Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zoltz
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
Rethinking the Palm Oil Boycott
(thegreymatter.substack.com)
2 points
by
zoltz
1y ago
|
1 comments
2.
▲
Demonizing Narratives
(conspicuouscognition.com)
5 points
by
zoltz
2y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
The surprising resilience of naive views
(birdperspectives.substack.com)
1 points
by
zoltz
2y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
The talk: a brief explainer of sexual dimorphism
(malmesbury.substack.com)
4 points
by
zoltz
3y ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
zoltz
3y ago
But the profit-aligned corporations are made of people, as you say, and once the leaders are personally affected by the „deterioration of the ecology necessary for human life to persist“, they will seriously try to stop it. That, I guess, i
6.
▲
Understanding the Danger from Strong AI
(birdperspectives.substack.com)
2 points
by
zoltz
3y ago
|
3 comments
7.
▲
A Multi-Level View of LLM Intentionality
(disagreeableme.blogspot.com)
102 points
by
zoltz
3y ago
|
72 comments
8.
▲
In Favor of Caution
(centerlessset.substack.com)
1 points
by
zoltz
3y ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
Many-worlds understanding can increase agency
(birdperspectives.substack.com)
1 points
by
zoltz
3y ago
|
0 comments
10.
▲
A Change: Rethinking institutions after COVID
(thegreymatter.substack.com)
3 points
by
zoltz
3y ago
|
0 comments
11.
▲
As social media took off, the track of reason ran out
(birdperspectives.substack.com)
2 points
by
zoltz
4y ago
|
0 comments
12.
▲
The sack against the pie (on harmful mental models)
(birdperspectives.substack.com)
1 points
by
zoltz
4y ago
|
0 comments
13.
▲
Considerations on Careerscienceability
(birdperspectives.substack.com)
1 points
by
zoltz
4y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
The three modes of current American politics
(birdperspectives.substack.com)
1 points
by
zoltz
4y ago
|
0 comments
15.
▲
Starman
(1843magazine.com)
2 points
by
zoltz
9y ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
How to ensure Clean Olympics
(sites.google.com)
1 points
by
zoltz
10y ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
Computational Complexity and the Nature of Reality
(edge.org)
2 points
by
zoltz
10y ago
|
0 comments
18.
▲
What Really Happened to Michael Rockefeller
(smithsonianmag.com)
11 points
by
zoltz
11y ago
|
1 comments
19.
▲
The Universe Is Made of Mathematics
(disagreeableme.blogspot.com)
34 points
by
zoltz
11y ago
|
59 comments
20.
▲
It Is Easy to Predict the Future
(edge.org)
2 points
by
zoltz
11y ago
|
0 comments
21.
▲
Will Thinking Machines Evolve to Be as Wonderful as Dogs?
(edge.org)
1 points
by
zoltz
12y ago
|
0 comments
22.
▲
by
zoltz
12y ago
Indeed, title needs to be changed to "Geospatial Resolution of Human and Bacterial Diversity with City-Scale Metagenomics". https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8282204
23.
▲
by
zoltz
12y ago
"After the loss Kasparov questioned whether Deep Blue's team had cheated in order to beat him, but in a fascinating new short documentary by FiveThirtyEight and ESPN, it's shown that the momentous victory — and the notorious
24.
▲
by
zoltz
12y ago
From the guidelines: "If you want to add initial commentary on the link, write a blog post about it and submit that instead". This would seem to explicitly allow telling others how to perceive a story, so I don't really see h
25.
▲
by
zoltz
12y ago
Thank you for the explanation! In my 2nd paragraph I had older stories in mind where it's most likely a case of "either I submit it or nobody does". I can see now how my proposal is bad in the "normal" case of hot,
26.
▲
by
zoltz
12y ago
Thanks! Just looked into this further. The guidelines say you should use the original title when submitting a story. But what if this title is uninformative and the subtitle is too long? Then you have to summarise. I don't think it
27.
▲
Submission titles still subject to change by editors?
2 points
by
zoltz
12y ago
|
7 comments
28.
▲
by
zoltz
18y ago
Not sophisticated, and only a first step to get some kind of traction, but using it can make a real difference to me: a) Define your main project b) Choose an activity that you like and that comes naturally as procrastination c) Choose a re
29.
▲
by
zoltz
18y ago
Neither of these arguments even attempts to refute the central point of the essay. In case anyone wants to try it, the central point is that in an organization organized as a tree structure, structural forces tend to give each person freed
30.
▲
by
zoltz
18y ago
Refuting the proof of a central point rather than the central point itself must be considered DH6 in Paul Graham's hierarchy. Roth probably took that for granted. I certainly would. Otherwise I hereby claim P = NP and preemptively accuse an
More ›