free_bip

8 ms·

1.
by free_bip 8d ago
Right, the point is we're trying to avoid reverting back to such practices.
2.
by free_bip 8d ago
Do you have anything to back that up?
3.
by free_bip 13d ago
The company that makes the airplane is not normally the company that installs the interior anyways. The airline that buys the plane typically determines what the interior will look like (stuff like ratio of business to economy, overall # of
4.
by free_bip 15d ago
Now we can have John Apple instead of Tim Apple!
5.
by free_bip 15d ago
This is just blatantly false.
6.
by free_bip 23d ago
I've noticed that the main (socially acceptable) use for AI in entertainment seems to be laughing at how bad it is. When it fucks up something obvious that any human would know not to do. When it does something so insane and out of lef
7.
by free_bip 25d ago
Tragic news: The worst person you know made a great point.
8.
by free_bip 29d ago
Most consumers are not an IT department, unfortunately.
9.
by free_bip 1mo ago
We're trying to replace alarm clocks with AI now? Is nothing sacred?
10.
by free_bip 1mo ago
There really needs to be criminal penalties for this kind of behavior. You can't just let autonomous agents hack people through your own negligence and then claim "oh sorry wasn't me" as a defense.
11.
by free_bip 1mo ago
If what you want is the "Why", you're right it probably won't get it right. It'll just give you baseless speculation. But if what you want is the "What" or the "How", I think it can be useful.
12.
by free_bip 2mo ago
By that logic we shouldn't lock up murderers either. After all, it won't help the person who's already dead.
13.
by free_bip 2mo ago
Genuine question here, why would you ask Fable to explain the difference between tusks and teeth? That's a task that can probably be handled by Haiku.
14.
by free_bip 2mo ago
Luckily for you, as far as I can tell you don't have any concrete reason to fear having your repos taken down. Or at least I haven't been given any. If the reason is more emotional than rational ("this feels like it's go
15.
by free_bip 2mo ago
That seems like a completely different concern than what you originally stated? You're not worried about future policies, you're worried about the policy that was just passed. And for what it's worth, it seems like they only
16.
by free_bip 2mo ago
You are effectively saying you do not trust the judgement of the community to accept you long term. Why is that? Is it because you believe there would be a new policy that would exclude your workflow? What would such a policy be? Do you rea
17.
by free_bip 2mo ago
I think this move by Codeberg is lowkey genius. They're trying to build a community based on a set of shared values. Those who disagree with those values are now self-selecting out of the Codeberg community, which is exactly the point
18.
by free_bip 2mo ago
Yes it does. Biometric information (e.g a picture of your face) is famously not nearly as protected under the 4th amendment compared to things like passwords. Anyone opting into this feature is effectively giving any US law enforcement (inc
19.
by free_bip 2mo ago
HuggingFace does not decide who gets charged with crimes. Plenty of people go to prison for crimes the victim didn't want them prosecuted for.
20.
by free_bip 2mo ago
Clearly, a violation of the CFAA has occurred. Now the question is, who should be prosecuted for it? (The answer "nobody" is trivially wrong and should not be considered.)
21.
by free_bip 2mo ago
The reason this was "easy" is because the conjecture turned out to be false. If the collatz conjecture holds true (and most mathematicians seem to think it will), it will be much harder to prove than your average Erdos problem.
22.
by free_bip 2mo ago
Right... So since it's a big problem, shouldn't we at least be considering it as a possibility so that we can minimize the impact?
23.
by free_bip 2mo ago
Agreed. If I'm attending higher education as an adult, I expect to be treated as one. Laptops may be harmful to learning for some students, but may be extremely helpful for others. The university is not the one who gets to decide that
24.
by free_bip 2mo ago
What does NYT's reporting on AI have to do with you? Why exactly is it "playing dirty"? And what about that justifies OpenAI lying to the court (which is a felony crime)?
25.
by free_bip 2mo ago
It's pretty obvious this comment didn't come from a Canadian. Because if it was, you'd know that Palantir is elbow-deep in the Trump administration, the same one that has repeatedly threatened to annex Canada. That is not a t
26.
by free_bip 3mo ago
This Wikipedia article seems completely irrelevant to the quote you posted. They're clearly talking about commercial nuclear energy plants, not orphan sources from radiography and radiotherapy machines.
27.
by free_bip 3mo ago
You're saying this like I would see that 5k in my bank account. If I'm 5% more productive that probably wouldn't even make it into annual review, let alone pay.
28.
by free_bip 3mo ago
If a deal has been reached and the war with Iran is really over as Donald says it is, why is this necessary?
29.
by free_bip 3mo ago
Yes, yes it is impossible. And I'm sure ChatGPT could easily tell you why.
30.
by free_bip 3mo ago
That's weird, I can connect just fine over mullvad.

More ›