zaaakk

4 ms·

1.
by zaaakk 6y ago
They don’t serve food like any of the taquerias here in Texas, maybe superficially similar... they do serve burritos which are more Cali mex.
2.
by zaaakk 6y ago
Why would the police say otherwise? Nice critical thinking.
3.
by zaaakk 6y ago
Land, Dugin, Moldbug, and Rorty is not French.
4.
by zaaakk 6y ago
Just watch him in the debate with Zizek. He’s clearly out of his league.
5.
by zaaakk 6y ago
Can you name some musicians, artists, architects, philosophers? What are you talking about? This post is hilarious, you’re acting like studying French philosophy is doing fentanyl or something.
6.
by zaaakk 6y ago
Your pseudo-intellectualism is painfully obvious here. French postmodernism (Foucault, Derrida) is very different from critical theory of the Frankfurt school. It’s a token sign of someone who hasn’t read any of them to lump them together.
7.
by zaaakk 6y ago
You’d be interested to hear, then, that most of Marx’s work is about analyzing capitalism and very little of it involves prescriptions for future societies. In fact, Marx wasn’t interested in drafting any exact plan for a post-revolutionary
8.
by zaaakk 7y ago
Sure, except the mortality rate is nowhere near 100% and you will likely acquire the virus or it’s descendants at some point unless you continue washing your cereal boxes forever.
9.
by zaaakk 10y ago
great, another lesswrong/rationalist asshat dumping on a humanities subject with brazen ignorance. blogposts like this should be used as toilet paper
10.
by zaaakk 10y ago
you take the red pill, you read Marx, Althusser, and Adorno and your eyes are forever opened. you take the blue pill, you agree with the posts up voted above mine and go back to sleep. your choice, kid
11.
by zaaakk 10y ago
kudos for doing the work, I forgot about this post
12.
by zaaakk 10y ago
read adorno
13.
by zaaakk 10y ago
OK, I actually do agree with the art history errors he points out–Graham's comment that "The paintings made between 1430 and 1500 are still unsurpassed," for example, is completely ridiculous. And I also totally agree that De
14.
by zaaakk 10y ago
This article is trash. His conception of what a painter is is just lifted from mysogynistic pop-culture stereotypes, and his argument essentially rests on his inability to compare the two arts on an abstract level (e.g thinking he's re
15.
by zaaakk 10y ago
Slate Star Codex: if you're a man who is involved in tech and not interested in any legitimate philosophical or sociological inquiry, we've got you covered
16.
by zaaakk 10y ago
Yeah, I'm not saying they aren't art. They are, and like I said before, I'm excited about the medium. I just don't think there's anything with the intellectual depth or creative virtuosity as Pynchon-yet. It's
17.
by zaaakk 10y ago
Awful article. If you've never read a book that could captivate you as much as Doom, then you've probably just never read literature at a serious level. I stopped reading when the author offered clickbait "best games of [year
18.
by zaaakk 10y ago
or he could ask an academically trained philosopher of mathematics and probably receive a much more insightful response