zastrowm

7 ms·

1.
by zastrowm 3y ago
The charitable view would be that they come from language/platform that does include the base-class's methods/apis. Your example of dotnet/C# doesn't seem to be the best - DotNet/C# repeats the base documenta
2.
by zastrowm 3y ago
I liked Edge originally too - it seemed cleaner than chrome and had some cool features like vertical tabs and the Dev tools that were better than Chrome's. I made it my daily driver. Then they adding a shopping helper; then more ads to
3.
by zastrowm 3y ago
I find the best middle ground is setting up the IDE to have TSC watch running while making changes, but using other tools for doing the actual compiling (vite for example). This allows me to refactor quickly - choosing when to ignore type e
4.
Amazon CodeCatalyst – Unified Software Development Service(aws.amazon.com)
12 points by zastrowm 4y ago|0 comments
5.
by zastrowm 4y ago
It may not be the correct way or a smart way, but it is objective - the metric being used cannot be interpreted one way or another, it's just LOC.
6.
by zastrowm 4y ago
For this specific example the problem is that the handleClick callback is using a stale/cached onImageDeleted callback (which indirectly has old state). If you add onImageDeleted to the handleClick dependency array, it beings
7.
Everything you need to know about monorepos, and the tools to build them(monorepo.tools)
1 points by zastrowm 5y ago|0 comments
8.
by zastrowm 5y ago
I think the point was that it's not different from Node.js - and thus not much of a benefit. If it was more along the lines of "I want to use this array helper library, but it shouldn't have any permissions" then it wo
9.
by zastrowm 9y ago
Yeah, but I wonder if .NET wouldn't have succeeded until .NET Core without generics as a distinguishing feature. I feel like generics + some of the features built on them (LINQ+TPL+etc.) is what let .NET/C# stand apart from Java.
10.
by zastrowm 9y ago
This surprised me: > It was only through the total dedication of Microsoft Research, Cambridge during 1998-2004, to doing a complete, high quality implementation in both the CLR (including NGEN, debugging, JIT, AppDomains, concurrent loa
11.
The Real History of TechCrunch(uncrunched.com)
356 points by zastrowm 9y ago|89 comments
12.
by zastrowm 9y ago
I crave this for C#/.NET; I was hoping the article was going to mention something about faster edit cycle w.r.t. normal apps. It came pretty close: > ... uses the new Mono IL interpreter to run managed code at runtime... to be used
13.
by zastrowm 9y ago
The CSharpLang github[1] repository would be where to look for this. I didn't find anything that mentioned adding language support for it, and IIRC, in the past they rejected the idea of inline XML or JSON support. Going the other way
14.
by zastrowm 9y ago
I'm curious if this will change now that webapps/electron-apps have become so popular. It may be that users have begun non-native apps as the new norm.
15.
by zastrowm 9y ago
Has there ever been discussion about a permission for "running as an app" that would make a distinction between web pages and apps? I like that the web gets more features that allow apps to run cross-platform, but I don't fu
16.
Language Server Protocol Preview Release for Visual Studio(blogs.msdn.microsoft.com)
3 points by zastrowm 9y ago|0 comments
17.
by zastrowm 9y ago
Yep, it's annoying to have those limitations, but I sort of understand why. They could make their message a lot clearer though. > I personally would have the hardest time with the 250 user limit From the document, the text is &quo
18.
by zastrowm 9y ago
> even the drug-pusher-like "Community" (first hit is free, unless/until you're making money) edition. I mean, yeah it's not free-for-all, but "first hit is free" is kind of unfair. A company is not al
19.
by zastrowm 9y ago
I believe that .NET Core is not a subset of the .NET Framework; e.g. .NET Core might have things that are not yet in .NET framework. I believe that the things that go into .NET core eventually go into .NET Standard (and thus the framework),
20.
by zastrowm 9y ago
I wondered the same, so I looked it up: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/171928
21.
by zastrowm 9y ago
My understanding was that vivaldi wasn't completely open source either. [0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/vivaldibrowser/comments/54kzpc/psa_...
22.
by zastrowm 9y ago
Ah, faster than the `ConcurrentDictionary`. That makes sense!
23.
by zastrowm 9y ago
> I am talking about what value you could pass into the multiple dispatch code in the article I linked to Ah, I misunderstood the question. Yes, in that case it's fairly type-safe. > The actual reflection going on in the code I
24.
by zastrowm 9y ago
> I've found the DLR is just as fast... with a much lower overhead Can you expand on this? I would not have expected that it would be faster than compiled expressions.
25.
by zastrowm 9y ago
> A dynamic type is probably just implemented as a tagged bit of data, surely A dynamic "type" is really just `object` whose methods are looked up at run time. It's not tagged data at all. See [1] for more info, specifica
26.
by zastrowm 9y ago
> FYI, I recently found out that C# can actually do multiple dispatch But also good to know, that it can be costly and unsafe. `dynamic` is basically using reflection at run-time, which for most cases is fine, but it's something to
27.
by zastrowm 9y ago
Reading this reminded me of all the discussions that took/are taking place for pattern matching in C#[0]; reading this I had the same reactions that I did for C#: cool stuff. It's also nice to see the languages reach parity in fea
28.
by zastrowm 10y ago
From https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/347 (Details > Mutability): > Should tuples be mutable or immutable? The nice thing about them being > structs is that the user can choose. If a re
29.
Improvements to searching for special characters in programming languages(blog.google)
2 points by zastrowm 10y ago|0 comments
30.
Sound Dart and strong mode(news.dartlang.org)
3 points by zastrowm 10y ago|0 comments

More ›