yeoyeo42

7 ms·

1.
by yeoyeo42 15d ago
AI's are also human made (and in the case of LLMS, trivially and obviously trained to be as human as possible), therefor there's no escape from your nightmare.
2.
by yeoyeo42 29d ago
no offense, but it just sounds like you don't understand local maxima in high dimensional spaces. a suboptimal trait evolving that still provided an overall population benefit (via survival or reproduction) with further improvement clo
3.
by yeoyeo42 1mo ago
misinfo. that has nothing to do with why athletes train the way they do. getting more calories in is not a limiting factor. anaerobic lactic and alactic regime training just has a hard metabolic and fatigue thresholds where you won't s
4.
by yeoyeo42 1mo ago
the toy problem is for demonstration purposes. this is a lived experienced in everyday programming of performance sensitive fields. those apps tend to be vastly more architecturally complex in almost every way compared to your average corpo
5.
by yeoyeo42 1mo ago
quite loaded words there. "knowledge", "relationships". the llm must be able to output the correct code when the input says something like 'place object x to the left of object y' vs when it says 'to the r
6.
by yeoyeo42 2mo ago
yes. in the sense that they probably wouldnt want to do this but the law forces them to do an extremely dumb thing. they're paying for the books, no shady things going on there. whether the publishers should deserve more than a single
7.
by yeoyeo42 2mo ago
technology is just a red herring. GTA-level whacky NPCs will have NPC behaviour regardless of what situation you throw them in. The same "person" that shows absurd behaviour like that, assuming it's not just rage/clickba
8.
by yeoyeo42 3mo ago
this is true, but in practice the EU and its local governments have a giant issue with incompetence when it comes to the specifics of regulation. it's overregulated and sometimes even in such ways that it doesn't even achieve the
9.
by yeoyeo42 3mo ago
Not ragebait, actual question. Isn't this kind of scenario exactly the kind of thing where capitalism is supposed to generate a lot of competition that makes everything higher quality and cheaper for the end consumer? There is giga hyp
10.
by yeoyeo42 5mo ago
I think the steps would be like this: - get understanding of ordinary vector linear algebra. - understand what vector dot product does and why - understand why an orthogonal set of basis vectors for the space you're working in is usefu
11.
by yeoyeo42 10mo ago
5 microseconds is a whole lot of time for just a branch misprediction, which is on the order of a few nanoseconds. probably a lot more important stuff going on and focusing on the wrong thing. for example, predicting a different branch can
12.
by yeoyeo42 10mo ago
the answer is a big depends. but I can give you some ballpark intuition. perhaps it's easiest to think about regular image processing because it uses the same hardware. you can think about each pixel as a particle. a typical 4k (3840 x
13.
by yeoyeo42 1y ago
it's not meaningless, it has several direct implications about the nature of reality. consider that subjective experience - to put it in the weakest and most general statement - clearly has a physical component. I'm being careful
14.
by yeoyeo42 1y ago
no, the first principles could be reduced to the domain that you're working in, which in this case would be non-relativistic physical optics. that is, the description of electromagnetic waves using maxwells equations. these could be co
15.
by yeoyeo42 1y ago
with one eye you have temporal parallax, depth cues (ordering of objects in your vision), lighting cues, relative size of objects (things further away are smaller) together with your learned comparison size etc.