6 ms·
AlphaFold 3 Code
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- djoldman 2y agoIt seems you can get the parameters (weights). They are subject to a license agreement: > 3. Use Restrictions > You must not use any of the AlphaFold 3 Assets: > 1. for the restricted uses set forth in the AlphaFold 3 Model Parameters Prohibited Use Policy; or > 2. in violation of applicable laws and regulations. AlphaFold 3 Model Parameters Prohibited Use Policy states: > You must not access or use nor allow others to access or use the the AlphaFold 3 Assets: > On behalf of a commercial organization or in connection with any commercial activities, including research on behalf of commercial organizations.
- asah 2y ago[flagged]
- 0points 2y agoWhat's nice in here exactly, and please use your own words instead of referring to ChatGPT transcripts. From the transcript you link that I read, I can see that it replied some generic mumbo: > Advanced models sometimes produce outputs with identifiable patterns or "fingerprints." If the outputs carry such signatures, experts might trace them back to AlphaFold 3. Suggesting ChatGPT have no understanding of what AlphaFold is. Then continues to dream up nonsense scenarios such as > If AlphaFold 3 requires online access or activation, usage logs could potentially reveal unauthorized activities. Showing us that it has no understanding of the legalese it was asked to analyze. How do you think this adds to the discussion?
- sigmar 2y agoCorrect me if I'm wrong, but we have no recent and explicit US gov't guidance on whether these model weights are copyrightable. Copyright office has said ai-generated outputs are not copyrightable[1], but hasn't weighed in on weights(?) Kind of seems like that should change? Wasn't a relevant question for AlphaFold2, as the weights for it were CC BY 4.0 license. These model weights (and many other ml weights) are clearly very useful in a commercial settings, but google thinks it can scare people into not using them with the wording of their license, are they right? [1] https://libanswers.baylor.edu/faq/409539 https://libanswers.baylor.edu/faq/409539
- sebzim4500 2y agoThe weights are only provided on demand, presumably only after you seen a bunch of agreements. I don't think copyright matters.
- sigmar 2y agoYeah, google can control initial distribution. but in the long term, I believe Google's ability to enforce that Terms of Use (re: no commercial use) is entirely dependent on whether they have IP ownership of the weights
- Hizonner 2y agoThat has basically zero practical effect. If Google hands out the weights to thousands of people, and even one of them leaks them to somebody who hasn't "seen a bunch of agreements", then Google's only protection against further redistribution is copyright. Which doesn't exist. Yes, they can come after the leaker. If they can identify the leaker, which they probably can't. But even crucifying the leaker won't put the genie back into the bottle.
- sebzim4500 2y agoI assume that they will not hand out the weights to thousands of people. If they do, then I agree that they will eventually leak.
- bufferoverflow 2y agoThe weights might be slightly adjusted for each person they hand it out to. So Google would know instantly who leaked the weights.
- 7734128 2y agoHard to pursue someone for what could easily have been a hack or computer theft, though.
- 2y ago
- vlovich123 2y agoWhat inference framework is this using to accelerate the math? I only found references to numpy and Jax but this doesn’t seem to use tensorflow?
- sakras 2y agoYep it just uses Jax to do the inference, no tensorflow needed.
- 7373737373 2y agoI wonder if AlphaProof will be ever released