byteknight

5 ms·

1.
by byteknight 11mo ago
Never thought about it from that perspective, but I think you're right. It is by design, not deceptive intent, just the infinite monkeys theorem where we've replaced randomness with pattern matching trained on massive datasets.
2.
by byteknight 11mo ago
May be helpful for others. Fully packaged version https://github.com/IAmStoxe/wirehole
3.
by byteknight 11mo ago
Seems similar to the problem encountered when making the stupid idea PyNQ: https://github.com/IAmStoxe/PyNQ
4.
by byteknight 1y ago
Isn't that specific to pictures?
5.
by byteknight 1y ago
Encryption is defined as "the process of converting information or data into a code, especially to prevent unauthorized access." What you describe is the same thing just not cryptographic.
6.
by byteknight 1y ago
Are you doing roleplay?
7.
by byteknight 1y ago
Seems so easy! You only need the entire world even tangentially related to video to rely solely on your project for a task and you too can have all the developers you need to work on performance!
8.
by byteknight 1y ago
"Just ask AI" is a phrase you will hear around enterprises now. You less often hear "Google it". You hear "ChatGPT it".
9.
by byteknight 1y ago
Not sure how that fits. Do you produce good results every time, first try? Didn't think so.
10.
by byteknight 1y ago
I think you replied in the wrong place, bud. All the best. EDIT - I see now. sorry. For all intents and purposes of the public. AI == LLM. End of story. Doesn't matter what developers say.
11.
by byteknight 1y ago
As an American, I obviously can get behind it, but I can easily see how a declared goal of superiority of others would rub those others the wrong way (and possibly prevent their contribution) [Insert xkcd new standard image here]
12.
by byteknight 1y ago
I have to disagree. Anyone that says LLMs do not qualify as AI are the same people who will continue to move the goal posts for AGI. "Well it doesn't do this!". No one here is trying to replicate a human brain or condition in
13.
by byteknight 1y ago
While it is totally nonsensical, as as suggestion as a business practice, I will indulge in the idea as if you are being genuine. You cannot give a gender more money to do the same job with the criteria being a specific gender. That is blat
14.
by byteknight 1y ago
But in reality, would much more consistently be automated by a single playwright script.
15.
by byteknight 1y ago
He rewrote history to hide it? He admits it here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44516104
16.
by byteknight 1y ago
Gives a whole new meaning to its always DNS.
17.
by byteknight 1y ago
Regardless no one can make you buy anything
18.
by byteknight 1y ago
No, zero click requires no interaction from the user. For a hypothetical example simply having a phone on a cellular network and being susceptible to base-band attacks. No interaction needed, just existing.
19.
by byteknight 1y ago
It bypasses a lot of the checks they do on the initial site when submitting to ad networks. It also allows custom redirections based on user agent, potential ip location, etc. Common in phishing.
20.
by byteknight 1y ago
TTS is a very common initialism for Text-to-Speech going back to at least the 90s.
21.
by byteknight 1y ago
I have to agree with you. Anything that requires an initiation (a chat in this case) by the user is inherently not "zero-click".
22.
by byteknight 1y ago
Amen.
23.
by byteknight 1y ago
An optimist I see.
24.
by byteknight 1y ago
On what planet is JS better than TS. You ever work with JS?
25.
by byteknight 1y ago
Get off my lawn is alive and well it seems
26.
Recent Files Tracker for Obsidian(gist.github.com)
1 points by byteknight 1y ago|1 comments
27.
by byteknight 1y ago
How on earth does buying Wiz force other developers to move? I think the tinfoil is too tight.
28.
by byteknight 2y ago
It didn't stop. What are you referring to?
29.
by byteknight 2y ago
I mean the near-impossible odds weren't enough to dissuade them, I doubt some more statistics will do it.
30.
by byteknight 2y ago
I appreciate the attempt but the reasoning of "it requires maintenance" is entirely moot. You have to do this regardless. Its just whether or not you publish it open-source. You are still saying, internally, this is good enough fo

More ›