Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
xnickb
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
xnickb
6d ago
Sounds more like profitmaxxxing to me to be honest.
2.
▲
by
xnickb
6d ago
The good old Aqua Regia test.
3.
▲
by
xnickb
9d ago
That statement is true for the users that both bought and didn't buy a Macbook (with Linux support). The difference is, the one who bought has paid money for the Macbook. I am not an Apple user. Do you _have_ to pay for iCloud if you b
4.
▲
by
xnickb
9d ago
It's not like users will just stop using the services. Rather Linux users will start considering MacBook as a potential laptop to buy. How could that possibly disrupt their Software/Services infra?
5.
▲
by
xnickb
10d ago
Wow. I'm a Linux user and I have to use Mac for some work related tasks. I genuinely hate Finder and was going to lean back and enjoy reading this article. This went into a direction I didn't expect at all.
6.
▲
by
xnickb
10d ago
Bonus points: kids need lego? Buy it without VAT. Write it off as a "client demo asset"
7.
▲
by
xnickb
17d ago
A bit weird to observe how the facade cracks when they're talking about it. Maybe I'm wrong but the whole thing felt very weird to me. Can't put my finger on it.. I want to say immature, but it's probably just unempathet
8.
▲
by
xnickb
23d ago
I understand what you're saying, but corporation is made of people. How is this communicated to my hiring manager and why do they agree to play this stupid game?
9.
▲
by
xnickb
28d ago
Any non X source for this so people who don't use X can have a look?
10.
▲
by
xnickb
28d ago
It's not invasive generally speaking. My healthcare provider allows me to access e-perscriptions via the app. But for that there are certain security requirements which this particular Healthcare provider equated to "Android good,
11.
▲
by
xnickb
28d ago
I highly doubt companies who did that reasoned out of supporting GOS, so I'd be surprised of they reason back in.
12.
▲
by
xnickb
28d ago
Some (European) banks/healthcare apps block GOS and require stock android. Just saying
13.
▲
by
xnickb
1mo ago
Ask me in 10 years. If I call it now it will make the prophecy fullfil itself even earlier.
14.
▲
by
xnickb
1mo ago
194. That one country will not be invited.
15.
▲
by
xnickb
1mo ago
I don't and never have used twitter/X so perhaps my view is skewed. But unless this is software running on my machine it being open sourced doesn't really give any insight into what is running on the server. To be clear: they
16.
▲
by
xnickb
1mo ago
> each cell is one sqlite database I just can't wrap my head around this. I know there is probably some very strongly motivated engineering reason like "we want objects to be isolated", but I just can't agree with thi
17.
▲
by
xnickb
1mo ago
I think they just know what they can and can't guarantee.
18.
▲
by
xnickb
1mo ago
Why would apple care? Eu is what a quarter of their business? And where exactly will those people move? They're locked into the Apple infra.
19.
▲
by
xnickb
1mo ago
And when you are done, what will happen with all that code you wrote?
20.
▲
by
xnickb
2mo ago
Fingerprint is an authentication mechanism, not an authorization one.
21.
▲
by
xnickb
2mo ago
So you are saying we need to conduct trials on a representative set of bayesnets of say.. 200k and then it'll be conclusive?
22.
▲
by
xnickb
2mo ago
does it ease the strain on the eyes? I believe that's individual and hard to measure. If it helps OP then I see no issue with it being useless for sleep. I tried using f.lux a decade ago or so. Deemed it not helpful for myself
23.
▲
by
xnickb
2mo ago
I didn't expect to read "Datacenters in space" on HN.
24.
▲
by
xnickb
2mo ago
Can you estimate how much it'd cost to make? Having ^F'ed "Load-bearing" I determined it must have been Claude
25.
▲
by
xnickb
2mo ago
No you just chose to ignore other cases that OP mentioned and focused on this one
26.
▲
by
xnickb
2mo ago
That's not my point. Rather that any self-hosted solution would. Encryption is completely optional and can be illegal in some places. As long as you trust the endpoint you only care about encryption in transit. If your devices are seiz
27.
▲
by
xnickb
2mo ago
Encryption in this case is irrelevant. If they get the encrypted backup they can already charge you if you don't decrypt it. Self-hosting is the way obviously
28.
▲
by
xnickb
2mo ago
What's the difference between this and wiping when under duress using the special PIN? If you aren't being checked you don't wipe and are gopd to go.
29.
▲
by
xnickb
2mo ago
What am I misinterpreting? OP literally said they don't understand why a journalist would carry these data with them. As if the data is a file on your phone. Data can be a contact book on your phone, or a messenger with E2E encrypted m
30.
▲
by
xnickb
2mo ago
So delete messengers, email apps and other comms? Delete the contact book? Clear calendars? Where exactly should one stop?
More ›