Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zmatt
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
zmatt
1y ago
Uhh, I'm not seeing any system requirements, am I blind? It just warns against using the /list command if you have a very slow internet connection since it produces rather voluminous output. If you scroll down a bit further they a
2.
▲
by
zmatt
2y ago
Crowdstrike has published some technical details: https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/falcon-update-for-windows-h...
3.
▲
by
zmatt
2y ago
No, CS has explicitly stated that the cause was a logic error in the rules file. They have also stated "This is not related to null bytes contained within Channel File 291 or any other Channel File."
4.
▲
by
zmatt
4y ago
That link seems to show a very different story though? What they said was that they _hadn't_ requested a takedown for those reasons "Simply put, the actual process of requesting the take down and proving violation would have sever
5.
▲
by
zmatt
5y ago
I'm sure if you're a reputable hosting provider able to sponsor a server then libera will be interested, even if there's no official procedure documented yet for offering hosting.
6.
▲
by
zmatt
5y ago
Apparently the bridge is up since yesterday.
7.
▲
by
zmatt
5y ago
Libera is effectively the spiritual continuation of freenode, managed by the former freenode operators. Freenode on the other hand is now under control of new management, which has in very short time already managed to prove itself inept an
8.
▲
by
zmatt
5y ago
While it perhaps seems a bit heavy-handed, it's an easy way to ensure people notice the channel has moved, even if they haven't been following the news, and thus minimize damage to your community. I don't see how this action
9.
▲
by
zmatt
5y ago
https://hackaday.com/2021/05/20/freenode-debacle-prompts-sta...
10.
▲
by
zmatt
5y ago
This article also has some interesting background info on Lee and his motivations: https://hackaday.com/2021/05/20/freenode-debacle-prompts-sta...
11.
▲
by
zmatt
9y ago
Reduce number of syscalls by using sendmmsg()/recvmmsg() to batch together multiple packets per syscall?