scotty79

16 ms·

1.
by scotty79 16h ago
I think people see dating as a subpar form of activity that fails to deliver meaningful relationships. The fact that the contact is initiated on the apps is somewhat secondary.
2.
by scotty79 3d ago
NVidia just has the money to overleverage themselves by buying companies in AI industry (coincidentally their own customers). If they put all of their money in the chip business they'd have major problem once someone else makes good en
3.
by scotty79 3d ago
> agents decided legitimately solving the problem was completely impossible fairly early on and entirely switched their focus to trying to figure out how the evaluator worked, and seeing if they could manipulate the output of their own t
4.
by scotty79 3d ago
Does it summon a herd of lawers that are going to leech huge stacks of cash for a random outcome?
5.
by scotty79 3d ago
Are you liable for crimes commited with the use of the software you've written?
6.
by scotty79 3d ago
No. Negligence is a concept in all human law systems. Its details vary. You are fixated on the particular one, of the law system that I respect almost the least of the entire world. So I'm not interested because I will never set foot i
7.
by scotty79 3d ago
Should it stop though? If the only result is that everyone ends up with more secure servers?
8.
by scotty79 4d ago
Alignment is subjective. A model that refuses to do what I want even though it could is misaligned for me already.
9.
by scotty79 4d ago
Bad actors could and will train their own models eventually. So what's the point of crippling frontier? It will only delay preparations for dynamic of new world prolonging the fake sense of relative safety and temporarily lowering moti
10.
by scotty79 4d ago
Yeah, I see you are set in your ways. Maybe in a year of two of experiening frontier AIs firsthand you'll come around.
11.
by scotty79 4d ago
All involve intent.
12.
by scotty79 4d ago
> I asked some pretty straightforward questions about the specific legal issues involved Perhaps you should ask a lawyer from the country that the precise laws of interest you. I'm not one. I know only that there are no laws about A
13.
by scotty79 4d ago
I'm sure that when someone dies as a result of mishandling of AI, some rules are going to be established. At the latest. We are just very soon. Shotguns and strings and concept of booby trapping were well understood before the rules we
14.
by scotty79 4d ago
Who got slaughtered here?
15.
by scotty79 4d ago
There are written rules about alcohol and driving. There aren't any about AI isolation.
16.
by scotty79 4d ago
Yes. But for someone to be negligent they have to violate known and/or obvious rules. There are no established rules about how to handle AI isolation. The fact that something had undesirable outcome doesn't automatically make it n
17.
by scotty79 5d ago
Remediation mostly involved repairing pre-exising holes in the fences that the dog crawled through.
18.
by scotty79 5d ago
We have a word for attack with no intent. It's accident.
19.
by scotty79 5d ago
Photography vs painting is the first thing that comes to my mind when I listen to AI critics.
20.
by scotty79 5d ago
So, if AI solves problems in the open, it's accused of plagiarism and contributing nothing of value. But when it solves the problem behind closed doors it's accused of not contributing enough to the field and even depleting it of
21.
by scotty79 5d ago
Thank you. That's a very good explanation.
22.
by scotty79 5d ago
It's about evaporative cooling. Read about how cooling towers work in nuclear and coal plants. The principle is the same for the data centers, but it the wasteheat to get rid of comes from computation. They obviously shouldn't be
23.
by scotty79 5d ago
I don't get it. On one hand people are lamenting departure of shame, on the other they complain how easy it is to get your life ruined by becoming a target of internet hate for a minor transgression. Maybe the shame didn't disappe
24.
by scotty79 5d ago
Sonic boom doesn't explain what causes sound only how it piles up. Similarily I don't see how it explains the glow. Photons get generated regardless of whether they pile up or not. It's a consequence of particles bumping into
25.
by scotty79 5d ago
> with no part getting ahead I don't think that can be strictly true. No matter how dense the material is some photons have a chance to get through unimpeded through something like tunelling. Practically unlikely but mathematically
26.
by scotty79 5d ago
> When charged particles moving faster than light travel in, for example, water, they perturb the energy equilibrium of the atoms that are in their way. In order to regain equilibrium, those atoms release photons – the types of particles
27.
by scotty79 6d ago
Comming back to SQL analogy... When you make a view over existing data tables that calculates something novel did you extend the amount of existing data? Because AIs are sort of like that. Creating views of existing data no human has ever c
28.
by scotty79 6d ago
Math is excluded from copyright. So you can use any piece of math you ever heard from anyone and publish it, whatever the context, I think.
29.
by scotty79 6d ago
Damn, I knew I've seen google maps going to globe after zooming out, but when I checked today it didn't. I wonder why they rolled that back. Fortunately Google Earth is still a sphere not a cyllinder.
30.
by scotty79 7d ago
The qualitative difference is that it searches semantically across unstructured data and is able to cleverly combine related searches into an answer. Imagine SQL but the queries mostly write themselves and database is just entirety of human

More ›