yuliyp

5 ms·

1.
by yuliyp 1mo ago
Each of those agents ends up making "decisions" that lead it to look at some things over others. Given infinite the same agent could eventually fully explore all those options, but each one explores things a bit differently due to
2.
by yuliyp 2mo ago
Fine. "The LLM produced a chain of reasoning consistent with a belief that X is happening." I've found it fairly helpful to anthropomorphize systems to communicate things about their behavior, despite them obviously not being
3.
by yuliyp 2mo ago
An LLM is not me. It is capable of doing more "work" but it also doesn't have my mental models and experience. My colleagues know roughly my areas of expertise. If I say "I think that X is happening" they'll as
4.
by yuliyp 2mo ago
But the write should have triggered a page fault immediately in that case, and should have been blocked on the page being actually allocated before resuming.
5.
by yuliyp 2mo ago
So the theory is that the page is faulted in, then somehow evicted within 10 instructions, then re-faulted in somewhere else, resulting in writes not making it to the page? That would need a context switch and another page fault to happen i
6.
by yuliyp 2mo ago
There is not a perfect solution. There are many bad solutions. There are a few solutions that are OK but with different tradeoffs.
7.
by yuliyp 3mo ago
Hey, that's my name too!
8.
by yuliyp 3mo ago
Not sarcastic, but I probably didn't convey the subtlety of what I was trying to say in a one line comment. I was objecting to the defeatist "oh the tech is there, so we can't do anything about it" attitude. I tried to c
9.
by yuliyp 3mo ago
The tech's also been there to put cameras everywhere, and to wiretap every phone, etc. We put guardrails in place to control how that tech is deployed.
10.
by yuliyp 4mo ago
To pull the example of Discord since the ExHashRing was mentioned in the OP: Needing to hash a few hundred things instead of one thing adds up when you do it a lot of times. They went with consistent hash ring over rendezvous hash because o
11.
by yuliyp 4mo ago
The hierarchical (log(n)) approach to bucketing here is fine for an "I just want to shard this N ways, N will never change" but is extremely intolerant of bucket mutations. Part of the point of rendezvous hash and consistent hashi
12.
by yuliyp 4mo ago
> Now, if someone searches for an espresso machine, Gemini will pull up your most relevant products and instantly write a custom explainer highlighting why your product may be the right choice for them. This is like the essence of the ev
13.
by yuliyp 5mo ago
But intelligent beings are fundamentally fallible? That's kind of the nature of doing leaps of reasoning: sometimes those leaps are amazing, sometimes they're wrong. It's what's advertised.
14.
by yuliyp 6mo ago
Glyph binning looks for any chunks in the image that are similar to eachother, regardless of what they are. Letters, eyeballs, pennies, triangles, etc without caring what it is. OCR looks specifically to try and identify characters (i.e.
15.
by yuliyp 6mo ago
what at all does this comment have to do with what it's replying to?
16.
by yuliyp 6mo ago
In companies I've been in, insider trading windows close because there's been a certain amount of time since the last report. So less frequent reports = more time for insider to know things that aren't public yet = more time
17.
by yuliyp 6mo ago
"only 8 cents of every dollar shows up as direct aid and grants" That's an extremely misleading statement. For instance, a food bank giving away food to a pantry does not count as "direct aid and grants" (at least,
18.
by yuliyp 7mo ago
None of what they're pledging is much of a change from how they've already been operating: - They already invest in new power plants and connection infrastructure when they bring in new datacenters - Electricity for datacenters is
19.
by yuliyp 7mo ago
That's because they are slowpokes and maniacs: In a decently flowing road, the majority of distinct cars you see are either moving significantly faster or slower than you (and the more extreme the difference the more likely you are to
20.
by yuliyp 7mo ago
Easily. Going from 700 -> 1000 ft spacing adds 150 feet of walking (x2 for both sides of the trip). That's about 1 minute. Over a mile you'd reduce the number of stops by 2.2. So above 2 miles it's faster even for the lowe
21.
by yuliyp 7mo ago
Of the ones that I know something about, almost each one is a stretch to call a lie, or just downright misleading. - 'Internal document stating the goal for Meta to be the most relevant social products for kids worldwide. To do so, Met
22.
by yuliyp 7mo ago
The change was when the nonprofit went from being the parent of the company building the thing to just being this separate entity that happens to own a lot of stock of the (now for-profit) OpenAI company that builds. So the nonprofit itself
23.
by yuliyp 8mo ago
... if you're logged out. Log in so they don't have to lump you in with every scraper you're sharing a subnet with.
24.
by yuliyp 8mo ago
The end game of that is no useful content being accessible without login, or needing some sort of other proof-of-legitimacy.
25.
by yuliyp 9mo ago
this is an energy storage ("battery") system, not a generation system.
26.
by yuliyp 9mo ago
That's the consequence of 4 freeways all (I-580, I-80, I-880, SH-24) dumping their traffic onto a bridge, and using metering lights to try and keep the bridge itself working.
27.
by yuliyp 9mo ago
Starting at 9:46 is when it goes from wow to WOW. The last 2 minutes in particular are incredible, including the bizarre artifacts in the last 15 seconds before the stream dies.
28.
by yuliyp 10mo ago
I'd presume they have the ability to deploy a previous artifact vs only tip-of-master.
29.
by yuliyp 11mo ago
Having a front door physically allows anyone on the street to come to knock on it. Having a "no soliciting" sign is an instruction clarifying that not everybody is welcome. Having a web site should operate in a similar fashion. Th
30.
by yuliyp 11mo ago
Yes, because most of the things that people talk about (ChatGPT, Google SERP AI summaries, etc.) currently use tools in their answers. We're a couple years past the "it just generates output from sampling given a prompt and traini

More ›