5 ms·

Nothing about this supports a Russian attribution.

• grandalf 10y ago
  We're supposed to trust them that it was not just Russian geographically but the Russian government and also the highest levels of the Russian government.
  • 15155 10y ago
    WMDs were in Iraq, too, didn't you hear?
    • threeseed 10y ago
      You can keep making this point but you know it's a stupid one. There was widespread dissent amongst the intelligence communities about the presence of WMD. In this case there isn't such dissent.
• sixothree 10y ago
  What I don't understand is why you created yet another root level comment to point this out again.
• mejari 10y ago
  That was not the goal of the report. It also doesn't support Vanilla being better than Chocolate.
  • cloakandswagger 10y ago
    Then why was it released the exact same day that Obama expelled Russian diplomats as punishment? You can argue that the report technically wasn't meant as evidence of Russian intervention, but the administration certainly doesn't mind people thinking that it is.
• dgudkov 10y ago
  What would you expect as a proof?
  • Natsu 10y ago
    Look at the NSA's TAO tools for the kind of thing I expect from a nation state. They're using backdoored hardware & TEMPEST, not pitiful phishing scams.