Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
yipbub
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
yipbub
4mo ago
Thanks, I'm an adult and I need it too
2.
▲
by
yipbub
4mo ago
The status dashboard doesn't seem to be showing anything, but it's been down for a few hours for me. https://status.search.google.com/
3.
▲
Ask HN: Who's Still Hand Coding?
2 points
by
yipbub
5mo ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
by
yipbub
6mo ago
You're either being naively or facetiously too literal. She's saying that her point is about him, so talking about him is ad hominem, but not a fallacy because unlike fallacious ad hominem attacks, her argument about the hominem i
5.
▲
by
yipbub
7mo ago
Maybe it can be aspirational.
6.
▲
by
yipbub
7mo ago
I used a paid model to try this. Same deal.
7.
▲
by
yipbub
8mo ago
I think it's taking things too literally and pointedly ignoring the subtext while unintended or not having subtext of their own. feels like sophistry the article connects the two, so they are not orthonogonal either: > But even as t
8.
▲
by
yipbub
9mo ago
I remember when I could blindly type because autocorrect was so good. I've been enjoying FUTO keyboard a bit, but I dont yet know if it's the same experience.
9.
▲
by
yipbub
10mo ago
I don't understand your syntax: `You+App --Read/Write-> f_private(your_data) <--Write only- 3p` Does this mean a server where third parties can send code to run on your data, but cannot respond to them?
10.
▲
by
yipbub
10mo ago
Probably better not to shout in the first place.
11.
▲
by
yipbub
11mo ago
I have mkcd exactly ( I wonder how many of us do, it's so obvious) I have almost the same, but differently named with scratch(day), copy(xc), markdown quote(blockquote), murder, waitfor, tryna, etc. I used to use telegram-send with a c
12.
▲
by
yipbub
1y ago
Don't confuse liberal capitalists, libertarians, etcs with leftists. It's free market liberals and right wing libertarians that espouse this kind of free market stuff. The people most commonly calling nazis nazis(with some rare h
13.
▲
by
yipbub
1y ago
The examples you use are disingenuous and irrelebant. They were judge decisions, not jury ones, one was a minor with mental issues. Over-prosecution of minorities is a documented bias. No, if the biases were flipped, this kind of study woul
14.
▲
by
yipbub
2y ago
I have these that come from history|grep espeak From a particularly sunny day where I was having too much fun waiting for my builds: while ps -49011;do sleep 3;done;espeak "IT'S DONE YOU FUCK. COME WORK.";telegram-send
15.
▲
by
yipbub
2y ago
Not the Thinkpad in the video though
16.
▲
by
yipbub
2y ago
Thank you for sharing your experience. It was valuable to me!
17.
▲
by
yipbub
2y ago
I wonder how many people talking about self-control have a good relationship with their phone? I don't know anyone personally who likes their relationship with their phone. I've been considering and trying to practice being kinder
18.
▲
by
yipbub
2y ago
Right.
19.
▲
by
yipbub
2y ago
Seems like tilling might be counterproductive long-term then: > Tilling and plowing are almost synonymous with land cultivation, aren't they? Yet they actually destroy soil structure, create compaction, and kill the very soil biolo
20.
▲
by
yipbub
2y ago
> Tilling and plowing are almost synonymous with land cultivation, aren't they? Yet they actually destroy soil structure, create compaction, and kill the very soil biology that's the basis of fertility, like fungal networks an
21.
▲
by
yipbub
3y ago
I think it's just phrased unintuitively. "Balance usability against security hoops to jump through" sound better to me. You have to get to the last paragraph of the fifth section of this article before it makes anything resem
22.
▲
by
yipbub
3y ago
> I've reviewed my comments and this is mostly false. Not sure why you felt you needed to put this one in here. Huh, me too. Could've sworn I saw this, and now I don't. My bad...
23.
▲
by
yipbub
3y ago
You replied to many top level comments for a period of time the same period of time with almost the same text. Telling people to disregard this one persons tech content because of software-politics views. Does he not also have the right to
24.
▲
by
yipbub
3y ago
Is this going to be a race? Multiple people implementing it in parallel and one claims the prize?
25.
▲
by
yipbub
3y ago
You seem to be on a crusade of the same level of "hate"(your standards, not mine) too. Against a person in fact.
26.
▲
by
yipbub
3y ago
Ex-Redhatter that watched stuff go down while defending it till I stopped (much after I left). That's not Redhat anymore, it's IBM. The lovely RHEL people and CentOS people didn't have a say. We kept hearing and believing tha
27.
▲
by
yipbub
3y ago
The amazing stuff often has certain level of challenge, excitement, and reward behind it that compensates for the long feedback loops. It's not necessary for sure, but it sure is nice!
28.
▲
by
yipbub
3y ago
Interesting. This is not true for Memory, correct? The OOMKiller might get you. You also cannot achieve a QoS class of Guaranteed without both CPU and Memory limits, so the pod might be evicted at some point.
29.
▲
by
yipbub
3y ago
It seems like the comment above is describing out-out and the it pesters you to opt-back in if you opt-out.
30.
▲
by
yipbub
3y ago
> Too much regulation and safety enhancements don’t reach the fleet, is the thesis. Does the FDA believe this thesis for drugs? Clearly not. Or, more precisely, the benefits do not outweigh the harm. I don’t believe it applies to aircraf
More ›