xilun666

20 ms·

1.
by xilun666 16y ago
You should exclude days of the year if possible, hitler seems to be directly related to most :/
2.
by xilun666 16y ago
Indeed, with enough magical legal verbiage and enough slightly unrelated drawing, you could. It probably would not be a valid patent, or maybe only valid on some not too interesting point, but validity does not really matters for patent hol
3.
by xilun666 16y ago
Given the price of the engineer sitting on that seat, that remains reasonable.
4.
by xilun666 16y ago
You seems to think most computers are complicated, with huge amount of memory needing dedicated and scalable components. This is not the case. Most computers are tiny; the kind of "you've only got 1kB built-in and non-expandable memory" tin
5.
by xilun666 16y ago
The authors basically says that it does not always like when people changes his stuff, so he thinks it's fine to do a kind of read only open source with additional unwritten rights (basically i've got the impression that it's okay to send
6.
by xilun666 16y ago
They are a bunch of morons. Give us their names, so we never deal with them ;)
7.
by xilun666 16y ago
Doing so, you expose yourself in propagating penetration from a compromised server to a previously secure one.
8.
by xilun666 16y ago
yeah, war is a mess, context exists on a battlefield, let's destroy more medevacs, YEAH fire in the hole.
9.
by xilun666 16y ago
Branching At the beginning you're are not even conscious that you can, but once you've discovered the power it gives you, you will branch twice a day just because you can (and more if you need). The two stage commit approach of git is inter
10.
by xilun666 17y ago
While the author says stuffs like "not to be used by bad persons", he also writes long shits about evading pursuit in the woods, killing dogs as needed, or getting out of cars while an helicopter is watching. Definitely weird, paranoid, but
11.
by xilun666 17y ago
The contrast that you describe between the state of spirit of sysadmins vs. programmers seems to mean that programmers do not need to consider impact on the rest of the architecture and the long-term maintenance cost of any given code chang
12.
by xilun666 17y ago
Either this is bad journalism or the "architect" is really high. Because proposed re-architecture makes absolutely no sense. The article starts with an obvious observation, being that scheduling (in its largest meaning) often is crap in rea