burnished

6 ms·

1.
by burnished 11d ago
Duder the tree thing is also pretty cool - but yeah also requiring a certain level of clarity after that just feels like gacha bullshit
2.
by burnished 11d ago
Hey I stopped using it and facebook years ago! Couldnt agree more.
3.
by burnished 14d ago
Eh, no. I'm personally fine with disavowing famous people. We've no obligation to act like we know them or care about them.
4.
by burnished 2mo ago
Definitely a 'sometimes food'.
5.
by burnished 2mo ago
Hell yeah! I mean, sorry about the results, but thanks for trying and sharing your findings
6.
by burnished 3mo ago
This is very well put and much in line with how I think about the matter
7.
by burnished 3mo ago
dang is the moderator
8.
by burnished 3mo ago
Those of us without twitter accounts can't see those links btw!
9.
by burnished 4mo ago
No. Neurons are 'aggregate and fire', and they either fire or they do not.
10.
by burnished 4mo ago
I think the author is comfortable creating headaches for people tacking query strings onto URLs
11.
by burnished 5mo ago
Yeah, big differences between an absolute guarantee and "we'll take as much as we can get"
12.
by burnished 5mo ago
Nice. Really grateful for your participation in this comment tree
13.
by burnished 5mo ago
There isn't really a way around it.
14.
by burnished 5mo ago
I love how you can tell something was generated because it comes out clear and using many of the important writing fundamentals we were all taught.
15.
by burnished 5mo ago
All I know is that when a class starts with 'elementary' or 'fundamentals of' you had best buckle up.
16.
by burnished 5mo ago
Think i'd be ok with a year and a half halt for things in general every now and again.
17.
by burnished 5mo ago
I think this is a good perspective for problem solving generally - just establishing a simple (ideally effective, it not then call it naieve) standard of comparison to base further decisions off of.
18.
by burnished 6mo ago
Simply because it was an information poor exchange.
19.
by burnished 6mo ago
They gave enough detail that its clear from context what 'had to' meant.
20.
by burnished 6mo ago
Motherfucker you try to take my fork while I'm eating and you're going to get a stabbed hand. Are forks addicting?
21.
by burnished 6mo ago
You may be a bit emotionally invested in this topic if you feel you're getting a lot of information from that exchange.
22.
by burnished 6mo ago
It is absolutely one of the better benefits of this forum
23.
by burnished 6mo ago
Title is misleading, there is an open discussion on the topic with someone raising valid points and a clear escalation method that involves a vote from another group.
24.
by burnished 7mo ago
Yeah you can, though to be fair its referred to as jevons paradox because it is counterintuitive.
25.
by burnished 7mo ago
What about it is whitewashing? This seems like it would be a great resource if you wanted to contextualize the argument you're gesturing at.
26.
by burnished 8mo ago
They might have forgotten how to share an anecdote and their sister might just be a regular awful driver
27.
by burnished 8mo ago
I think you missed the bit where they suggested being curious and offering perspective - it really does work out differently
28.
by burnished 9mo ago
I've seen pathological users like the sibling is commenting about. I don't want to out any community in particular but some of subreddits surrounding open source games can get pretty yikes. Not saying you're wrong to find sil
29.
by burnished 10mo ago
Ah, the classic hacker spirit of commercializing every interaction?
30.
by burnished 10mo ago
Probably pattern recognition

More ›