zija

4 ms·

1.
by zija 2y ago
Small F# community have https://fsprojects.github.io/FSharp.Formatting/ that is a lot better than docfx, it has markdown support, notebook suport, script output embedding. C# has nothing like that, xml comments and raw
2.
by zija 2y ago
I don't understand why the dotnet team doesn't invest more resources and time into tools: doctests and documentation generation, better and faster unit tests that I can write next to the actual code, easy access to the source code
3.
by zija 3y ago
They are working on servo implementation, but it's long time to go. Tauri has problem on Linux, webkit2gtk has lower performance etc. I know I have problems with three.js, others with svg Additionaly communication speed between backend
4.
by zija 4y ago
C# team began experimenting with green threads: https://twitter.com/davidfowl/status/1532880744732758018?t=P...
5.
by zija 5y ago
I don't know what to think about it. Half-baked idea: use free functions only in one file in project is meh.. Modern Kotlin, Scala, F# can and use free functions and reduce boilerplates to minimum. C# developers wants attract newbies,
6.
by zija 5y ago
No, i like Rust very much. But Rust require from me to deep dive with language, it's not productive language, it's correct from start to end language. Language with optional GC, value types like Nim or D are better for small hobby
7.
by zija 5y ago
From top popular language, say from https://redmonk.com/sogrady/2021/08/05/language-rankings-6-2... , only Go and Swift/ Objective-C are languages with static typing, compiled to native tool chain .
8.
by zija 5y ago
Few gripes with c# (as a hobby developer): -no sum types, Java 17, kotlin, scala, f#, typescript, rust, Swift, nim, ocaml etc all can modeling types better than C# - no option, no result, exceptions are invisible for caller (ex. Tracking e