9 ms·

Accrescent hype is comically overdone.

• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
• free_bip 2y ago
  I looked in the GitHub issues and there's a closed issue for F-droid inclusion. The author states that F-droid "Doesn't meet their requirements" but doesn't elaborate. I wonder what F-droid is missing that they need so much?
  • ementally 2y ago
    Reason https://www.privacyguides.org/en/android/#f-droid https://www.privacyguides.org/en/android/#f-droid
    • ktosobcy 2y ago
      Author also points to https://privsec.dev/posts/android/f-droid-security-issues/ https://privsec.dev/posts/android/f-droid-security-issues/ I'm not really sold on the argument... Also constant push/hype of GrapheneOS (and the "attitude" of it's devs) is mildly annoying...
      • deleted 2y ago
        [deleted]
  • okso 2y ago
    Link: https://github.com/soupslurpr/Transcribro/issues/9 https://github.com/soupslurpr/Transcribro/issues/9
  • okso 2y ago
    F-Droid only packages open-source software and rebuilds it from source, while installing from Accrescent would move all trust to the developer, even if the license changes to proprietary. I understand that the author trusts itself more than F-Droid, but as a user the opposite seems more relevant.
• mijoharas 2y ago
  I only just saw it from this project. I see the features listed[0] which seems like a reasonable feature set, but nothing unusual afaict. If there has been a lot of hype can you tell me what people find compelling about it? [0] https://accrescent.app/ https://accrescent.app/