zxwrt

6 ms·

1.
by zxwrt 3y ago
What a nefarious move by Hetzner and Linode. How to trust them after this?
2.
by zxwrt 3y ago
Don't forget to consider adding ipv6 support since you are lacking it.
3.
by zxwrt 3y ago
Agree. Using "free and open" is still rather deceptive.
4.
by zxwrt 3y ago
Yes. > ... An open source cloud that can run anywhere. > ... Open-source or managed for you. Available on GitHub under the Elastic v2 license. Taken from here: https://ubicloud.com/
5.
by zxwrt 3y ago
Looks like another fauxpen source, yes.
6.
by zxwrt 3y ago
Thanks! Do not make this mistake again!
7.
by zxwrt 3y ago
itsfoss publication that is not directly linked in article: https://news.itsfoss.com/skiff-mail-review/ Still not deleted.
8.
Skiff.com is lying about being open source(raikas.dev)
6 points by zxwrt 3y ago|1 comments
9.
by zxwrt 3y ago
Not that excellent. They still don't have ipv6 support in 2023
10.
by zxwrt 4y ago
Actually, the only compiler interface that can claim to call itself a standard is POSIX c99. Everything else is too volatile to be a standard.
11.
by zxwrt 4y ago
These are non-standard GNU extensions, unfortunately.
12.
by zxwrt 4y ago
Sad that C23 didn't get symbol visibility attributes. They are very useful for libraries. Perhaps there is still a chance to get them?
13.
by zxwrt 4y ago
No worries
14.
by zxwrt 4y ago
I meant the website, yeah
15.
by zxwrt 4y ago
When will openbsd.org get ipv6 support?
16.
by zxwrt 4y ago
You can't hack the paper, but you can hack the machine, no matter how secure it is...
17.
by zxwrt 4y ago
> It's on their list fortunately. Do you know why they fail to implement ipv6 for years? I mean it's shame when tech-oriented website/service can't keep up with new technologies. > Until then you can derive and use
18.
by zxwrt 4y ago
Looking forward to ipv6!
19.
by zxwrt 4y ago
> To me the only downside of Meson is that it requires python but I can accommodate with that. Check out https://git.sr.ht/~lattis/muon
20.
by zxwrt 4y ago
I agree that disabling will-be-posix extensions in POSIX mode sounds like an extreme idea, but seriously, such strictness is the main point of the pdpmake. It ensures that implementation conform to the current standard, not draft which may
21.
by zxwrt 4y ago
> Is there a good source for finding strict POSIX tools rather than just go digging? Some communities(iglunix, kisslinux, carbs linux, wyvertux, oasis linux, ...) are actively researching alternatives to the "standard" coreutil
22.
by zxwrt 4y ago
awk: nawk aka one true awk sed: sbase sed m4: https://github.com/ibara/m4
23.
by zxwrt 4y ago
But out-of-tree builds feature is optional, right?
24.
by zxwrt 4y ago
The wrong part in GNU make is that it always permit using non-posix extensions regardless of .POSIX special target, while pdpmake does not. This fact makes pdpmake kinda special since it can be used for posix compliance testing, which is cr
25.
.sex Considered Dangerous(datatracker.ietf.org)
2 points by zxwrt 4y ago|0 comments
26.
by zxwrt 4y ago
sr.ht lack ipv6 support to be viable option. I'd suggest considering codeberg or notabug instead.
27.
by zxwrt 4y ago
Please add ipv6 support.
28.
by zxwrt 4y ago
It requires google account, has tracking and isn't open-source. I'd say it is no go
29.
Respectful Software(github.com)
2 points by zxwrt 4y ago|0 comments
30.
by zxwrt 4y ago
link without tracking: https://godocs.io/fmt

More ›