come under Steve Jobs "reality distortion field". And how everything Apple has been doing in the past 5 years was poor because Steve Jobs health was bad. How about that the iPod sucked becuase it didn't have an FM tuner? Or the iPhone is never going to fly without a physical keyboard. Or the iPad sounds like a woman's product and nobody will buy it, and of course nobody will carry it around. Etc. Etc. Etc. Apple is failing, always has been, and always will be. Every time the stock goes down $30 (equivalent to a $60 stock going down $3) the stock is crashing. When Apple misses wall street expectations by a few cents (but beats their projections) its a sign that the stock is in decline - before Steve Jobs died it was just proof that Apple sucked. When he was sick, it was because he lost control. Now that he's dead, Apple will never be able to accomplish anything good. It has been 30 years of this crap.

powerslave12r 14y ago
Your argument would be more useful if you listed what people are currently cribbing about and then debunked it.
- signalsignal 14y ago
  Why don't you enumerate the complaints do he can refute each? It will be like HN teamwork. :)
esolyt 14y ago
Either you're not serious or you need to calm down.
KevinEldon 14y ago
Steve Jobs suggests that Apple didn't innovate while he wasn't there (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/09/19/steve-jobs-apple-almost-went-bankrupt-because-it-failed-to-innovate/ http://www.macrumors.com/2011/09/19/steve-jobs-apple-almost-...). The question is then does Apple, without Jobs, have the visionaries and the management team supporting those visionaries to pioneer very specific markets to continue earning billions in the future. I'd guess that over the next few years a Google Glass-style device is ready for the market and some sort of car-friendly voice-controlled heads-up-display computing device is capable of commanding billions, but outside of that it's going to be about apps and information... and although Apple has a huge presence today and lots of cash they've got a very hard positition to hold as Google, Microsoft, Amazon, etc. are fighting for the same consumers who are paying a premium for Apple products. My dad got a 1st gen iPad and really liked it. He just got a Nexus 7 and ditched his iPad. He doesn't think it's amazing or anything, but he can fit it in his pocket, buy books from Amazon directly, it was only $200 and it's lighter and easier to read on. At some point Apple's differentiation shifts from being innovative devices to being "sexy" design and a great interface... sure that sells, but it doesn't sell at nearly the same level as truly innovative devices like the iPod, iPhone, or iPad can. Apple's doing well today, but maintaining this level of success if going to be extremely difficult.

LaSombra 14y ago

Apple adding HDMI and reverting the Apple TV UI, to me, are already signs of that. What's next? Blu-ray?

r00fus 14y ago
The Apple TV has had HDMI for years. If you're talking about the new HDMI interface on the retina screen - I think it's a good move - DisplayPort will take years to appear on TVs and this was a serious feature that didn't compete with Apple's other products (unlike Blu-Ray - the entire Apple ecosystem relies on the fact that people are moving away from spinning media)... HDMI is not unlike the addition of the SD card slot in the MBP a couple years ago... a welcome addition.
- LaSombra 14y ago
  I agree with you, but Jobs always said he wouldn't add HDMI to Apple's laptops because of license fees and rigidity of the standard, IIRC. Jobs never said anything against SD or EC. Though I agree it is useful, I doubt HDMI would make it under Jobs.

hjkl 14y ago

Can Apple do anything other than lose its shine? Is it possible for it to get shinier? I mean, it already has the world's highest market cap and is revered in a way the subsequent next highest market cap companies aren't (Exxon, MS, Wal-mart). It's like a basketball player who makes 100 free throws in a row, misses a couple, and people wonder what the hell happened to him/her.

