yeahdude

6 ms·

1.
by yeahdude 11y ago
Arguments usually reinforce delusion.
2.
by yeahdude 11y ago
If most men had many wives, there must have been a lot less men than women, and/or a lot of men with no wife at all. Or perhaps wife sharing would account for it.
3.
by yeahdude 11y ago
Are there any other reasons why incest is considered bad?
4.
by yeahdude 11y ago
You're not supposed to refuse to do business with someone on the basis of your religion (or theirs). However, even though it's illegal, but plenty of people get away with it - "We don't like yer kind in here!" Gett
5.
by yeahdude 11y ago
There was a study in Italy of a patient who was cured of a severe form of bipolar called rapid cycling bipolar with "darkness therapy". They locked him in a dark room for 14 hours a night and after a couple months his sleep and h
6.
by yeahdude 11y ago
What's ironic is how condescending and formulaic your writing is, considering your hatred of the 'overclass'.
7.
by yeahdude 11y ago
You said the difference is academic. No, it requires significant changes to the legal framework of marriage. Consider the following programs: 1) A program that allows a PC to talk to a Mac 2) A program that allows a PC to talk to a PC. 3)
8.
by yeahdude 11y ago
Can you name one other kind of marriage that will necessarily get legalized because we legalized same-sex marriage? Can you name one other kind of marriage that is demonstrably more likely to get legalized because we legalized same-sex marr
9.
by yeahdude 11y ago
What is the difference between specifics and fundamentals? Aren't the legal ramifications the fundamentals? I mean, it is a legal institution that we are talking about, right? I'm not saying you can't have a loving and inti
10.
by yeahdude 11y ago
So the child of a divorce has to move between more than 2 homes now? A wealthy man can split his income with more than 1 wife that doesn't work? It's not the same, it's qualitatively and quantitatively different. Is there a
11.
by yeahdude 11y ago
> You're right, it's not a slippery slope. It's a gate we've opened and said that whatever your [thoughts, feelings and behaviors about X are], no one else has a right to tell you that it's wrong. That is a ver
12.
by yeahdude 11y ago
Not when you consider the legal ramifications.
13.
by yeahdude 11y ago
Pointless wankery is offering an opinion like "no clearer for no reason" without justification.
14.
by yeahdude 11y ago
I keep forgetting this one: don't offer help to complainers.
15.
by yeahdude 11y ago
From another perspective, hacking often involves making broken things work better.
16.
by yeahdude 11y ago
grep -v
17.
by yeahdude 11y ago
Is the conflict you read about a bug in the compiler or a bug in the standard? A bug in the standard is much worse, whereas implementation bugs can be fixed. Maybe you read about undefined behavior? Implementations are free to change how
18.
by yeahdude 11y ago
The ANSI C standards are backwards compatible. K&R C is not one of them. If you write in C89/C90 it will last as long as any LISP program.
19.
by yeahdude 11y ago
ESR's claims about politics : ESR's claims about technology :: your claims about logical fallacies : your claims about ESR
20.
by yeahdude 11y ago
> Ad homimen would be "people named Eric cannot be trusted". Since you actually wrote this sentence 9 hours ago, it is safe to infer that you really don't know anything about logical fallacies or what you're talking a