25 ms·
The best bit: They recursively reference the paper to provide proof that too many parents choose the same common names: > For instance, a parent might anticipa
by dabiged 2y ago
The best bit: They recursively reference the paper to provide proof that too many parents choose the same common names:
> For instance, a parent might anticipate the name “Kate” would be a pleasantly traditional yet unique name with only moderate popularity. They would be wrong [6].
Reference 6 is the paper.
- martypitt 2y agoAlso good... > Simon Shindler contributed significantly to the aesthetic of Figure 7, but could not be named an author for obvious reasons.
- aleph_minus_one 2y ago> Simon Shindler contributed significantly to the aesthetic of Figure 7, but could not be named an author for obvious reasons. What are these "obvious reasons"?
- jsjohnst 2y agoTheir first name isn’t derived from Katherine. ;)
- byteknight 2y agoKay is derived from Kate. Kate is Derived from Kathy or Katherine.
- jvanderbot 2y agoNicknames satisfy the transitive property.
- bmacho 2y agoNicknames are the objects, isDerivedFrom is the transitive relation on them.
- Mordisquitos 2y agoThe reason was that his first name doesn't satisfy the regex /^[KC]at(h?ie|e|h?y|h?erine)$/
- adolph 2y agoWhile that does work for the people listed as author, it does miss Katherine derivative “Kay.”
- jsjohnst 2y ago/^[KC]a(t(h?ie|e|h?y|h?erine)?|y)?$/
- lostlogin 2y agoIt gets worse - there are some obscure ones. Eg Reina, Kaja, Katarzyna, Aikaterine. https://nameberry.com/list/16/catherinekatherines-international-variations/2 https://nameberry.com/list/16/catherinekatherines-internatio...
- o11c 2y agoSketch of a more complete solution, excluding shortened forms and very foreign ones. Alternatives are in rough order of frequency. vowel 0: E, Ye, Je, Ai. Optional and rare; Ai in particular is very rare. consonant 1: C, K, G, Q. Mandatory; G and Q are rare. vowel 1: a, aa, ai; optional h or gh. Mandatory. A few shortened forms use i instead. consonant 2: t, tt, d. Almost mandatory, but a few r-centric variants lack it. There also seem to be a few vowel 2: a, e. Optional, only valid if consonant 2 exists. In shortened forms, also i, ie, or y; this is the end. consonant 3: r, l. Optional. Sometimes L starts a new word instead. vowel 3: i, y, ee, ie, ii, e if no consonant 2, plus several rare vowel sequences. Almost mandatory (assuming consonant 3), but a few rare variants pack the r right next to the n. consonant 4: n, nn, nh. Optional. vowel 4: e, a, ey. Optional; ey is rare. Some languages shove an s, c, x, t, k somewhere too (some of these are probably language-specific diminutives, but a few might be phoneme drift instead) ... "Kaylee" and its variant "Kayla" should probably not be counted (despite almost fitting the pattern) since that's a compound of "Kay", adding the additional "Leigh" name.
- devsda 2y agoIt goes beyond that. Three of the authors have east-asian last names. I understand that many people from east asia have a given name in their native language and an english sounding name that they often choose themselves. If those three authors did chose their english names, then they too fall into the same category of parents who chose a variation of Katherine.
- schmidtleonard 2y agoI hope they did not perish immediately after choosing their names, as assumed in the paper.
- bee_rider 2y agoIf they did indeed pick those names while traveling to the US, possibly as adults, I think they’d actually really interesting cases. They’d be choosing names later than their peers, so they could see how the name game played out for their peers. Of course, they could also be peers of the parents of the other authors. I’ve also met some folks who had English names that phonetically sounded similar to their original names. I wonder if there’s an east Asian first name that sounds like any of the versions of Katherine.
- burnished 2y agoFrom my anecdotal experience origin is a big factor: of adults I have known to choose a name for themselves americans overwhelmingly pick unusual or ornamented names, whereas the other group (typically asian, first language has a different set of basic sounds) pick stereotypically common and plain/short names. I don't really know anyones specific thought process on the matter though, maybe I'll have to start asking for curiosities sake.
- nucleardog 2y agoAnecdotal, of course, but the goal can be quite different for both groups. English people choosing English baby names often want them to be relatively unique or stand out in some way. At the very least, they don't want them to be _overly_ common. Manny people I've talked to that have chosen a name after immigrating are kind of aiming for the opposite. They want to fit in. They already feel that they stand out, and generally try and minimize that. There's also the fact that for some groups, they're choosing the name at a time when they may not be very familiar with English names or culture, and may not have much in the way of local resources they can or feel comfortable with drawing on, so the main indication they have that they haven't chosen some absurd name is "hey, lots of people here are named that".