WillyF 14y ago
Or more like a basketball player who swishes 100 free throws in a row, makes the next one but catches a little rim...

jasonkolb 14y ago

They haven't had a product that people lust after in a long time. In fact, with other tablets now viable competitors, I'd say their laptops are their most lust-inducing product out there. I just don't know how they can regain that level of desirability without disrupting another vertical. Or if they make some truly radical hardware innovations, such that it is visible and will make it obvious that you are using an Apple product and not a Samsung. The touchscreen iPhone with gestures and a full browser was a device like that, but that gap has long since been closed by other manufacturers. Siri was, I think, an attempt to do that again, but it wasn't quite ready--something that almost makes me think that Jobs knew he had to pull something out of his hat immediately, even at the cost of shelving his famous perfectionism.

jmduke 14y ago
The iPad was released less than three years ago. What's your definition of 'a long time'?
- dfc 14y ago
  Why do you assume that the problem is the definition of "long time" and not the definition of "lust after." It seems that you think everyone is lusting after the iPad? I know I am not lusting after the iPad, but I'm not a mac lover. The iPad has certainly not matched the lust inducing levels of the iphone or ipod or osx.
  - jmduke 14y ago
    The iPad held 73% of the tablet market last year, most of which came from market entrants who entered solely for the iPad. I don't know what by metric you're judging 'lust' (hopefully it's not just your desire), but its hard to imagine a more impressive performance.
    - dfc 14y ago
      Stats without footnotes are as useful as my anecdotal evidence. Moreover how big is that market?

brisance 14y ago

Apple is propping up the NASDAQ and S&P500. Apple's iPhone revenue alone generates more than all of Microsoft's various business units combined. I'd say that's a pretty good way of losing its shine.

herval 14y ago
Remember when people used that exact same phrase refering to Nokia? I do...

wickedchicken 14y ago

"After all, during his too-brief, once-in-a-century career, he radically disrupted at least seven industries: personal computing, desktop software, music, mobile phones, publishing, tablet computers, and Hollywood animation" Completely OT, but I thought it was interesting to note that the time difference between the first mobile phone and the first commercially successful smartphone (1973-2007) and the time difference between the invention of the telegraph and telephone (1832-1876) were approximately the same. Apparently awesomeness takes 40 years to bloom.

Steko 14y ago
Maybe it's just the 20 year patents?
jmduke 14y ago
I love my iPhone, but calling it the first commercially successful smartphone is willfully ignorant of the Blackberry.
- ricardobeat 14y ago
  The time gap stands (1973-2002/2003).
  - jmduke 14y ago
    Quite true!
herval 14y ago
Are you sure e iPhone was the first "commercially successful smartphone"? It's definitely a top-seller, but I remember quite a few commercially successful devices before it... (mostly Treos and Nokias)

kevinh 14y ago

Apple has done some things that I don't think are wise since the death of Steve Jobs - the "new iPad" branding, the new Apple ads, the potential new form factors developer have to design for. However, they also made some decisions that I thought were stupid when Steve Jobs was there, such as releasing the iPad (which I thought would fail for sure). I'm just waiting to see how everything shakes out before I pass judgment. I've been dead wrong about Apple before, and I don't really see any reason I'll be correct with my opinions now.

shadesandcolour 14y ago
What is wrong with their branding. Sure the genius ads didn't go off that well, but I didn't find the message to be that bad. And as for the "new iPad", I'd love to hear your thoughts.
- kevinh 14y ago
  I, and many of my coworkers, found the ad series - especially the "Basically" ad painful to watch because it was so embarrassing to watch. Apple generally tries to make their products seem "cool", but this ad did just the opposite. Add that to the fact that no one that I'm aware of makes something that is "basically a Mac" and you get a really odd ad. The new iPad branding would be fine - if they weren't planning to make any new models of the iPad. It would forever remain the "new iPad". However, assuming they do release a new iPad, anyone who still uses the new iPad terminology will have to refer to the new iPad as the old new iPad, or, do what pretty much everyone else has done, and refer to it as the iPad 3. I noticed something similar to this the other day when I was comparing the 1998 VW Beetle (which was released under the name the Volkswagen New Beetle) with the 2012 VW Beetle (released under the name Volkswagen Beetle). In order to get which car I was talking about across I had to refer to the 1998 beetle as the old new beetle and the 2012 beetle as the new new beetle, which was awkward and felt counter-intuitive to everyone involved. However, like I said, we'll see how this all shakes out. I've certainly been wrong about Apple's future success before, and I'm sure I'll be wrong about it again.
  - 14y ago

philip1209 14y ago

I decided not to read the article when I saw that Time was accusing the 22nd largest company in the world [1] of being in decline. Time lost its shine with the decline of print media. http://www.forbes.com/global2000/#p_3_s_a0_All%20industries_All%20countries_All%20states_ http://www.forbes.com/global2000/#p_3_s_a0_All%20industries_...

