yaemiko

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by yaemiko 1mo ago

   "summary, a, b, c, why it matters" + fillers like the summarization tools based on those models except it's the opposite, it was fluffed up into a long article
2. 2.▲
   by yaemiko 2mo ago

   perhaps wasn't your intent, but this clearly demonstrates the benefit of those kinds of rules for everybody around both on codeberg and here. and you're still here
3. 3.▲
   by yaemiko 7mo ago

   oh they will "try" to fix it, as in at best they'll add "don't make mistakes", as the blogpost suggests. that's about as much effort and good faith as one can expect from people determined to automate ever
4. 4.▲
   by yaemiko 7mo ago

   and the formatting, and "the cool part? the weird part? the catch?", and "engaging" questions at the end of not just this but other posts on that blog unfortunately the writing is getting praised even here so it will con
5. 5.▲
   by yaemiko 8mo ago

   or at least better compatibility with reader view... it would just make sense. i was about to suggest it when it worked with brave's one (xtwitter articles and bluesky threads didn't), but then it didn't work in safari