z7

6 ms·

1.
by z7 13d ago
François Chollet wrote in February that he expected ARC-3 to be saturated in "about one year". "Frontier models today perform very poorly with a minimal harness. However if big labs start directly targeting the benchmark like
2.
by z7 13d ago
Chollet writes he expects AGI now sooner than 2030, "given progress is happening faster than I expected." https://x.com/fchollet/status/2095607046129463577
3.
by z7 2mo ago
> The cost of generating the proofs for all 10 of these breakthroughs combined was under $2,000 at Sol API prices. https://x.com/polynoamial/status/2083470822258467194
4.
by z7 2mo ago
> The incredible Yitan Zhang ( https://newyorker.com/magazine/2015/02/02/pursuit-beauty ) worked on proving this conjecture for 7 years. Moh, his advisor, wrote that Zhang "failed miserably" i
5.
by z7 2mo ago
"Hey Leibniz, how do you live with yourself knowing that your binary system helped eventually replace human conversations?"
6.
by z7 3mo ago
"I just tested my hand in a mini version of this scanner. Images that are higher quality than MRI, whole body captured in <1 minute, virtually free to run. This is going to change medicine." https://x.com/Sebast
7.
by z7 7mo ago
"As Alexander predicted in 'AI 2027,' OpenAI did release a major new model in 2025; unlike in his forecast, it’s been a damp squib. Advances seem to be plateauing; the conversation in tech circles is now less about superintel
8.
by z7 8mo ago
The comparison isn't really like-for-like. NHTSA SGO AV reports can include very minor, low-speed contact events that would often never show up as police-reported crashes for human drivers, meaning the Tesla crash count may be drawing
9.
by z7 8mo ago
> The West is not complicit in the actions of the Iranian regime What about the 1953 CIA/MI6 coup that overthrew Iran's elected prime minister?
10.
by z7 10mo ago
"You only live once." Why state this as absolute fact? Seems a bit lacking in epistemic humility.
11.
by z7 11mo ago
Here's the Grokipedia submission (currently censored / flagged): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45726459
12.
by z7 11mo ago
Hypothetically, what if the AI-generated blog post were better than what the human author of the blog would have written?
13.
by z7 1y ago
List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_ap...
14.
by z7 1y ago
Current cope collection: - It's not a fair match, these models have more compute and memory than humans - Contestants weren't really elite, they're just college level programmers, not the world's best - This doesn't
15.
by z7 1y ago
An encyclopaedia is a lossy representation of reality.
16.
by z7 1y ago
Meanwhile this new paper claims that GPT-5 surpasses medical professionals in medical reasoning: "On MedXpertQA MM, GPT-5 improves reasoning and understanding scores by +29.62% and +36.18% over GPT-4o, respectively, and surpasses pre-l
17.
by z7 1y ago
Yes, but the jump in performance from o3 is well beyond marginal while also fitting an exponential trend, which undermines the parent's claim on two counts.
18.
by z7 1y ago
>The actual benchmark improvements are marginal at best GPT-5 demonstrates exponential growth in task completion times: https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-com...
19.
by z7 1y ago
GPT-5 is #1 on WebDev Arena with +75 pts over Gemini 2.5 Pro and +100 pts over Claude Opus 4: https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard
20.
by z7 1y ago
Some previous predictions: In 2021 Paul Christiano wrote he would update from 30% to "50% chance of hard takeoff" if we saw an IMO gold by 2025. He thought there was an 8% chance of this happening. Eliezer Yudkowsky said "at
21.
by z7 1y ago
How do you explain Grok 4 achieving new SOTA on ARC-AGI-2, nearly doubling the previous commercial SOTA? https://x.com/arcprize/status/1943168950763950555
22.
by z7 1y ago
"Grok 4 (Thinking) achieves new SOTA on ARC-AGI-2 with 15.9%." "This nearly doubles the previous commercial SOTA and tops the current Kaggle competition SOTA." https://x.com/arcprize/status/1943
23.
by z7 1y ago
Quoting Chollet: >I have repeatedly said that "can LLM reason?" was the wrong question to ask. Instead the right question is, "can they adapt to novelty?". https://x.com/fchollet/status/18663
24.
by z7 1y ago
It's just predicting tokens: https://old.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1jl5qfs/its_ju...
25.
by z7 1y ago
Why are you hallucinating feelings? Also, appeal to authority. ("Why are your feelings relevant to the wizarding laws of Hogwarts?")
26.
by z7 1y ago
>For starters, this completely blocks generation of anything remotely related to copy-protected IPs It did Dragon Ball Z here: https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1jjtcn9/the_new_im... Rick and
27.
by z7 2y ago
The beginning of a new kind of discrimination - call it 'synthetic racism.' AI-generated music is being dismissed outright even before listening to it, not based on quality or enjoyment but purely on its artificial origin. Just as
28.
by z7 2y ago
Waymo's driverless taxis are currently operating in San Francisco, Los Angeles and Phoenix.
29.
Competitive Programming with Large Reasoning Models(arxiv.org)
6 points by z7 2y ago|0 comments
30.
by z7 2y ago
I don't understand it either. Why is Elon Musk a "terrorist"? And why is this the most upvoted post? Maybe being European limits my ability to comprehend American political rhetoric.

More ›