DigitalSea 14y ago
Along with every single other print publication, not just Time. Misguided statement there, buddy.
- MordinSolus 14y ago
  How does that make his statement misguided? Even if I accept your premise that every single other print publication has declined as well, that doesn't make his statement any less true. The statement was only about Time. And I certainly don't accept your premise.

watmough 14y ago

I haven't bought any non-Apple computers or phones in ages, but I just succumbed to the lure of the Nexus 7. It's fantastic, and a great all-around device. It surfs the web, does Gmail, and hooks up to bluetooth, with a great battery life. As far as I'm concerned, that's near enough iPad functionality for half the cost.

mhenr18 14y ago
I absolutely despise Gmail and am so happy to have left for iCloud email. My personal life shouldn't be shouldered by advertisements for the highest bidder. It's the same reason I hardly touch Facebook anymore - I don't give a damn about what you're trying to sell, I'm trying to communicate with the people I care about. (edit: it's also the reason why I prefer the Facebook mobile app over the web interface when I do need to use it, because it's not tainted by entities I don't care about) The tablet looks okay but there's no appealing reason for me to want it when it won't do anything that I want of it - I can't Cmd-S in Pages and then lie in front of the TV while making edits on a document. I can't have all of my music with me at all times and I can't pull up my Photo Stream after a day out with friends. For me to even consider an Android device, there would need to be some way for it to integrate into an iCloud lifestyle and I really don't see that ever happening.

brunoqc 14y ago

Maybe. We should also consider that maybe the smart phone trend thing is starting to slow down. Since most of the possibles innovations are already done it's harder to think of new features except maybe more power.

ricardobeat 14y ago
Not nearly. There is so much to be explored, even with current technologies like NFC, Bluetooth LE, OLED, pico-projectors, sensors, mesh networking, that current phones will look ancient in 5 years.

jpxxx 14y ago

So tedious. Apple is extremely well positioned in front of almost every mass trend happening in consumer electronics. They are sitting on a tenth of a trillion dollars in cash. They have content deals with more companies in more places than almost anyone else on Earth. They are ending investment in unfruitful markets. They have a rapidly converging consumer platform that has essentially no identifiable competitive weaknesses. Investor confidence is thunderingly high. They're headquartered in an extremely pro-business nation and feted as the last great American wonder business with all that implies politically. They have a global retail arm that defies everything known about retail. Their manufacturing pipeline shames former industry leaders. Their litigation is top-notch. Their customer goodwill is limitless and serves to smooth over many failures in execution and experience. They are, even if all goes dark tomorrow, one of the greatest successes in our industry that we will see in our lives. So as someone put above: if Apple can survive iPod Socks and the G4 Cube, they can probably survive whatever some stringer for Time is reading in the tea leaves. Does anyone have any actual concerns about actual Apple as it pertains to the actual real world? I'll start: - Their push for a tax holiday is going to go over extremely poorly in an election year - Their extremely slow iPhone hardware update cycle leaves them vulnerable to fast-evolving competitors and a single bad product will poison the well for years - The colossal amount of value stored nowadays in a single Apple ID means the damage from a security breach or intrusion is astronomical - Apple has nothing interesting or heartening to say about their law enforcement policies vis a vis the data they collect - Stitched leatherette Contacts

dfc 14y ago
Stitched leatherette Contacts?
- ricardobeat 14y ago
  That's the most worrisome of the list.
- jpxxx 14y ago
  An evolving trend in OS X and iOS is to rework various applications into little faux leatherette items - Contacts and Calendars have both received this treatment. Reaction is almost universally negative, even among tech uninvolved customers. It appears unprofessional and unbusinesslike to them and tarnishes the image of Apple software as being elegant and industry-best. Apple's made small retreats lately but the idiom is still riding high.