yumong

7 ms·

1.
by yumong 2y ago
I'm aware that that's the theory. But if it's really promising and ready and I care enough then I'll notice anyway.
2.
by yumong 2y ago
I'm still trying to wrap my head around what this tool is achieving. Running filters on many files? Does this mean that your business dies if the original tool gains the ability (and nice GUI) to run batch jobs on its own?
3.
by yumong 2y ago
Never in my life have I signed up on a waitlist. And nobody else I know ever has. I have enough spam in my inbox, why actively invite more?
4.
by yumong 2y ago
And Second Life and Myspace.
5.
by yumong 2y ago
Stephen Wolfram pushes this to the extreme. Surprised that nobody mentioned him yet.
6.
by yumong 2y ago
From an evolutionary perspective, wouldn't we expect to have developed a way to "reset" parts of our brain then?
7.
by yumong 2y ago
Do we have aby indication that that's true? They are trying (and apparently succeeded) to sell something that's quite obviously fake. Whatever else they claim should be viewed in the light of that lie.
8.
by yumong 2y ago
I recommend Lex Friedman's podcast's episode with Matthew Cox.
9.
by yumong 2y ago
From somebody who paid more than that 20 years ago?
10.
by yumong 2y ago
The assumption was that a trusted third party exists. Since you trust it, by definition, you can contact it to confirm authenticity of the certificate.
11.
by yumong 2y ago
They bought it for 3000 DM and then sell it for less than half that price over 20 years later?
12.
by yumong 2y ago
I'd also ask how come a single binder would suffice for 10 years of bills.
13.
by yumong 2y ago
And the locally used abbreviation for the currency at the time was DM, not DEM. For close to $1000, a little bit of effort is not unexpected. (Also, why assume this was a guy?)
14.
by yumong 2y ago
"x% chance dying of the flu" has two vastly different meanings. "If you die, then the cause of death is to 2.5% the flu" is one meaning. Likely close to correct. "With 2.5% you will die this year a death caused by t