yacthing

11 ms·

1.
by yacthing 2mo ago
No idea why he's so famed. I've been to a few of his houses and they are completely impractical to live in. So focused on making things look good, but spent no time thinking about people actually living in the houses.
2.
by yacthing 4mo ago
Maybe they saw traffic that looked like AI prodding an API and quickly adapting to find the bug? But at this point I feel like odds are everyone looking for vulnerabilities is using AI to some extent. Why wouldn't they? It'd be st
3.
by yacthing 5mo ago
No one is dying when Pelosi insider trades.
4.
by yacthing 7mo ago
There are inefficiencies with both. In a perfect world, yeah, it'd be more efficient to not have capitalism. You'd just have to get around inefficient labor allocation, increased fraud, etc. At least for capitalism, the amount ext
5.
by yacthing 7mo ago
This is about as useful of an argument as when people say taxpayer funded services aren't free. Those who are wealthier pay more into the tax system, allow those who are less well off to gain access to things they normally wouldn'
6.
by yacthing 7mo ago
If you want to comfortably retire, then one of the following is probably true: 1. you have a solid pension 2. you should care about capital gains taxes 3. you're REALLY rich and don't care.
7.
by yacthing 9mo ago
Easy to say if you either: (1) already have enough money to survive without working, or (2) don't realize how hard of a life it would be to "flip burgers" to make a living in 2026. We live very good lives as software develope
8.
by yacthing 9mo ago
'"AI" is literally models trained to make you think it's intelligent.' What's the difference? I try to make people think I'm intelligent all the time.
9.
by yacthing 11mo ago
Most people optimize for productivity and not raw quality of code. I can't imagine that your productivity is higher for removing autocomplete. I'm not saying you need every plugin ever, but autocomplete? Maybe you haven't tri
10.
by yacthing 1y ago
> So what's your answer? My answer is simply: It's not a 5 minute regex change. I'm not even saying it shouldn't be prioritized or isn't worth the effort. Just that you should give the problem a bit more respect.
11.
by yacthing 1y ago
That's a lot of words, but I think it boils down to: you're making an assumption that two calendar events with identical naming and identical time entries will always have a desired behavior of being deduped. - Maybe you want to s
12.
by yacthing 1y ago
> We're both programmers so we're both know we're talking about a one line regex... As a big tech programmer, it's almost never that simple... Small edges cases not covered by a one line regex can mean big issues at s
13.
by yacthing 1y ago
It's a form of "I told you so". It's insensitive, but probably appropriate given the importance of moving forward gun control efforts.
14.
by yacthing 1y ago
Well people aren't talking about not deploying to staging on Fridays. And there are hints to what the author actually means, like "Each deploy should be owned by the developer who made the code changes." That just isn't
15.
by yacthing 1y ago
This reads like someone who works on a small and simple system. "Deploy on every commit" lmao "Shipping software and running tests should be fast. Super fast. Minutes, tops." hahah