zeeg

8 ms·

1.
by zeeg 6mo ago
Did you consider looking to see what they actually already do? There's a reason this works.
2.
by zeeg 6mo ago
It’s not useful if it’s never read by agents - that’s the premise of the statement.
3.
Show HN: Warden – agent based framework for reviewing code(warden.sentry.dev)
2 points by zeeg 8mo ago|0 comments
4.
by zeeg 9mo ago
I'm not talking about RedHat, I'm talking about the perspective that "FSL / BUSL aren't effective enough". They solve the problem. O'saasy is just freeware at the end of the day, FSL creates more open sour
5.
by zeeg 9mo ago
The issue is these are mostly academic points of view. Sentry’s model on the FSL (and previously the BUSL) has shown to be working just fine at scale. Whereas, for example, trademark protections have shown to fail easily. So people can argu
6.
by zeeg 10mo ago
Clearly this is bait but we have done nothing but be supportive of small accounts. It’s still $29, we still are extremely generous on forgiveness and sponsorships, and we still prioritize the long tail. 70% of our business is smb/mm, a
7.
by zeeg 1y ago
Just want to say, absolutely this. Its an awfully confusing way to say: "if you make money, compile your own binaries or pay us". Have a feeling the confusion and FUD it causes will create more harm than good unfortunately.
8.
by zeeg 1y ago
No, its complicated and scales to servicing every customer in the world. Thats not the same thing. Doesnt mean the complaints about self-hosted arent valid, but "literally has to scale to the most insane volumes of data" and &quot
9.
by zeeg 1y ago
If you - or anyone reading this - ever ends up in a situation where we came off as aggressive send me a direct email and I will take care of it. This is not something we believe in at Sentry, and while you cant manage everything, its import
10.
by zeeg 1y ago
fwiw I was always pretty transparent about our priorities: https://blog.sentry.io/building-an-open-source-service/ We enable self-hosting because not everyone can use a cloud service (e.g. government regulation), other
11.
by zeeg 1y ago
Any chance you can link me to the ticket? Feel free to email - david at sentry
12.
by zeeg 2y ago
Define large workload. Sentry runs large workloads and Postgres isn't a bottleneck. We have also never employed a DBA. Most users never need to shard their database, and at most can just partition datasets by tables for _extremely_ hig
13.
Show HN: GameGame – an LLM to resolve conflicts in board games(gamegame.ai)
8 points by zeeg 2y ago|0 comments
14.
by zeeg 2y ago
When you offer a subset of the product as open, and a subset as not open, its not open source. Pretty simple math for me. This is not a comment on "which" OSI license they used for the open part, but I will not support people call
15.
by zeeg 2y ago
This is the problem with the definition. If the product is trurly open source, call it that. If its not, thats ok, but don't. Core has no real definition. I definitely would never call GitLab Open Source. I can't comment as much o
16.
by zeeg 2y ago
Postgres is not operated by the same people as Neon or Amazon, thats a fundamental difference. I was also not suggesting commercial cannot benefit Open Source (and would in fact quite the opposite). In general I was not commenting if they&#
17.
by zeeg 2y ago
I just wanna remind folks that Open Core is not the same as Open Source. I didn't look at specifics, but I was triggered by this comment: > Some people call our strategy "open-core" and that's technically right. Still
18.
by zeeg 2y ago
You have nailed their issues - packaging and their revenue model. If you align this well with your target audience the license would have not been a problem for them. Wrote about this a bit here: https://cra.mr/open-source-i
19.
by zeeg 2y ago
No ones saying Fair Source is better than Open Source, but in your analogy one protects the commercialization of a project, and the other does nothing to protect the creators. The clarity of what is and isnt permitted is something we'l
20.
by zeeg 2y ago
FSL is strict on two years. We certainly would not promote a version that’s variable. You could make one, but it’s our job as a community to say “no!”
21.
by zeeg 2y ago
This isn't how Sentry works though. 1. You have a burst of errors - typically this happens first month when people dont understand their volume, or they had a runaway bug. 2. We rate limit/throttle you for your billing period. We
22.
by zeeg 2y ago
What's the concern here? The pricing is transparent, and yes we've adjusted it over the years to be more in line with our costs. We still charge you per error just like we have since I started the business, and we're very hon
23.
by zeeg 2y ago
I have written quite a lot on my personal blog about our decisions and been very transparent. In particular, the decision on switching to BUSL orgininally I talk about here: https://cra.mr/the-busl-factor Its worth remember
24.
by zeeg 2y ago
> FWIW, if Sentry had stayed GPL or even moved to AGPL, I think they would have stopped much of their newer competition from even coming to market (I'm thinking of signoz, glitchtip, vs OTEL and its million integrations here.) We ne
25.
by zeeg 2y ago
For the interested, might have finished a POC thats unfortunately not totally generic, but achieves what I'm after: https://github.com/dcramer/peated/pull/171 Requires some duct tape for tanstack/qu
26.
by zeeg 2y ago
I want one fundamental thing: the ability to ask library authors to implement span annotations in their projects. Today that ask comes with way too much baggage. The SDKs are often extremely complex ("bloated", other's words,
27.
by zeeg 2y ago
Guess I am unqualified to say that folks who say metrics, logs, and traces are the definition of telemetry is mistaken.
28.
by zeeg 2y ago
Says who? Sentry has many other types of telemetry and we’ve existed long before OTel. Who are these all knowing humans who say this is what telemetry is? Are they also going to build every collector for every kind of past current telemetry
29.
by zeeg 2y ago
Can you give more context on what you mean around sampling. What does an OTLP endpoint have to do with it?
30.
by zeeg 2y ago
imo Honeycomb pioneered this, and its the right baseline. There are limitations to it of course, and certainly its been done before at BigCo's that can afford to build the tech, but its extremely powerful. The main argument for metrics

More ›