zigzag312

18 ms·

1.
by zigzag312 1mo ago
Because it's not under GDPR, but under ePrivacy. See section 3.6: https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinio...
2.
by zigzag312 1mo ago
The guidelines you linked state: "These Guidelines do not address the circumstances under which a processing operation may fall within the exemptions from the consent requirement provided for by the ePD". Let's check what &qu
3.
by zigzag312 1mo ago
The policy is both, good, but also flawed. For example, you cannot persist settings, because one policy says that website settings should be ephemeral unless user agrees to persist them.
4.
by zigzag312 1mo ago
Scrolling is like an Achilles' heel of Flutter. There's still no smooth scrolling with mouse for web.
5.
by zigzag312 3mo ago
Even if the purchasing entity is backed by a foreign country?
6.
by zigzag312 3mo ago
But many of the listed hypotheticals are not dependent (on top) on others, and since there are multiple that actually increases probability of an undesirable outcome.
7.
by zigzag312 3mo ago
Yes these can be used as alternatives sometimes, but they are not really the same thing. We need a streamlined way for reusable libraries (written in different languages) to be consumed by different languages while not being limited to a sp
8.
by zigzag312 3mo ago
Exactly! It's surprising to me how little development is happening in this area.
9.
by zigzag312 3mo ago
What about a better ABI abstraction?
10.
by zigzag312 3mo ago
Can you share source of this data? I have my doubts about the quality of the data, since OAuth2 is such a complex system with so many footguns. In the end there is always some long lived secret. What changes is just where and how it is stor
11.
by zigzag312 3mo ago
I agree with what you said. I just wanted to add that intelligent models probably need to have some notion embedded (but not everything), as some information retrieval is not trivial. Too few embedded notions will hurt it's ability to
12.
by zigzag312 3mo ago
Understanding of a specific problem space can be a prerequisite to be able to form a proper query (i.e. to ask the correct question). Model doesn't know what it doesn't know.
13.
by zigzag312 3mo ago
Ah, now I see what you meant.
14.
by zigzag312 3mo ago
Of course you can have reactive state, your complaint however was: "The react in react stands for reactivity, however it is not." [because] "Its entire state management is not reactive" React is primarily an UI library,
15.
by zigzag312 3mo ago
UI is reactive, not state. You push changes to state and UI reacts to it.
16.
by zigzag312 4mo ago
> It roughly compares with GPT-4.1 (!!), released 14 months ago I think the mayor win for coding was reasoning. That's why such a small model can match GPT-4.1 in coding, but I suspect that GPT-4.1 still wins in general world knowle
17.
by zigzag312 4mo ago
It's not arguing that predictive power is bad. Just that people often mistakenly believe some phenomenon is understood more deeply than it really is, because a model can fit data and generate accurate predictions.
18.
by zigzag312 4mo ago
> The out-of-the-box Shotwell manages photos quite well without any intelligence. This piqued my interest on how it does it and after briefly checking the project it seems it only has two features for automatic photo categorization. 1) i
19.
by zigzag312 5mo ago
One interesting thing about Barman is that it just uses PG's own backup utilities. It doesn't implement custom parsers and things like that. So, there's less maintenance work needed for Barman when PostgreSQL changes data-fil
20.
by zigzag312 5mo ago
pg_probackup seems to be another one.
21.
by zigzag312 5mo ago
This project looks nice, albeit a bit young for a backup tool. Did you encounter any issues or limitations?
22.
by zigzag312 5mo ago
Is that info up-to-date? Their readme states: **Backup types** - **Logical** — Native dump of the database in its engine-specific binary format. Compressed and streamed directly to storage with no intermediate files - **Physical*
23.
by zigzag312 5mo ago
Handling of exceptions is not enforced at compile time, while ownership is. Better example might be statically typed languages. They were harder to use at first, but now with good type inference and features like generics, they are much mor
24.
by zigzag312 5mo ago
Reference counting is a form of garbage collection.
25.
by zigzag312 5mo ago
Type unions only at first, but there's more being planned.
26.
by zigzag312 5mo ago
You can use dependencies that aren't using nullable reference types in projects that use it. You can enable/disable nullable reference types per file, as it only influences static analysis. There's no runtime difference betwe
27.
by zigzag312 5mo ago
.NET JIT supports dynamic PGO.
28.
by zigzag312 5mo ago
That's due to trimming which can be also be enabled for self-contained builds that use JIT compilation. Trimming is mandatory for AOT though. But you can use annotations to prevent trimming of specific thing. AOT doesn't support g
29.
by zigzag312 5mo ago
Which part of the ecosystem is blocking your projects from using nullable references? I find them very helpful, but the projects were all newer or migrated to new SDK.
30.
by zigzag312 5mo ago
From what I've read, this is for the first implementation of unions, to reduce amount of compiler work they need to do. They have designed them in a way they can implement enhancements like this in the future. Things like non-boxing un

More ›